Welcome guest. Before posting on our computer help forum, you must register. Click here it's easy and free.
An undefined problem has an infinite number of solutions.—Robert A. Humphrey
You could at least accomodate him.
I for one don't like Avast.I found it to be slow at scanning, it slowed down the PC, and was ineffective at cleaning, containing and removing viruses.You've got your argument now.
Unfortunately, I dont really get viruses
I hated it's UI, but everyone's different.QuoteUnfortunately, I dont really get virusesUnfortunately?If you're feeling left out, I can send you some?LOL.I was using version 4.something, it was around a year ago so I'm not too sure.It was ineffective, I knew I had a virus and it did nothing at all to stop it, just let it go on its merry way.The "Virus Vault" failed to hold some infected files too.However, I'm not for AVG either, I use Avira Antivir.
AVG vs. AvastThere are two major things that keep myself from getting AVG:System RestoreBoot-time scanAVG [free] does not have boot-time scanning, ...
The thing I found that was really annoying with AVG was, I had it on my mom's computer and it's a slow computer and every time you booted it up it would update. So it would take you years to finally get things done.
Thats why I use Avast! Can't go wrong with In real-time scanning.
AVG, as I recall, only scans the files about to be booted during its bootup scan. Boot-Time scan, however, is like running your OnDemmand scanner, but quicker, and with more resources available, and no files in use.
Quote from: Zylstra on May 06, 2007, 04:15:38 PMAVG, as I recall, only scans the files about to be booted during its bootup scan. Boot-Time scan, however, is like running your OnDemmand scanner, but quicker, and with more resources available, and no files in use. Ah.Ok.Thanks
Quote from: WillyW on May 06, 2007, 04:19:18 PMQuote from: Zylstra on May 06, 2007, 04:15:38 PMAVG, as I recall, only scans the files about to be booted during its bootup scan. Boot-Time scan, however, is like running your OnDemmand scanner, but quicker, and with more resources available, and no files in use. Ah.Ok.ThanksThis is inaccurate...p.s. Zylstra do me a favor...make a folder and nest it 5 levels deep and place eicar in there and see if Avast finds it even on it's thourough scan....a root beer says it won't.
Quote from: patio on May 06, 2007, 09:49:25 PMQuote from: WillyW on May 06, 2007, 04:19:18 PMQuote from: Zylstra on May 06, 2007, 04:15:38 PMAVG, as I recall, only scans the files about to be booted during its bootup scan. Boot-Time scan, however, is like running your OnDemmand scanner, but quicker, and with more resources available, and no files in use. Ah.Ok.ThanksThis is inaccurate...p.s. Zylstra do me a favor...make a folder and nest it 5 levels deep and place eicar in there and see if Avast finds it even on it's thourough scan....a root beer says it won't.I'd like to know why that would make a difference. Any scanner that can't do this would have to be very poorly designed. I wouldn't say that Avast! is the greatest, but it's certainly not that bad.One thing I would like to point out, though, is that AVG detects Eicar the very second it's created. As soon as I save the file, AVG notifies me.
Try packing it 5 levels deep in an archive then, rather than folders.
As soon as I click on the link to download it Avast warns me.
Quote from: Calum on May 07, 2007, 02:20:13 AMTry packing it 5 levels deep in an archive then, rather than folders.No matter what I try to archive it with, access is denied.
...It also depends on the scan type. (A lot of virus scanners allow a user to not scan .zip and other packers, since it takes longer)I cant even start downloading the virus file, since Avast stops it before I even click "Save As"
Quote from: Zylstra on May 07, 2007, 02:09:55 PM ...It also depends on the scan type. (A lot of virus scanners allow a user to not scan .zip and other packers, since it takes longer)I cant even start downloading the virus file, since Avast stops it before I even click "Save As"From where? The eicar.zip file attached above? or from.... ?
Wherever it is from, that is very interesting. I wonder how AV software running on your computer can know what is in a file residing on another computer, before a transfer even begins.
Its here:http://www.eicar.org/anti_virus_test_file.htm
Just scroll down the page a while,
or use the version that was attached to the Forums.
***WP: In this case, the and the comma were added to add sarchasitc enthusiasmQuoteWherever it is from, that is very interesting. I wonder how AV software running on your computer can know what is in a file residing on another computer, before a transfer even begins.How it knows what it is before its really "downloaded"?Because part of it goes into the Temporary internet folder, thats why
Willy, are you using some Wanna-be browser, like "Browse Happy" that provides you with crappy unhappy time?
Unfortunately, eicar.org appears to be down at the moment. So download the same attachment you uploaded...
*sigh****WP:
Implies that I am giving up,
and discluding the sarcasm. But to even things out, and prevent enemies:
Browse Happy is this Wanna-Be web browser I ran into once. (Ugh!) its advert. came with BrowseHappy Oh, I guess its not a browserIts a website telling people to switch to something besides MS Internet Explorer...http://browsehappy.com/
Just goes to show...***WP: Ha! "Look at me and my mistakes"
For the rest of the week, whenever Zylstra uses "Word Psychology" he includes a ***WP note to explain what he's doing, which is why his posts look so confusing. If you simply ignore them, his posts will make a bit more sense.
right, you just like using big words to confuse other members (mainly me)