|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dias de verano
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: September 13, 2008, 03:29:41 AM » |
|
To steal a phrase from Obama, the Chrome bells and whistles are the crudely hastily and badly applied lipstick, and the (very ugly) pig is the outdated version of Safari that Google's browser is based on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mcxeb52!
Guest
|
|
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2008, 11:57:15 PM » |
|
if only google chrome and apple's safari switched faces (at least on windows), then maybe it would work  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
drmsucks
Posts: 1,934
|
|
« Reply #11 on: September 18, 2008, 03:57:53 PM » |
|
Does Google have any non Beta products |
If you don't have time to do it right
...when will you have time to do it over?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
evilfantasy
Malware Removal Specialist
Thanked: 462
Posts: 11,769
Experience: Beginner
OS: Windows 7
Calm like a bomb
 
|
|
« Reply #14 on: September 19, 2008, 03:38:18 PM » |
|
The more I read the more all of this becomes more clear. Google isn't just trying to give us a new browser, they are actually trying to create a new "Web OS." They are actually going after MS. It also explains all of the cacheing the browser does. Although I don't like the cacheing, your information is only going to be at risk "if" someone hacks into the Google servers, just like it would be if they hacked into your bank, paypal or even your own computer. Hopefully and very likely everything is encrypted so there would still be a huge degree of difficulty in anyone actually stealing your information. "Google knows that the way to beat Microsoft is to become the operating system for the Internet. You do that by [rendering] the actual OS obsolete."
Google's Chrome aims to kill Windows, make Web the OS of choice I've also read some of the security blogs and they don't have any concern about the cacheing. Google is also taking big steps to make sure everyones information stays safe. Google hires browser hacking guru
Zalewski, who has been credited in the past with finding several major vulnerabilities (buffer overflow in SendMail, weaknesses in TCP/IP ISNs, code execution hole in IE’s JPG rendering) has spent most of 2007 releasing details of severe holes in Internet Explorer and Firefox — constantly cracking the browsers’ security models. |
|
|
|
|
|
patio
Moderator
Thanked: 1069
Posts: 11,354
Experience: Beginner
OS: Windows 7
Maud' Dib
|
|
« Reply #16 on: September 19, 2008, 05:24:28 PM » |
|
Google is also taking big steps to make sure everyones information stays safe. It appears Yahoo didn't do such a good job with Sarah Palin's e-mail info... Whose to say google can do it better ? ? Anything under the Sun can and will be hacked...eventually. |
 " All generalizations are false, including this one. " |
|
|
|
|
patio
Moderator
Thanked: 1069
Posts: 11,354
Experience: Beginner
OS: Windows 7
Maud' Dib
|
|
« Reply #18 on: September 19, 2008, 06:01:36 PM » |
|
http://www.computerhope.com/forum/index.php/topic,66695.0.html I had never considered this angle and i must say unfortunately it's a distinct possibility... e-mail papparrazzi anyone ? ? |
" All generalizations are false, including this one. "
|
|
|
Broni
Thanked: 610
Posts: 28,751
Computer: Specs
Experience: Experienced
OS: Windows Vista
Kraków my love :)
|
|
« Reply #19 on: September 19, 2008, 06:25:51 PM » |
|
How can I trust Google with my private info, since:
1. Chrome definitely started from the wrong foot, considering its privacy/security issues (yes, I know it's beta)
2. It tries to drive-by-install its *censored* bar in every other application, I try to install. We all know, that when you have IE, or FF problem, Google toolbar is very first suspect (along with Yahoo toolbar).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home
Help
Chat
Connect
Posts
Login
Register
Author