.

.

[Global Moderator]

It should be okay.

Try looking here: http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/referrer/srtest

Should handle it on medium, maybe some high settings, depending on your resolution.
I can run on all high, barring one setting on medium to reduce stutter.
Wait ... I just saw you have a DDR2 9600GT.  I've never heard of one before, just Googled and it does actually exist ... interesting.  Not sure how your performance will be with that, I can't find any benchmarks for it, but I'd say medium settings.
One more thing - how many gaming computers do you have?  I'm sure this isn't the first time you've asked about a gaming type computer which isn't in your system specs.

/

.

I WOULD HAVE TO SAY NO !!!!

CPU TO SLOW

Recommended System Requirements
OS - Windows XP / Vista
Processor - Intel Core 2 DUO @ 2.2GHz or AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
Memory - 2.0 GB RAM
GPU - NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS/640 or similar

Minimum System Requirements
OS - Windows XP or Windows Vista
Processor - 2.8 GHz or faster (XP) or 3.2 GHz or faster* (Vista)
Memory - 1.0 GB RAM (XP) or 1.5 GB RAM (Vista)
Video Card -256 MB**
Hard Drive - 12GB
Sound Card - DirectX 9.0c compatible

* Supported Processors: Intel Pentium 4 2.8 GHz (3.2 GHz for Vista) or faster, Intel Core 2.0 GHz (2.2 GHz for Vista) or faster, AMD Athlon 2800+ (3200+ for Vista) or faster

.

I WOULD HAVE TO SAY NO !!!!

CPU TO SLOW

Recommended System Requirements
OS - Windows XP / Vista
Processor - Intel Core 2 DUO @ 2.2GHz or AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+
Memory - 2.0 GB RAM
GPU - NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS/640 or similar

Minimum System Requirements
OS - Windows XP or Windows Vista
Processor - 2.8 GHz or faster (XP) or 3.2 GHz or faster* (Vista)
Memory - 1.0 GB RAM (XP) or 1.5 GB RAM (Vista)
Video Card -256 MB**
Hard Drive - 12GB
Sound Card - DirectX 9.0c compatible

* Supported Processors: Intel Pentium 4 2.8 GHz (3.2 GHz for Vista) or faster, Intel Core 2.0 GHz (2.2 GHz for Vista) or faster, AMD Athlon 2800+ (3200+ for Vista) or faster

Well i would have to stop you right there.

1.8hz of lacked cpu power, is not going to prevent my system from running the game, nor is it too slow.

I have personally seen a computer with the same specs as me, only diff, is a slower gpu, much slower, only 7600gt at 256mb
That pc, ran crysis with minimal lag, and actually produced some nice effects.

I think what you have done is just pulled some facts from google, and slumped them here without thought.
Anyone would know that 1.8hz of lacked cpu, is not going to make it too slow too run.

also- your processor is dual core and (I believe) 64-bit... in that sense it almost meets the recommended requirements.

The CPU will hold it back a little but not too badly, as it's just below the recommended specs.

So inconclusion, do you think it should run crysis maybe a few on high settings?

Did you read my post?

Should it ran faster and more fluidly with the 1gb GPU?

As I say, I'm not sure.  More memory isn't always better - in this case it's worse, because it's slower.  Not sure how it will affect performance as I can't find any benchmarks.

.

[Global Moderator]

Curious....was my post ever acknowledged?

Curious....was my post ever acknowledged?

Well....I read it 

It is true that the Dual Core at only 1.8Ghz may bottleneck, but also with a good GPU and enough ram it should run good enough anyway because the Graphics card has 1GB of RAM for textures and so forth, so they can be held on the card itself, andthen it  doesn't even need to dip into the RAM texture space reserves, and so bottlenecks will be minimal, only with large explosions that require physics, which will add extra strain to the CPU.

.

58-60, you mean frames per second? that's pretty decent frame rates, in my opinion. in the 100's would be excellent but as long as you don't lag or anything at the settings you are comfortable with, that's all that really matters.