Home / Other / Other / October monthly poll
0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  All - (Bottom) Print
Poll
Question: Do you plan on upgrading to Windows 7?
Yes - immediately   -37 (13.5%)
Yes - but waiting   -95 (34.5%)
No never   -20 (7.3%)
Not sure yet   -83 (30.2%)
Already installed   -40 (14.5%)
Total Members Voted: 263

Author Topic: October monthly poll  (Read 14965 times)
patio
Moderator
Genius



Thanked: 1023
Posts: 10,558

Experience: Beginner
OS: Windows 7


Maud' Dib

« Reply #30 on: October 07, 2009, 08:24:30 AM »

With the huge BETA release to the general public i believe you won't seequite as many issues with 7 as we did with Vista...
IP logged

   
"
All generalizations are false, including this one.  "
Allan
Moderator
Genius



Thanked: 820
Posts: 13,793

Experience: Guru
OS: Windows 7



Forum Administrator
« Reply #31 on: October 07, 2009, 11:02:04 AM »

Well, just received my Windows 7 (Final) DVD's from MS (1 copy of Professional and 1 copy of Ultimate). I'll get around to playing with them one of these days :)
IP logged
Geek-9pm
Sage



Thanked: 327
Posts: 8,047

Computer: Specs
Experience: Familiar
OS: Windows XP


Geek After Dark

« Reply #32 on: October 07, 2009, 11:12:07 AM »

My version of Windos 7 RC calles itseld 'Ultimate"...
 but it seems to be lacking something.
I have it installed on two machines. This machine is my Dell 280 SFF.
Can't log onto Internet on this machine...The wireless card is not very compatible. So I bought a new card that is Windows 7 certified. Should be here in a few days.
IP logged
npersn31
Rookie



Posts: 27

Experience: Beginner
OS: Windows Vista



« Reply #33 on: October 07, 2009, 07:44:15 PM »

I think there should be a place for just "no"; "no never" is too strong a choice for my answer and "yes, but waiting" doesn't quite fit.
npersn31 ;)
IP logged
Cityscape
Adviser



Thanked: 14
Posts: 722

Certifications: List
Experience: Familiar
OS: Linux variant


Running Ubuntu 10.10

My Blog
« Reply #34 on: October 07, 2009, 11:17:07 PM »

I think there should be a place for just "no"; "no never" is too strong a choice for my answer and "yes, but waiting" doesn't quite fit.
npersn31 ;)
I agree
IP logged

Moderator of UbuntuBrainstorm, http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/.

Griff
Intermediate



Thanked: 11
Posts: 215




« Reply #35 on: October 08, 2009, 12:07:24 AM »

wouldn't "Not sure yet" work?
IP logged

Don't forget to give thanks if I was able to help ya! Please?
patio
Moderator
Genius



Thanked: 1023
Posts: 10,558

Experience: Beginner
OS: Windows 7


Maud' Dib

« Reply #36 on: October 08, 2009, 07:14:32 AM »

"No"...
IP logged

   
"
All generalizations are false, including this one.  "
Richter101
Greenhorn



Posts: 9


« Reply #37 on: October 08, 2009, 07:57:37 AM »

I plan to wait and find out how it does for a couple of months and see if there is any real reason for me to make the switch. From what I have seen Vista and Windows 7 seem around the same.
IP logged
Chris7251m
Greenhorn



Posts: 7


« Reply #38 on: October 09, 2009, 06:31:29 PM »

I have a free upgrade, but am leery to do this right away, any advice out there?
IP logged
Cityscape
Adviser



Thanked: 14
Posts: 722

Certifications: List
Experience: Familiar
OS: Linux variant


Running Ubuntu 10.10

My Blog
« Reply #39 on: October 09, 2009, 10:11:00 PM »

I have a free upgrade, but am leery to do this right away, any advice out there?
If it was me I would upgrade a soon as I could. It is a really good OS, the beta was actually more stable then Vista when it was first released. It has a lot of new features too. I'd say go for it. :)
IP logged

Moderator of UbuntuBrainstorm, http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/.

gindelacruz
Newbie



Posts: 1


« Reply #40 on: October 10, 2009, 03:06:13 AM »

answered yes I will but not not strait away as i remember all the bugs and driver problems in vista when it first came out(cannot connect to printer being one)and they knew microsoft was making a new op. And as my comp came from P/B with just enough to run vista basic I know it will run 7 easy especially after all the upgrades I did

No bugs so far in Windows 7. Been running the beta for 6 months and recently got a free copy of Microsoft 7 for hosting a Microsoft Intro Party. Much better than Vista!
IP logged
BG-Fan
Starter



Posts: 3


« Reply #41 on: October 12, 2009, 10:10:40 AM »

I voted "Not sure yet". I'm not an early adopter so I'll wait. The first version of anything always has a few bugs in it and I'm pretty happy with XP right now. As an aside, how did they (Microsoft) decide this would be Windows 7 and not something like Windows 12  ???
IP logged
Cityscape
Adviser



Thanked: 14
Posts: 722

Certifications: List
Experience: Familiar
OS: Linux variant


Running Ubuntu 10.10

My Blog
« Reply #42 on: October 12, 2009, 11:57:04 AM »

As an aside, how did they (Microsoft) decide this would be Windows 7 and not something like Windows 12  ???
It is their 7th major OS. This is what i was told:

Windows 95 was the 1st
Windows 98 was the 2nd
Windows 2000 was the 3rd
Windows ME was the 4th
Windows XP was the 5th
Vista was the 6th
And Win7 is the 7th of course.
IP logged

Moderator of UbuntuBrainstorm, http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/.

BC_Programmer
Mastermind


Thanked: 682
Posts: 15,624

Computer: Specs
Experience: Beginner
OS: Windows 7


Pinkie Pie is best pony

BC-Programming.com 1 1
« Reply #43 on: October 12, 2009, 01:51:33 PM »

version numbers for those Windows OS's whose versions are not in the name:

Windows 95: 4.00.1111

Windows 98: 4.10.1998
Windows 98 SE: 4.10.2222
Windows ME: 4.90.3000
Windows 2000: 5.0.2195 (the "build number" is different for the different SPs... this one is SP4)
Windows XP: 5.1.xxxx (same as above... also merges business (NT) with consumer(9x) lineage)
Windows Vista: 6.0.6002 (Revision different for the SPs, same as above)
Windows 7: 6.1.xxxx (again... SPs...)

Windows 7 is Version 6.1, but that isn't as catchy as just 7.

There is no technical reason it's called Windows 7. It's purely marketing. Same reason they moved away from calling the OS by their version numbers to begin with- marketing. (Which would sound better in 95, "WINDOWS VERSION 4.00.1111" or "Windows 95"?)

It's purely a marketing thing.
IP logged

macdad-
Expert



Thanked: 39
Posts: 2,520


LoneWolf's Circuits
« Reply #44 on: October 12, 2009, 02:22:54 PM »

version numbers for those Windows OS's whose versions are not in the name:

Windows 95: 4.00.1111

Windows 98: 4.10.1998
Windows 98 SE: 4.10.2222
Windows ME: 4.90.3000
Windows 2000: 5.0.2195 (the "build number" is different for the different SPs... this one is SP4)
Windows XP: 5.1.xxxx (same as above... also merges business (NT) with consumer(9x) lineage)
Windows Vista: 6.0.6002 (Revision different for the SPs, same as above)
Windows 7: 6.1.xxxx (again... SPs...)

Windows 7 is Version 6.1, but that isn't as catchy as just 7.

There is no technical reason it's called Windows 7. It's purely marketing. Same reason they moved away from calling the OS by their version numbers to begin with- marketing. (Which would sound better in 95, "WINDOWS VERSION 4.00.1111" or "Windows 95"?)

It's purely a marketing thing.

Sounds more and more like stardates  :D
IP logged

If you dont know DOS, you dont know Windows...

Thats why Bill Gates created the Windows NT Family.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  All - (Top) Print 
Home / Other / Other / October monthly poll « previous next »
 


Login with username, password and session length

Old Forum Search | Forum Rules
Copyright © 2010 Computer Hope ® All rights reserved.
Powered by SMF 2.0 RC3 | SMF © 2006–2010, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 0.101 seconds with 23 queries.