Welcome guest. Before posting on our computer help forum, you must register. Click here it's easy and free.

Author Topic: Q8400 Bottleneck GTX 660  (Read 4944 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

JoeKkerr

    Topic Starter


    Beginner

    • Experience: Beginner
    • OS: Windows 7
    Q8400 Bottleneck GTX 660
    « on: August 04, 2013, 05:25:34 AM »


    Hello guys ,

    My system specs :-

    Core 2 Quad Q8400 @2.66GHZ
    Trancend 2 GB RAM
    Gigabyte G41 Mobo
    Asus Direct Cu II GTX 660 OC Edition
    500GB Seagate HDD
    LG Cinema D2342 23" 3D Monitor

    I recently upgraded from 9400gt to gtx 660...so the jump is TOO *censored* HIGH

    I saw all the videos & even posted on this forum to get suggestion for 660

    First game :- The witcher 2

    I should be able to max out The witcher 2 with ubersampling off...but i am getting pretty laggy & low frame rates...so i turned down the shadows & still the same & even played with v sync On & off

    GTA 4

    Ok this game is a bad port & buggy as *censored* in terms of graphics & i've heard that it uses more CPU power than the GPU ...I get max 13 FPS & minimum 8 FPS

    So a gtx 660 should be able to max out above games..i know the titles mentioned are graphic intensive games...i dont wish ultra settings on 660 but still at least playable framerates...

    I wud have posted videos but with fraps these games become literally unplayable

    Is this because of my Q8400...i searched the web & 60% of so called research says YES.. what do you guys think
    Some people like my advice so much that they frame it on wall instead of using it !

    BC_Programmer


      Mastermind
    • Typing is no substitute for thinking.
    • Thanked: 1140
      • Yes
      • Yes
      • BC-Programming.com
    • Certifications: List
    • Computer: Specs
    • Experience: Beginner
    • OS: Windows 11
    Re: Q8400 Bottleneck GTX 660
    « Reply #1 on: August 04, 2013, 05:21:48 PM »
    Is this because of my Q8400...i searched the web & 60% of so called research says YES.. what do you guys think

    I have a [email protected] and a 9800GT and I get 60fps in GTAIV.
    I was trying to dereference Null Pointers before it was cool.

    Calum

    • Moderator


    • Egghead

      Thanked: 238
      • Yes
      • Yes
    • Certifications: List
    • Computer: Specs
    • Experience: Beginner
    • OS: Other
    Re: Q8400 Bottleneck GTX 660
    « Reply #2 on: August 05, 2013, 02:30:55 AM »
    If you turn down the resolution, what happens to your frame rates?

    JoeKkerr

      Topic Starter


      Beginner

      • Experience: Beginner
      • OS: Windows 7
      Re: Q8400 Bottleneck GTX 660
      « Reply #3 on: August 07, 2013, 03:25:48 AM »
      I turned down the reso to 1600X900 but still getting only 15-20 fps & some of the details to low
      Some people like my advice so much that they frame it on wall instead of using it !

      Calum

      • Moderator


      • Egghead

        Thanked: 238
        • Yes
        • Yes
      • Certifications: List
      • Computer: Specs
      • Experience: Beginner
      • OS: Other
      Re: Q8400 Bottleneck GTX 660
      « Reply #4 on: August 07, 2013, 05:05:46 AM »
      Turn the resolution way down, say to 1024x768, and see if it improves, that's the easiest way to check if you're CPU or GPU limited.

      JoeKkerr

        Topic Starter


        Beginner

        • Experience: Beginner
        • OS: Windows 7
        Re: Q8400 Bottleneck GTX 660
        « Reply #5 on: August 07, 2013, 10:15:47 AM »
        Done but hardly 2-5 fps increase
        Some people like my advice so much that they frame it on wall instead of using it !

        DaveLembke



          Sage
        • Thanked: 662
        • Certifications: List
        • Computer: Specs
        • Experience: Expert
        • OS: Windows 10
        Re: Q8400 Bottleneck GTX 660
        « Reply #6 on: August 07, 2013, 02:38:20 PM »
        I have played Witcher 2 on an Athlon II x4 620 2.6 Ghz with 3GB DDR2 800Mhz Corsair XMS2 ( 4GB limited to 3GB due to Windows 7 32-bit ) with 500GB SATA II drive and  ASUS ATI Radeon HD5450 video card with 512MB on 19" samsung flat screen with 1024x768 and I get between 20 and 30fps and details set to normal.

        *The frame rate for me changed depending on how much rendering was going on, such as if a lot of action is happening it slowed to around 20fps but if not much was happening it was like 30fps. * Its been a while since I have invested any money into a powerful video card mainly because I was getting upset with GPU cooling fan failures with the GeForce cards like the GeForce 8800GT from BFG. The fan stopped and the GPU melted down  :'( and that card cost a pretty penny when I bought it new. I have since just bought $40 or cheaper video cards and currently use passive heatsink cards which I mount a 80mm fan towards them to keep them cool, and the games I run run fine on them including GTA IV and Driver - San Francisco. Driver - San Francisco actually causes my CPU fan to increase in speed to max when playing it and running from cops, so its CPU intensive. Witcher 2 and GTA IV dont cause the CPU fan to max out on speed.

        The only thing I see is that your running on 2GB RAM, and I'd add more if the motherboard supports it, especially if your running a newer OS than Windows XP.

        I have also seen degraded performance with single-channel memory config such as a single 2GB stick running worse than 2 x 1GB sticks in Dual-channel config.

        Is your 2 GB RAM a single stick or a pair of 1GB sticks or a mix of 1GB stick + 2 x 512MB sticks as 3 sticks in 3 of 4 memory slots?