Computer Hope

Other => Other => Off topic => Topic started by: reaper_tbs on May 16, 2007, 03:50:55 AM

Title: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: reaper_tbs on May 16, 2007, 03:50:55 AM: I believe that it's a bodypart and therefore should be considered appropriate in all aspects of life, eg. "i'm going to touch you with my hand" or ï have genitals on my head".

if used appropriately that is.
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: Carbon Dudeoxide on May 16, 2007, 04:02:48 AM: Ummm.......
This is a computer related forum.....and we don't really....well.....i...umm....
A lot of adults use this forum and they might find it...inappropriate.......
I think i'll hold my vote ;)
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: reaper_tbs on May 16, 2007, 04:07:42 AM: Quote from: Carbon Dudeoxide on May 16, 2007, 04:02:48 AM
Ummm.......
This is a computer related forum.....and we don't really....well.....i...umm....
A lot of adults use this forum and they might find it...inappropriate.......
I think i'll hold my vote ;)

ah but it isn't, inappropriate or a computer forum that is ;)

it's off topic :P
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: Calum on May 16, 2007, 09:11:10 AM: It would just lead to yet more immaturity.
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: reaper_tbs on May 16, 2007, 02:16:45 PM: Quote from: Calum on May 16, 2007, 09:11:10 AM
It would just lead to yet more immaturity.

that would suggest previous immaturity, no?
display please?
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: M1CH431 on May 16, 2007, 02:19:26 PM: Quote from: Carbon Dudeoxide on May 16, 2007, 04:02:48 AM
Ummm.......
This is a computer related forum.....and we don't really....well.....i...umm....
A lot of adults use this forum and they might find it...inappropriate.......
I think i'll hold my vote ;)
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: reaper_tbs on May 16, 2007, 02:26:53 PM: lol
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: 2k_dummy on May 16, 2007, 02:37:07 PM: Quote from: reaper_tbs on May 16, 2007, 02:16:45 PM
Quote from: Calum on May 16, 2007, 09:11:10 AM
It would just lead to yet more immaturity.

that would suggest previous immaturity, no?
display please?

You can't display what has been deleted. There are to many children and people who are immature or overly sensitive to permit it. Some take offense at even vague references that are made in a joking manner. It is best to give up on the idea as no amount of arguing will convince otherwise.
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: street1 (RIP) on May 16, 2007, 03:44:36 PM: I actually voted:----->NO! Feces head. ???
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: PeckerWood on May 16, 2007, 03:50:12 PM: I did not vote because it would be unfair.

What's the problem?Did you need to talk
about your a$$ ,or something. ;D

Bubba Please!LOL
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: Computer Hope Admin on May 18, 2007, 06:02:57 PM: I cannot come up with (in my mind) any way someone need to use this type of terminology on the forums apart from maybe a post in the off topic section.
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: Raptor on May 18, 2007, 07:01:44 PM: What the h**l is this about? I like female body parts, by the way. But they don't necessary have to be together! har har! I'm coming for you Zylstra!

Quote
peculiaroso

You shouldn't be allowed to say that because it's not a word..
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: Dark Blade on May 21, 2007, 03:21:59 AM: peculiaroso
peculiaroso
peculiaroso
peculiaroso
peculiaroso
peculiaroso
peculiaroso
peculiaroso

I can say that all I want, because I am ignorant of what it means! ;D

Peculiaroso is a 1994 album by guitarist Leo Kottke.

Coming more than two years after the Great Big Boy album, where all tracks included vocal parts, Peculiaroso returned to Kottke's usual mix of vocal and instrumental selections. The album included several notable cover versions, including an instrumental take on the Sutherland Brothers' "Arms of Mary" and a version of Randall Hylton's "Room at the Top of the Stairs" which received some airplay on Adult Alternative radio.

The album was produced by singer-songwriter Rickie Lee Jones, who also provided backing vocals on several tracks. Kottke credited Jones with capturing a more spontaneous and relaxed feel on the recording than was typical of his own attempts.

(wiki - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peculiaroso)

Ok, did ANYONE know that before you read this?
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: GX1_Man on May 21, 2007, 04:04:47 AM: I did because I edited the poll. ;)

Good research though, and absolutely correct.
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: Dark Blade on May 21, 2007, 04:31:55 AM: Wikipedia is one of my two homepages! (the other is Google)

But really, is peculiaroso at anatomical terminology?
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: Raptor on May 21, 2007, 06:59:48 AM: Quote
Ok, did ANYONE know that before you read this?

Yes, because I googled it myself and figured someone was playing a trick on us.
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: GX1_Man on May 22, 2007, 05:14:07 PM: Quote from: Dark Blade on May 21, 2007, 04:31:55 AM
Wikipedia is one of my two homepages! (the other is Google)

But really, is peculiaroso at anatomical terminology?

I think that's as close as it needs to go.
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: Dilbert on May 22, 2007, 05:58:01 PM: I say that, if used properly, terminology related to the genital area shouldn't be disallowed. I'm not saying that they should be used willy-nilly, but if, for some reason, one has to make a reference to the *censored*, they should be allowed to.

So long as we can be more mature than "OMG h3 s41d "p3n1s!!!111oneoneone", anyway. ;)
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: patio on May 22, 2007, 06:38:43 PM: Quote from: Dilbert on May 22, 2007, 05:58:01 PM
I say that, if used properly, terminology related to the genital area shouldn't be disallowed. I'm not saying that they should be used willy-nilly, but if, for some reason, one has to make a reference to the p***s, they should be allowed to.

So long as we can be more mature than "OMG h3 s41d "p3n1s!!!111oneoneone", anyway. ;)

Congratulations ! !

You have just been promoted to our Official textspeak/hakrz translator....
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: CBMatt on May 23, 2007, 08:21:18 AM: I, for one, would like to know why an individual would "have to make reference to the *censored*" on a computer help forum. If we start getting topics like "Help, I got my *censored* caught in the A drive!" then I think we have issues bigger than censorship here.

Not that I'd be upset. I mean, I'm sure we've all been caught in inanimate objects before.
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: Jp on May 23, 2007, 09:58:23 PM: Are you guys talking about the Off-Topic Post or Some other part of CH ?

8) Hey Its Happy Hour ! ! ! ;D

(http://i166.photobucket.com/albums/u97/JoJoPoole/HappyHour.jpg)(http://)
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: Jp on May 24, 2007, 03:04:57 AM: But Yeah , . . . I will say this, . . . Our own Government Couldn't Find it's Own a*s
If It Had It's Hand In It's Back Pocket !

And by that I mean, How could you keep Kids off this site or that site ?

I Think that would be Unquestionable ! Besides That, For That Matter How would ? ? ? You or Could , . .I Think, . . Like You Tell Me , Ummmm,. . "Blahbity Blab-Blab Blah ! !

By This I Mean , . .

No disrespect, . . but it would be nice if we could eliminate the concern for minors !

(http://And of Course I won't be sued fopr Deflamation if I say that Contrex is more Than likely A Pervert ! !)

:-* :-* :-*
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: Jp on May 24, 2007, 04:52:11 AM: Pages: 1 [2] All

Poll
Question: Should you be allowed to say such words as peculiaroso?
yes
no
View results

P.S. I do Somewhat Like, My CH Pen !

SKREW THE BANK of ROMA ! ! !

Benafactobutofoko !!

Qoute: Raptor, 052307 Bengladesha,..Binganstrada,

News Makers on CH Fantastic Network:
Make sure to cast your vote in this months poll.

Raptoir ; "I like yingling!"
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: dl65 on May 24, 2007, 11:27:11 AM: Enough of this nonsense people.......

This thread has degenerated into something that is not even close to being called off-topic.

I am going to lock it for your own protection.

dl65 ::)
Title: Re: should anatomical terminologies be allowed in forums?
Post by: Dilbert on May 24, 2007, 04:08:32 PM: Quote from: CBMatt on May 23, 2007, 08:21:18 AM
I, for one, would like to know why an individual would "have to make reference to the *censored*" on a computer help forum. If we start getting topics like "Help, I got my *censored* caught in the A drive!" then I think we have issues bigger than censorship here.

I know this topic is closed, but LOL. That's awesome. ;D