Computer Hope

Other => Other => Topic started by: Cityscape on August 14, 2009, 02:26:47 PM

Title: Computer OS advice wanted.
Post by: Cityscape on August 14, 2009, 02:26:47 PM
I'm thinking about buying a old PC with specs something like these:
a 300-600 Mhz CPU and 64 MB RAM

I need to:
- be able to use the internet (LAN via Ethernet)
- view documents (including .docx)
- use USB devices
- run as many applications as possible

I want to know which OS you guys think is best?

Windows 95 is not an option because of no or very little USB support and it can't run Firefox 2.
Windows 98 FE is also not an option because of little USB support

So the options I have left are Windows 98SE, Windows ME or maybe NT.
What is NT USB support like, is it as good as 98SE or ME support?
Which of the 3 has most modern programs supporting it?

So far I think ME is my best choice.
Title: Re: Computer OS advice wanted.
Post by: Aegis on August 14, 2009, 02:29:40 PM
How about a Linux distribution? 
Title: Re: Computer OS advice wanted.
Post by: Cityscape on August 14, 2009, 02:32:35 PM
I have considered it. I love Ubuntu.
Do you think Ubuntu would perform good on such an old PC?
I don't mind using an older Ubuntu/Xubuntu release like 7.04 either.
Title: Re: Computer OS advice wanted.
Post by: Karnac on August 14, 2009, 03:06:23 PM
I had a similar situation ......

http://www.computerhope.com/forum/index.php/topic,86679.msg580025.html#msg580025
Title: Re: Computer OS advice wanted.
Post by: patio on August 14, 2009, 04:32:19 PM
Win2K if you prefer Windows...
If not ...Ubuntu.
Title: Re: Computer OS advice wanted.
Post by: Helpmeh on August 14, 2009, 05:27:36 PM
Well. If you want Office Word, get it now. You'll need 2007 to view .docx and I don't know if it works on anything earlier than XP.
Title: Re: Computer OS advice wanted.
Post by: BC_Programmer on August 14, 2009, 07:28:33 PM
I had XP on my 350Mhz K6-2 for a fairly long time, no problems.... but the RAM kinda precludes that idea.

NT didn't really have USB at all until W2K...
Title: Re: Computer OS advice wanted.
Post by: Cityscape on August 14, 2009, 08:51:22 PM
You'll need 2007 to view .docx and I don't know if it works on anything earlier than XP.
Not correct. Office 2000 and 2003 can use .docx files.
See Here: http://www.microsoft.com/nz/digitallife/software/microsoft_office_compatibility_pack_for_2007_file_formats.mspx#
Title: Re: Computer OS advice wanted.
Post by: Cityscape on August 14, 2009, 09:06:01 PM
Win2K if you prefer Windows...
If not ...Ubuntu.
I had XP on my 350Mhz K6-2 for a fairly long time, no problems.... but the RAM kinda precludes that idea.

NT didn't really have USB at all until W2K...
Will XP or Ubuntu actually run well?

NT is not an option then as I must have USB support.

Which is better then for application compatibility: 98SE or Me?
Which has better USB support?

I don't think 2000 and XP will be options, they'd run too slow on this PC i think.
Title: Re: Computer OS advice wanted.
Post by: BC_Programmer on August 14, 2009, 09:40:04 PM
On that machine, you'd need more RAM before considering Ubuntu or XP.... aside fro mthe RAM it would probably do fine.

Personally I'd go for windows 98SE, and then install the unofficial Service pack- ME is essentially 98SE with a change to prevent restarting in DOS mode.
Title: Re: Computer OS advice wanted.
Post by: Carbon Dudeoxide on August 14, 2009, 09:44:07 PM
I recently rebuilt an old computer with similar specs. Runs fine with Windows 2000.

I chose Windows 2000 because of the low specification requirements and its advanced USB support.
Title: Re: Computer OS advice wanted.
Post by: BC_Programmer on August 14, 2009, 09:44:37 PM
but, did it only have 64MB of RAM?
Title: Re: Computer OS advice wanted.
Post by: Carbon Dudeoxide on August 14, 2009, 09:49:13 PM
It had 128mb but the second RAM stick failed on me.

But hey, Microsoft says Windows XP requires 64MB of RAM.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314865


Windows 2000:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/304297
Title: Re: Computer OS advice wanted.
Post by: Cityscape on August 14, 2009, 10:21:34 PM
It had 128mb but the second RAM stick failed on me.

But hey, Microsoft says Windows XP requires 64MB of RAM.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314865


Windows 2000:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/304297
XP will be way too slow. I like speedy computers.

I see now that 2000 works with only 32 MB RAM.

I think I've decided that Windows 2000 will be good for my needs.
It has great USB support and program compatibility.
Title: Re: Computer OS advice wanted.
Post by: Quantos on August 15, 2009, 05:06:35 PM
I'm thinking about buying a old PC with specs something like these:
a 300-600 Mhz CPU and 64 MB RAM

Why would you buy something with those specs, I hope that the price is REALLY low.

Quote
So far I think ME is my best choice.

I think that Win2K is your best choice.
Title: Re: Computer OS advice wanted.
Post by: Cityscape on August 15, 2009, 06:48:44 PM
I think that Win2K is your best choice.
Me too.
Why would you buy something with those specs, I hope that the price is REALLY low.
Well I want a computer for $30 Cdn. What kind of computer would I get for that price? I was thinking that for $30 I'd get something with specs like I described.
Title: Re: Computer OS advice wanted.
Post by: Quantos on August 15, 2009, 06:51:17 PM
That's an okay price to pay for it.  As long as it works anyway :)
Title: Re: Computer OS advice wanted.
Post by: Cityscape on August 15, 2009, 08:22:38 PM
That's an okay price to pay for it.  As long as it works anyway :)
Yeah, I thought is was decent.

I've seen computers with 600 Mhz CPU, 256 MB RAM, 25 GB HDD and similar specs being sold on ebay for over $100 dollars. Some people were actually dumb enough to buy them!!! It seems to be common on there. What do you think?

I could build myself a much better newer computer for that price tag.
Title: Re: Computer OS advice wanted.
Post by: truenorth on August 21, 2009, 04:45:00 PM
In my stable i have a Compaq Presario 1810 ($25.00) with wifi and wireless router,etc using XP home with 64 MB ram (expandable to 96 max) . Molasses in January will run faster. But given at the time i only really wanted the WIFI ability it does a reasonably good job on that for most things (not video of course).truenorth