Choose your favorite

[comda]

I have a computer running under 400MHz and wonder which os is the best meaning less problems the fastest............... Thanks!

[BC_Programmer]

How much memory?

My recommendation would be:

if you have less then 128MB, go with windows 95, 98, or 98SE-

if you have 128MB or More, use windows 2000.

with 256MB or more you might be alright running windows XP, too. Depending on the graphics adapter you might need to disable Luna for best performance.

[Allan]

I have a computer running under 400MHz and wonder which os is the best meaning less problems the fastest............... Thanks!

And you felt a poll was the best way to get your answer?

[patio]

I voted....
Course i also voted for Daley many times...early and often...

[Allan]

Senior?

[BC_Programmer]

I'm feeling a bit daft, so I think I'll vote for taft, hope he doesn't give us the shaft, and leave us in a raft.

Now whose up for a draught?

[patio]

Guinness ? ?

I'll buy...

[Computer_Commando]

How much memory?
My recommendation would be:
if you have less then 128MB, go with windows 95, 98, or 98SE-
if you have 128MB or More, use windows 2000.
with 256MB or more you might be alright running windows XP, too. Depending on the graphics adapter you might need to disable Luna for best performance.

I would recommend the same.

[Veltas]

How much memory?

My recommendation would be:

if you have less then 128MB, go with windows 95, 98, or 98SE-

if you have 128MB or More, use windows 2000.

with 256MB or more you might be alright running windows XP, too. Depending on the graphics adapter you might need to disable Luna for best performance.

*censored*, I'd just go for 2000 anyway, doesn't get much better than that, but I'd recommend 98 over 95 ANYDAY.

[BC_Programmer]

but I'd recommend 98 over 95 ANYDAY.

what about with 32MB of RAM?

[neelchauhan]

You should try to use Windows XP. If not use Windows 2000.

[Carbon Dudeoxide]

My favorite in that list is Windows 2000.

[patio]

You should try to use Windows XP. If not use Windows 2000.

Classic.

[talldude123]

No matter what hardware, anything under 400Mhz will handle Windows 2000. I once had a 233Mhz computer, 128MB RAM, and a 10GB Hard disk, and Intel 82810 graphics 8MB, ran Windows 2000 without a hitch. Only problem is that it's quite "Boring"

[Veltas]

what about with 32MB of RAM?

If it can't run 98 then there's not much you can do other than install 95.