Welcome guest. Before posting on our computer help forum, you must register. Click here it's easy and free.

Author Topic: "Fastest"...!? Isn't this a superlative? I suppose not?!  (Read 15795 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mr-bisquit

  • Guest
Re: "Fastest"...!? Isn't this a superlative? I suppose not?!
« Reply #30 on: April 19, 2010, 10:22:42 PM »
Same machine
FreeBSD
Browser: Firefox
Quote
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total:                 2587.0ms +/- 6.7%
--------------------------------------------

  3d:                   387.0ms +/- 2.5%
    cube:               114.0ms +/- 5.8%
    morph:               91.4ms +/- 0.7%
    raytrace:           181.6ms +/- 2.8%

  access:               346.8ms +/- 3.5%
    binary-trees:        90.2ms +/- 1.8%
    fannkuch:           159.8ms +/- 5.3%
    nbody:               77.6ms +/- 8.7%
    nsieve:              19.2ms +/- 2.9%

  bitops:                73.8ms +/- 3.7%
    3bit-bits-in-byte:    2.8ms +/- 57.9%
    bits-in-byte:        14.4ms +/- 4.7%
    bitwise-and:          2.8ms +/- 19.9%
    nsieve-bits:         53.8ms +/- 3.0%

  controlflow:           73.0ms +/- 1.2%
    recursive:           73.0ms +/- 1.2%

  crypto:               140.4ms +/- 5.2%
    aes:                 78.6ms +/- 4.3%
    md5:                 40.2ms +/- 4.0%
    sha1:                21.6ms +/- 14.4%

  date:                 448.0ms +/- 22.4%
    format-tofte:       237.0ms +/- 21.1%
    format-xparb:       211.0ms +/- 24.0%

  math:                 203.4ms +/- 35.1%
    cordic:             118.4ms +/- 47.9%
    partial-sums:        64.8ms +/- 22.8%
    spectral-norm:       20.2ms +/- 17.6%

  regexp:               147.6ms +/- 22.4%
    dna:                147.6ms +/- 22.4%

  string:               767.0ms +/- 2.8%
    base64:              42.0ms +/- 3.6%
    fasta:              172.8ms +/- 3.0%
    tagcloud:           216.2ms +/- 4.8%
    unpack-code:        247.8ms +/- 4.6%
    validate-input:      88.2ms +/- 18.5%

mr-bisquit

  • Guest
Re: "Fastest"...!? Isn't this a superlative? I suppose not?!
« Reply #31 on: April 19, 2010, 10:24:20 PM »
I absolutely hate Konqueror.
Yeah, but you can see all of the nasty cookies with it.

mr-bisquit

  • Guest
Re: "Fastest"...!? Isn't this a superlative? I suppose not?!
« Reply #32 on: April 19, 2010, 10:25:18 PM »
See. It also depends on the OS, settings, build, etc.
The same machine gives three different outputs for the same browser. Iceweasel is a rebranded firefox.
Total:                 2587.0ms +/- 6.7%  Firefox35
Total:                 11212.0ms +/- 25.4% Iceweasel
Total:                  7558.6ms +/- 2.2% Firefox3


When you look at it, the test is even more skewed.


And I am running other processes at the same time.

soybean



    Genius
  • The first soybean ever to learn the computer.
  • Thanked: 469
  • Computer: Specs
  • Experience: Experienced
  • OS: Windows 10
Re: "Fastest"...!? Isn't this a superlative? I suppose not?!
« Reply #33 on: April 20, 2010, 08:23:42 AM »
Quote from: mr-bisquit link=topic=102791.msg700231#msg700231
When you look at it, the test is even more skewed.

How so?

mr-bisquit

  • Guest
Re: "Fastest"...!? Isn't this a superlative? I suppose not?!
« Reply #34 on: April 20, 2010, 10:16:12 AM »
How so?
It's done only  on one operating system. That's the first.
It isn't done under real world circumstances. That's the second.
It isn't done under different connection speeds. That's the third.

I'll run the same tests later on the G3 and post them.

Since my amd64 is shot to *censored*, I can't run the tests on that architecture.
I can run them on my laptop and maybe under other circumstances. Say, perhaps, a poor ppoe connection.

I don't run konqueror unsecured.



mr-bisquit

  • Guest
Re: "Fastest"...!? Isn't this a superlative? I suppose not?!
« Reply #35 on: April 20, 2010, 10:00:12 PM »
Debian  G3/750 400mHz 384M RAM
Browser Kazahakase
Code: [Select]
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total:                 31374.8ms +/- 0.6%
--------------------------------------------

  3d:                   3856.6ms +/- 1.8%
    cube:               1418.8ms +/- 2.9%
    morph:              1393.2ms +/- 7.4%
    raytrace:           1044.6ms +/- 1.4%

  access:               4530.4ms +/- 2.4%
    binary-trees:        499.2ms +/- 8.8%
    fannkuch:           1799.8ms +/- 0.5%
    nbody:              1459.4ms +/- 5.9%
    nsieve:              772.0ms +/- 0.4%

  bitops:               3470.2ms +/- 0.4%
    3bit-bits-in-byte:   595.2ms +/- 1.0%
    bits-in-byte:        851.2ms +/- 1.7%
    bitwise-and:         862.8ms +/- 1.0%
    nsieve-bits:        1161.0ms +/- 0.4%

  controlflow:           419.0ms +/- 2.1%
    recursive:           419.0ms +/- 2.1%

  crypto:               1899.4ms +/- 0.5%
    aes:                 733.0ms +/- 1.2%
    md5:                 584.4ms +/- 1.1%
    sha1:                582.0ms +/- 2.5%

  date:                 3588.2ms +/- 1.4%
    format-tofte:       2104.6ms +/- 1.8%
    format-xparb:       1483.6ms +/- 2.0%

  math:                 3615.4ms +/- 3.4%
    cordic:             1400.4ms +/- 0.8%
    partial-sums:       1439.0ms +/- 9.1%
    spectral-norm:       776.0ms +/- 0.6%

  regexp:               1985.0ms +/- 4.4%
    dna:                1985.0ms +/- 4.4%

  string:               8010.6ms +/- 0.3%
    base64:             1017.6ms +/- 2.2%
    fasta:              2153.6ms +/- 0.6%
    tagcloud:           1509.4ms +/- 2.5%
    unpack-code:        2180.4ms +/- 0.6%
    validate-input:     1149.6ms +/- 0.9%

mr-bisquit

  • Guest
Re: "Fastest"...!? Isn't this a superlative? I suppose not?!
« Reply #36 on: April 20, 2010, 10:20:10 PM »
Same system PPC processor
Iceweasel
Code: [Select]
============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total:                 32972.0ms +/- 19.3%
--------------------------------------------

  3d:                   3718.4ms +/- 8.2%
    cube:               1349.0ms +/- 6.6%
    morph:              1327.4ms +/- 8.5%
    raytrace:           1042.0ms +/- 11.5%

  access:               4245.2ms +/- 4.6%
    binary-trees:        466.0ms +/- 11.0%
    fannkuch:           1735.8ms +/- 0.4%
    nbody:              1304.2ms +/- 7.4%
    nsieve:              739.2ms +/- 28.2%

  bitops:               3641.0ms +/- 34.4%
    3bit-bits-in-byte:   601.2ms +/- 35.0%
    bits-in-byte:        881.0ms +/- 29.9%
    bitwise-and:         883.2ms +/- 29.2%
    nsieve-bits:        1275.6ms +/- 40.7%

  controlflow:           414.8ms +/- 44.3%
    recursive:           414.8ms +/- 44.3%

  crypto:               2014.0ms +/- 41.2%
    aes:                 773.4ms +/- 38.7%
    md5:                 623.6ms +/- 43.0%
    sha1:                617.0ms +/- 42.5%

  date:                 4237.6ms +/- 48.1%
    format-tofte:       2555.8ms +/- 48.3%
    format-xparb:       1681.8ms +/- 47.9%

  math:                 4002.8ms +/- 44.0%
    cordic:             1596.2ms +/- 46.2%
    partial-sums:       1557.4ms +/- 40.7%
    spectral-norm:       849.2ms +/- 46.2%

  regexp:               2042.8ms +/- 18.5%
    dna:                2042.8ms +/- 18.5%

  string:               8655.4ms +/- 30.1%
    base64:              947.2ms +/- 5.9%
    fasta:              2105.4ms +/- 1.1%
    tagcloud:           1777.4ms +/- 46.8%
    unpack-code:        2547.0ms +/- 47.1%
    validate-input:     1278.4ms +/- 46.7%