Welcome guest. Before posting on our computer help forum, you must register. Click here it's easy and free.

Author Topic: thermal compound  (Read 10070 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

rthompson80819



    Specialist

    Thanked: 94
  • Experience: Experienced
  • OS: Windows 7
Re: thermal compound
« Reply #15 on: December 26, 2010, 05:55:01 PM »
Something nobody has mentioned so far is that thermal grease needs to retain temperature transference for a long time.  If it turns to dust after six months, and loses half of it's heat transference, it is worthless.  This is one of those things where you should spend a little more for a proven product.

Geek-9pm


    Mastermind
  • Geek After Dark
  • Thanked: 1026
    • Gekk9pm bnlog
  • Certifications: List
  • Computer: Specs
  • Experience: Expert
  • OS: Windows 10
Re: thermal compound
« Reply #16 on: December 26, 2010, 06:02:58 PM »
I love arguments that basically say "science has proven you wrong" with no actual links to these "experiments" or "testing" that claim to do so.
Yeah that is sort of a no brainer.

Wrong. different compounds have different heat capacitance.
Sorry, I thought we were talking about facts, no personal beliefs.

The facts are clear. It has already been done. There is litter or no difference the the end result. The advantage is not significant or even non measurable. The difference is close to the margin of error of the experiment. Please give a reference that shows actual real measurable results, not a lot of theoretical maybe this or maybe that.
Given, some compounds are better thermal conductors., True. That can be shown
Therefore we should use the better compounds. False,. That  is a premise that there would be a significant difference in actual piratical test on real PC. Not so. No significant difference has been found by anybody who knows how to read a thermometer. I do not mean to insult you BC, but I have to conclude that you have never worked in any kind of research and development t with actual materials.


Sorry if I have blasphemed your worship of the thermal goo God. I did not want to get into religionor this forum. I want to talk only about scientific fact.

Geek-9pm


    Mastermind
  • Geek After Dark
  • Thanked: 1026
    • Gekk9pm bnlog
  • Certifications: List
  • Computer: Specs
  • Experience: Expert
  • OS: Windows 10
Re: thermal compound
« Reply #17 on: December 26, 2010, 06:04:41 PM »
Something nobody has mentioned so far is that thermal grease needs to retain temperature transference for a long time.  If it turns to dust after six months, and loses half of it's heat transference, it is worthless.  This is one of those things where you should spend a little more for a proven product.
Exactly!   :)

Fed

  • Moderator


  • Sage
  • Thanked: 35
    • Experience: Experienced
    • OS: Windows XP
    Re: thermal compound
    « Reply #18 on: December 26, 2010, 06:06:03 PM »
    Quote
    heat capacitance
    Not a term I've ever heard of before, what units does it come in?

    moro

    • Guest
    Re: thermal compound
    « Reply #19 on: December 26, 2010, 06:13:55 PM »

    Fed

    • Moderator


    • Sage
    • Thanked: 35
      • Experience: Experienced
      • OS: Windows XP
      Re: thermal compound
      « Reply #20 on: December 26, 2010, 06:15:17 PM »
      Quote
      heat capacitance

      JJ 3000



        Egghead
      • Thanked: 237
      • Experience: Familiar
      • OS: Linux variant
      Re: thermal compound
      « Reply #21 on: December 26, 2010, 06:17:09 PM »
      I want to talk only about scientific fact.

      Okay. You say that this has been proven in a laboratory. What laboratory? What scientists? What journal were the results published in? And don't give a link to some crackpot on the internet. I could give you links to people claiming all sorts of ridiculous things. It doesn't make them true. An actual scientific journal, with a real paper written by a real scientist, will suffice.
      Save a Life!
      Adopt a homeless pet.
      http://www.petfinder.com/

      moro

      • Guest
      Re: thermal compound
      « Reply #22 on: December 26, 2010, 06:18:23 PM »
       :)
      heat  physical quantity
      capacitance electrical quantity

      Fed

      • Moderator


      • Sage
      • Thanked: 35
        • Experience: Experienced
        • OS: Windows XP
        Re: thermal compound
        « Reply #23 on: December 26, 2010, 06:29:03 PM »
        Quote
        heat  physical quantity
        capacitance electrical quantity
        Degreewatts.... Watt? :D

        jackal88k

          Topic Starter


          Beginner
          • sing in for free stuff
        • Experience: Experienced
        • OS: Windows XP
        Re: thermal compound
        « Reply #24 on: December 26, 2010, 10:39:23 PM »
        Arctic Silver.
        Hands down....
        what about tuniq tx-4 is that good too?.....can i use arctic silver on every computer if im not overclocking?

        BC_Programmer


          Mastermind
        • Typing is no substitute for thinking.
        • Thanked: 1140
          • Yes
          • Yes
          • BC-Programming.com
        • Certifications: List
        • Computer: Specs
        • Experience: Beginner
        • OS: Windows 11
        Re: thermal compound
        « Reply #25 on: December 26, 2010, 10:56:19 PM »
        what about tuniq tx-4 is that good too?.....can i use arctic silver on every computer if im not overclocking?
        Basically:
        Metal-Based is better then Ceramic Based is better then... whatever other stuff there is.

        Missed geek's previous reply, but JJ3000 pretty much responded with the same thing I would have said.

        Sorry, I thought we were talking about facts, no personal beliefs.
        everybody but you is in fact dealing in fact. You truly think we should just believe you because you say "this is fact"? Not going to happen. provide LINKS TO THESE STUDIES. just saying that "research has been done and proven you wrong" isn't an argument in and of itself without actually showing that the research has been done. And again as JJ says don't link us to some crackpot who is actually presenting alternative theories (much like yourself, what with your clearly untested theory that toothpaste is as effective as any other thermal paste. By the same token I could say that I could just use water to lubricate heavy machinery.

        Quote
        The facts are clear. It has already been done. There is litter or no difference the the end result. The advantage is not significant or even non measurable. The difference is close to the margin of error of the experiment.
        By who? the magical toothpaste fairy that only you can see?

        Quote
        Please give a reference that shows actual real measurable results, not a lot of theoretical maybe this or maybe that.
        What the *censored* do you think YOU ARE BEING ASKED FOR? what are we supposed to just believe your utter bull crap about how toothpaste is just as effective at absorbing and diverting heat energy? have you ever actually heated toothpaste? do you know what happens? it dries out. It becomes an insulator at that point. So much for your theory about toothpaste.

        Quote
        Given, some compounds are better thermal conductors., True. That can be shown

        Quote
        Therefore we should use the better compounds. False,.

        Despite your assertions to the contrary, that actually would logically follow. If some compounds conduct heat better then others then those compounds are going to work better in applications that require the conduction of heat. It's basic bloody logic.

        Quote
        That  is a premise that there would be a significant difference in actual piratical test on real PC. Not so. No significant difference has been found by anybody who knows how to read a thermometer.
        Speedfan disagree with you, as do all the various BIOS temp readings I've done after reapplying paste to GPU's and CPUs that were using the basic grease. Metal-based thermal compounds conduct heat better. therefore they work better. In most cases a difference of ten degrees can be seen.

        Quote
        I want to talk only about scientific fact.
        Right. When do you plan to start doing this exactly?
        I was trying to dereference Null Pointers before it was cool.

        mroilfield



          Mentor
        • Thanked: 42
          • Yes
          • Yes
        • Computer: Specs
        • Experience: Experienced
        • OS: Windows 11
        Re: thermal compound
        « Reply #26 on: December 26, 2010, 11:38:28 PM »
        Quote
        For example, you could go to the drugstore and buy a compound that contains zinc oxide and try it as a heat sink compound. Surprise! You try and try and you would find that there is virtually no difference between just plain zinc oxide compound and almost any other kind of compounded to think of.

        Geek-9pm,

        Are you saying that I could use strawberry jam, peanut butter, anti-biotic ointment, or just anything that I can spread thinly and get to stay in place and they would all work as good as actual thermal compounds that are made for this actual purpose?
        You can't fix Stupid!!!

        Geek-9pm


          Mastermind
        • Geek After Dark
        • Thanked: 1026
          • Gekk9pm bnlog
        • Certifications: List
        • Computer: Specs
        • Experience: Expert
        • OS: Windows 10
        Re: thermal compound
        « Reply #27 on: December 27, 2010, 10:26:07 AM »
        Geek-9pm,

        Are you saying that I could use strawberry jam, peanut butter, anti-biotic ointment, or just anything that I can spread thinly and get to stay in place and they would all work as good as actual thermal compounds that are made for this actual purpose?
        No, that would be in bad taste.   ::)
        ======================================================
        Well, I did consider coming back with whole bunch of links to this and that over here and over there and all that kind of stuff. And after thinking it over, the olOP deserves a decent answer.
        It started when I made a remark and then the dynamic duel came back with their answers that they knew would do irk me. And then I made a***sigh***and patio put me on his black list. Or maybe it was a silver list, I'm not sure.
        Anyway, my objection was that people would make a recommendation for a very specific product without giving any reason why other than it is allegedly the best of its kind.
        For my rebuttal I would recommend that anybody considering using arctic silver and five should go to the Arctic Silver website and read up on the instructions for installing any of their products. The material on the website is quite conservative and very accurate. Anybody who was not done the Heatsik Hula at least once needs to read the material over. And even people of the industry still should read the article over and learn what the company itself says of the products.
        I would have no problem with the OP deciding to use any of the Arctic Silver products. I recommend he reads over information is found on the website, especially with regard to using the Arctic Silver five.
        As for the other issues, we can carry this on and on, I have about 3000 different sources and I'm still wading through. But I don't think it would be productive to post even a fraction of them here. Just too much information

        jackal88k

          Topic Starter


          Beginner
          • sing in for free stuff
        • Experience: Experienced
        • OS: Windows XP
        Re: thermal compound
        « Reply #28 on: December 27, 2010, 10:33:51 AM »
        I also like arctic silver, if you're still interested jakal88k.
        can i use arctic silver on every computer if I'm not overclocking?

        Salmon Trout

        • Guest
        Re: thermal compound
        « Reply #29 on: December 27, 2010, 11:53:22 AM »
        Months ago I found a comparative test that an Australian guy did. He tests CPU coolers and other hardware and publishes the results on his hardware and gadget review site. He used the same rig that he uses to test coolers - a electrically heated block which delivers a measured amount of power in Watts, containing a temperature probe, and another thermometer to measure the ambient air temperature. The difference between the two temperatures (the "delta-T") divided by the heat in Watts gives the thermal transference of the setup in °C/W

        http://www.dansdata.com/goop.htm

        He tried Arctic Silver 3 two ways, first in "More Is Better" style, putting on a half-millimetre layer of the stuff. "Lots of people over-apply thermal grease, and I wanted to see what difference it might make." Then he scraped most of it off and redid the test.

        Vegemite is a kind of savoury (British & Commonwealth spelling) spread made from yeast. UK people can use Marmite instead.

        Results (lower is better)

        Code: [Select]
        No compound at all                0.66°C/W.
        White zinc oxide thermal compound 0.50°C/W.
        Arctic Silver 3 thick layer       0.50°C/W.
        Arctic Silver 3 thin layer        0.48°C/W
        Arctic Alumina                    0.50°C/W.
        Cooler Master PTK-001             0.48°C/W
        Cooler Master HTK-001             0.50°C/W
        Nanotherm Blue after application  0.56°C/W.
        Nanotherm Blue left overnight     0.51°C/W.
        Toothpaste                        0.47°C/W.
        Vegemite                          0.48°C/W
        Plain water                       0.41°C/W

        So any compound at all is better than none, and the difference between expensive and cheap compounds is insignificant. He only used the joke items, Vegemite, toothpaste and water, to illustrate that almost anything between the cpu and cooler is going to aid heat transfer. Of course these substances are going to dry out pretty quickly and become useless or worse than useless.

        He did note that if you are doing lots of cpu & heatsink tests and you are going to take the cooler off again in a few hours, you may as well use toothpaste to save money.

        He also notes that if you think that choice of heatsink compound is going to make the difference between overheating and not overheating you must be running a pretty *censored* marginal system.

        I was involved in electronic manufacturing for 20 years and his methods and results look good to me. I think that the market in heatsink compound is one of those "toys for guys" things, and also there is a good amount of superstition involved, similar to carrying a rabbits foot or 4-leaf clover to prevent bad luck.