I don't have time for the amount of things i could say.
And yet here you are.
Whether my specific terminology may be slightly off I still know what i am talking about
Onus of proof is on the claimant.
ght;
and my point has not been affected.
It's been demolished, swept in the trash and taken to the dump.
My experience lies in all around computing, admittedly mostly with windows software. I taught myself how to program. I can walk into a job as a network admin tomorrow having never worked the job and still be confident in my abilities.
Err... good for you? Are you saying this for your own benefit? Am I supposed to be enraged, or something? If you want I can pretend that I think you are better than me and record myself sobbing quietly so you can sleep, if that's necessary.
I corrected major flaws in what you said and all you can seem to focus on is the way i use the term virtual memory.
Actually, I also conceded on those flaws. You must have missed that with all the rage flowing through you at seeing I had the utter audacity to question you about anything. As I said, it was all grabbed from my memory, sometimes it get's mixed up with other stuff, possibly the same thing that had you referring to the pagefile as Virtual Memory, though at least in that case a lot of (inaccurate) literature does that too.
Of Course I was wrong about programs being able to discover the size of the page file, but what I meant, was as part of the Memory Management API; Unlike Mac OS (Classic) for example, whether a Pagefile is in use or not is not a fundamental piece of information directly accessible via the Memory management functions; one needs to import other libs and call a mess of other functions (or inspect the Performance key) to get at that data.
That is more useless than the topic of this thread.
Actually, it's quite relevant; my problem isn't that you made that teensy mistake, since I did accidentally mix up Virtual Address Space with Virtual Memory for some parts of my original post. it was that- even after being told the proper term, you continued to use it, and smash it's definition together with both the pagefile as well as Virtual Address Space. I now believe that you either did this on purpose, or are a moron. Most likely the former.
I have the skills and means to create very useful and very profitable applications from scratch.
Why are you trying so hard to convince... somebody... of this? You cite overbearing confidence but your side-bets give away your hand.
I have done so already.
Yeah, I used to have those dreams too. Then one day it was real. Although I must say the reality is not quite as fantastic as the dreams let on. On the bright side, at least now my computer screen doesn't try to eat me if my code compiles with errors. It's a mixed bag.
I have been programming since i was 12.
K.
Computers is what i do.
Grammar are not. Sorry had to get that in there.
Building, fixing, programming, web design, all the way to graphic design. When it has to do with computers, i know my stuff.
OK. This would be the place where you expect me to care and say "prove it"- which would be a fair response. However, I don't really care. You are already trying pretty *censored* hard to convince somebody- possibly yourself of this, I wouldn't want to burden you with actually having to demonstrate anything. I imagine you are trying to goad me into doing the same thing and listing off a bunch of stuff I'm good at, but I won't, because I don't see the point.
I don't have to prove my skills here.
You're the one who started to ramble about skills and formatting floppies and whatnot. And your diatribes about booting DOS floppies when you were 9-10 years old seem a lot like you are trying to prove... something.
I could put my time to better use actually using my skills
And yet here you are.
at least programming-wise, seem to be superior to yours.
basing a conclusion on incomplete data. An interesting approach.
EDIT: HAHA! And he's STILL posting his "histories"! COMEDY GOLD!