Welcome guest. Before posting on our computer help forum, you must register. Click here it's easy and free.

Author Topic: New to Networking  (Read 11216 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

overthehill

    Topic Starter


    Apprentice

  • Keep Canada beautiful. Swallow your beer cans.
  • Thanked: 14
    • Yes
    • Yes
  • Experience: Familiar
  • OS: Windows Vista
New to Networking
« on: May 29, 2012, 04:05:58 PM »
Hi Folks looking for help with my networking.

I just recently had DSL installed (wasn't available previously in my area.) Then, just the other day I had my ISP return to install a router. (Kids idea, birthday present.) I have absolutely no experience with a router.
(The router probably knows more about me than I know about it.) So you get the idea, I need help.
I have many assumptions in this post, so please feel free to correct those that require correcting.

Here are my concerns;
a) as my laptop (wireless)  gets further and further from the router the bandwidth speed decreases, (probably normal). It gets to the point (especially when running on internal power) that at approx. 70 ft. I experience some buffering when watching on-line videos etc. When checking speeds on the connected desktop the speeds typically run around 6.5 Mbps download, 0.70 Mbps upload.. The laptop when close to the router, runs at approx. 5.0 Mbps down. When used in my bedroom approx. 70 ft. away with external power I achieve 2.50 – 3.5 Mbps. With internal power (battery fully charged) some speeds observed as low as 1.7 Mbps.

So my question is; if I was to hardwire the laptop to the router, would my speeds improve? I would like to have both(wired and wireless) if this is conceivable. I’d like to run the laptop either wired (when required) or wireless when closer to the router.
If the wired option is possible do things have to be configured or is it a simple plug- in?
Oh !. If the wired option will work , I have approx. 100ft. of cat5e cable left by my previous ISP and it wouldn't be very difficult to install. I'm assuming that the cat5e cable could act as an Ethernet cable?. If so, would it be RJ-45 connectors that I would require? I ask this because I have a Ethernet cable that connects easily to the router. On the other hand the connector that I cut off of the cat5e cable does not appear to fit into the router?.
       
b) second concern is with the printer. When the ISP tech. was installing the router I asked about connecting the laptop to the printer. His answer was if the printer is not a wireless printer then it couldn't be done. Since then I've seen info. in some of the threads here (or links provided) that most printers can be setup to run from a wireless connected PC. No ports on the printer provided for this.  So, I'm wondering?
         
         Thanking you in advance for your help, overthehill


Laptop (Win XP) - TravelMate 2420

Desktop (Vista)  -  Dual Core Intel Pentium D, 2800 MHz

Printer - HP Office Jet J4580

Router - Actiontec GT724WG  4 LAN Ports.  Only (# 2 ) presently in use.


             

truenorth



    Guru

    Thanked: 253
    Re: New to Networking
    « Reply #1 on: May 30, 2012, 11:22:06 AM »
    Well there is quite a bit in your post so i hope i'll hit all the bases.Yes you can run both wireless and wired connections to the router.The distances you are mentioning re the wireless efficiency issues are appropriate (unless compensated for by additional hardware--which is possible). What you are actually experiencing is signal loss over distance.If you don't have an issue with wired that will solve it. Your Ethernet connection on your computer and the router should be the same and a cat5 cable should work for both. You can make the non wireless printer capable of becoming wireless with additional hardware and even share the printer with more than one computer if so desired. There are optional signal booster antennae available to improve the signal strength over greater distances.There are also WI-fi reception antennae with software that can be added to the usb ports of computers to increase the signal reception of computers. I have used such a device on a laptop for years when traveling and accessing public WI-fi sites with very acceptable results. Did i cover all your points?truenorth

    Computer_Commando



      Hacker
    • Thanked: 494
    • Certifications: List
    • Computer: Specs
    • Experience: Expert
    • OS: Windows 10
    Re: New to Networking
    « Reply #2 on: May 30, 2012, 11:35:08 AM »
    ...
    Here are my concerns;
    a) as my laptop (wireless)  gets further and further from the router the bandwidth speed decreases, (probably normal). It gets to the point (especially when running on internal power) that at approx. 70 ft. I experience some buffering when watching on-line videos etc. When checking speeds on the connected desktop the speeds typically run around 6.5 Mbps download, 0.70 Mbps upload.. The laptop when close to the router, runs at approx. 5.0 Mbps down. When used in my bedroom approx. 70 ft. away with external power I achieve 2.50 – 3.5 Mbps. With internal power (battery fully charged) some speeds observed as low as 1.7 Mbps.

    So my question is;

    1.  if I was to hardwire the laptop to the router, would my speeds improve?
    2.  I would like to have both(wired and wireless) if this is conceivable. I’d like to run the laptop either wired (when required) or wireless when closer to the router.
    3.  If the wired option is possible do things have to be configured or is it a simple plug- in?
    ...
    4.  I'm assuming that the cat5e cable could act as an Ethernet cable?.
    5.  If so, would it be RJ-45 connectors that I would require?
    6.  I ask this because I have a Ethernet cable that connects easily to the router. On the other hand the connector that I cut off of the cat5e cable does not appear to fit into the router?.
           
    7.  second concern is with the printer. When the ISP tech. was installing the router I asked about connecting the laptop to the printer. His answer was if the printer is not a wireless printer then it couldn't be done. Since then I've seen info. in some of the threads here (or links provided) that most printers can be setup to run from a wireless connected PC. No ports on the printer provided for this.  So, I'm wondering?
             
             Thanking you in advance for your help, overthehill


    Laptop (Win XP) - TravelMate 2420

    Desktop (Vista)  -  Dual Core Intel Pentium D, 2800 MHz

    Printer - HP Office Jet J4580

    Router - Actiontec GT724WG  4 LAN Ports.  Only (# 2 ) presently in use.
    Your distance/speed issue could be due to WiFi connection being 802.11g instead of 802.11n .  Most new routers are b/g &n.  Many DSL combo modems/routers are b/g only, so there is nothing you can do about the WiFi speed.  802.11n has much greater range & speed.

    1.  I believe so.
    2.  Yes.
    3.  Just plug it in.
    4.  Cat5e cable is one type of ethernet cable.
    5.  Yes, but you can't use the old connectors you cut off.
    6.  The cat5e cable you have sounds like a telephone/DSL cable, 4 or 6 conductor instead of 8 conductor.
    7.  Your printer is USB.  You would need a print server to convert the USB to ethernet

    overthehill

      Topic Starter


      Apprentice

    • Keep Canada beautiful. Swallow your beer cans.
    • Thanked: 14
      • Yes
      • Yes
    • Experience: Familiar
    • OS: Windows Vista
    Re: New to Networking
    « Reply #3 on: May 30, 2012, 12:46:37 PM »
    Well there is quite a bit in your post so i hope i'll hit all the bases.Yes you can run both wireless and wired connections to the router.The distances you are mentioning re the wireless efficiency issues are appropriate (unless compensated for by additional hardware--which is possible). What you are actually experiencing is signal loss over distance.If you don't have an issue with wired that will solve it. Your Ethernet connection on your computer and the router should be the same and a cat5 cable should work for both. You can make the non wireless printer capable of becoming wireless with additional hardware and even share the printer with more than one computer if so desired. There are optional signal booster antennae available to improve the signal strength over greater distances.There are also WI-fi reception antennae with software that can be added to the usb ports of computers to increase the signal reception of computers. I have used such a device on a laptop for years when traveling and accessing public WI-fi sites with very acceptable results. Did i cover all your points?truenorth

    Thanks truenorth
     
    Yes you answered my questions. I now have a better understanding. I realize there was a lot of questions but I thought that I'd throw them all out there instead of a number of posts. ;)  overthehill


                 

    overthehill

      Topic Starter


      Apprentice

    • Keep Canada beautiful. Swallow your beer cans.
    • Thanked: 14
      • Yes
      • Yes
    • Experience: Familiar
    • OS: Windows Vista
    Re: New to Networking
    « Reply #4 on: May 30, 2012, 01:25:12 PM »
    Your distance/speed issue could be due to WiFi connection being 802.11g instead of 802.11n .  Most new routers are b/g &n.  Many DSL combo modems/routers are b/g only, so there is nothing you can do about the WiFi speed.  802.11n has much greater range & speed.

    1.  I believe so.
    2.  Yes.
    3.  Just plug it in.
    4.  Cat5e cable is one type of ethernet cable.
    5.  Yes, but you can't use the old connectors you cut off.
    6.  The cat5e cable you have sounds like a telephone/DSL cable, 4 or 6 conductor instead of 8 conductor.
    7.  Your printer is USB.  You would need a print server to convert the USB to ethernet

    Thanks CC. I like the way that you sorted my questions out.

    Between truenorth's input and yours I now know many of my  options.

    From your reply I now have another router question though. If I understand properly my ISP could have set-up a 802.11n
    combo modem/router instead of the 802.11g. Do I understand properly?

    The Cat5e cable that I have is actually a 4/pr cable. What I found interesting though was as I mentioned. The cut off end ( I do realize these are a one time only crimp) does just not fit(for some reason) into any ports in the router. It did come out of the port on my PC so that was the reason I asked whether or not I required RJ-45 connectors?.

    Think I'll just print from my desktop.

    Thanks again.overthehill


                 

    Computer_Commando



      Hacker
    • Thanked: 494
    • Certifications: List
    • Computer: Specs
    • Experience: Expert
    • OS: Windows 10
    Re: New to Networking
    « Reply #5 on: May 31, 2012, 07:17:54 AM »
    ...
    From your reply I now have another router question though. If I understand properly my ISP could have set-up a 802.11n
    combo modem/router instead of the 802.11g. Do I understand properly?

    The Cat5e cable that I have is actually a 4/pr cable. What I found interesting though was as I mentioned. The cut off end ( I do realize these are a one time only crimp) does just not fit(for some reason) into any ports in the router. It did come out of the port on my PC so that was the reason I asked whether or not I required RJ-45 connectors?...
    DSL & cable have different tiers (speed plans) of service.  Depending on your tier 802.11g may be more that adequate.  In my area, we have AT&T & I can see all the modem/routers in my area from my wifi laptop.  DSL's are easy to spot because all are 2Wire & have a name like 2Wire1234 & all are 802.11g.
    Your modem/router is a 'g'.  http://www.actiontec.com/products/product.php?pid=39
    Almost all DSL modems contain a router.  Almost, if not all, cable modems do not contain a router.  It is a separate box.
    Cable is much faster than DSL, by the nature of shielded cable having more bandwidth than unshielded twisted pair (UTP).  Peel back the insulation on the ethernet cable & see the twisting of the individual pairs.  This is how the speed is determined.

    Fiberoptic is a completely different beast.  It's called FIOS:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_FiOS
    Light has much greater bandwidth.
    See Internet speed tiers:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT%26T_U-verse
    Cable is still faster:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOCSIS

    Telephone uses RJ-11 connectors, ethernet uses RJ-45 connectors.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Registered_jack
    Router LAN ports are RJ-45.  Sometimes they are a very tight fit.  I've had some that were so tight, they would not release without pliers.  Any cable that is that tight, I throw away.

    overthehill

      Topic Starter


      Apprentice

    • Keep Canada beautiful. Swallow your beer cans.
    • Thanked: 14
      • Yes
      • Yes
    • Experience: Familiar
    • OS: Windows Vista
    Re: New to Networking
    « Reply #6 on: May 31, 2012, 09:33:37 AM »
    DSL & cable have different tiers (speed plans) of service.  Depending on your tier 802.11g may be more that adequate.  In my area, we have AT&T & I can see all the modem/routers in my area from my wifi laptop.  DSL's are easy to spot because all are 2Wire & have a name like 2Wire1234 & all are 802.11g.
    Your modem/router is a 'g'.  http://www.actiontec.com/products/product.php?pid=39
    Almost all DSL modems contain a router.  Almost, if not all, cable modems do not contain a router.  It is a separate box.
    Cable is much faster than DSL, by the nature of shielded cable having more bandwidth than unshielded twisted pair (UTP).  Peel back the insulation on the ethernet cable & see the twisting of the individual pairs.  This is how the speed is determined.

    Fiberoptic is a completely different beast.  It's called FIOS:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verizon_FiOS
    Light has much greater bandwidth.
    See Internet speed tiers:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT%26T_U-verse
    Cable is still faster:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOCSIS

    Telephone uses RJ-11 connectors, ethernet uses RJ-45 connectors.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Registered_jack
    Router LAN ports are RJ-45.  Sometimes they are a very tight fit.  I've had some that were so tight, they would not release without pliers.  Any cable that is that tight, I throw away.

    Thanks once again C_C. 

    So from your info.   
    1) because I have DSL I'll be content with my 802.11g
    2) I'll attach the RJ-45 connectors and run out the cable to test my laptop to see if the speeds increase before the actual install.
    3) Because now I'm sure, I too will throw out any RJ-45 connector that gives me a problem.

    But I still have another questionI came across this. 568A vs 568B . 
    Which conductor sequence do you suggest or does it matter?.

    568A, uses the following manner from left to right: white-green, green, white-orange, blue, blue-white, orange, white-brown and brown.

    For standard cat 5 B connections, 568B, uses from left to right: white-orange, orange, white-green, blue, white-blue, green, white-brown and brown.

    overthehill


                 

    truenorth



      Guru

      Thanked: 253
      Re: New to Networking
      « Reply #7 on: May 31, 2012, 04:30:57 PM »
      Just before we leave the modem/router references. In my case the DSL provider (Distributel Canada) provided a dsl modem which would require a wired connection to a computer. Since i wanted to be able to access the service from many computers (up to 7) i wanted the ability to do so simultaneously and wirelessly from various locations in the house. Thus it was my dime and necessity to purchase a router capable of transmission to the various computers. Because some computers were beyond good reception distance i then upgraded the provided antennae that came with the router to a more powerful one. My laptops had internal wi-fi capability built in but my desktops all required the purchase and installation of wireless adapters (also referred to as dongles). In the case of the laptop i took when traveling i found i could vastly improve the range and signal strength reception by adding a usb wi-fi extender antennae to the laptop. Just to give you the additional knowledge in case some of this may fit your circumstances and how they can be addressed. truenorth

      overthehill

        Topic Starter


        Apprentice

      • Keep Canada beautiful. Swallow your beer cans.
      • Thanked: 14
        • Yes
        • Yes
      • Experience: Familiar
      • OS: Windows Vista
      Re: New to Networking
      « Reply #8 on: May 31, 2012, 06:30:37 PM »
      Just before we leave the modem/router references. In my case the DSL provider (Distributel Canada) provided a dsl modem which would require a wired connection to a computer. Since i wanted to be able to access the service from many computers (up to 7) i wanted the ability to do so simultaneously and wirelessly from various locations in the house. Thus it was my dime and necessity to purchase a router capable of transmission to the various computers. Because some computers were beyond good reception distance i then upgraded the provided antennae that came with the router to a more powerful one. My laptops had internal wi-fi capability built in but my desktops all required the purchase and installation of wireless adapters (also referred to as dongles). In the case of the laptop i took when traveling i found i could vastly improve the range and signal strength reception by adding a usb wi-fi extender antennae to the laptop. Just to give you the additional knowledge in case some of this may fit your circumstances and how they can be addressed. truenorth

      Thanks truenorth. Great info. and something I'll keep in mind. The laptop that I currently have is outdated (but still working fine) and we don't typically travel much. I would like the capability though to be able to use my laptop throughout the house. Like I mentioned I've just purchased a number of RJ-45 connectors and my neighbor loaned me a Belkin crimper. I'll uncoil the cable and give it a trial run to see if in fact my speeds increase when I'm at the far end of my home. If this shows any significant increase in speed I'll certainly install the cable.
      Don't know at the moment either how much I'm prepared to spend on any additional hardware to accommodate an outdated PC. Before too long I'll probably be forced to bite the bullet and get something new anyway. And by then, the whole picture will have changed. For now this is by far the easiest and least expensive option.

      PS; Not sure too, what a more powerful antennae would do to my sound system. The router as it stands sends a constant clunking noise to my speakers. Enough that I'm still attempting to find proper placement.

      Regards, overthehill


                   

      BC_Programmer


        Mastermind
      • Typing is no substitute for thinking.
      • Thanked: 1140
        • Yes
        • Yes
        • BC-Programming.com
      • Certifications: List
      • Computer: Specs
      • Experience: Beginner
      • OS: Windows 11
      Re: New to Networking
      « Reply #9 on: May 31, 2012, 07:10:49 PM »
      In my case, I bought a router a few months before I even got internet; planning ahead, so to speak. I knew that if I got the internet first they'd either ding me for renting some crappy wireless-G router every month, or I'd have to get one anyway. So I got a rather nice Draft-N (wireless-N was draft at the time...) router, which also had gigabit LAN. I actually ran it wired only (though others in the house used the wifi and I didn't get any complaints) for about a year, until I got the laptop I'm typing on now, which I selected to have built-in wireless-N capability. The speed was really something; particularly network transfers between machines, which could use the full speed of the router. The internet itself was I believe 50mbps download and 10 mbps up.

      PS; Not sure too, what a more powerful antennae would do to my sound system. The router as it stands sends a constant clunking noise to my speakers. Enough that I'm still attempting to find proper placement.

      You haven't really described the sound system... I guess it's wireless? If so you could probably change it to use a different frequency.

      I have interference problems, too; first, my wireless card that was in my PC would sometimes interfere with the audio card circuitry. I was able to mitigate it somewhat by rearranging the connections, but I only have a few PCI slots and both cards are PCI so I couldn't move them very far apart. More recently the wireless-N card seems to have died, and I removed it from that PC. The sound issues were far less, but they still exist. I was however able to actually trace it to the speaker system itself, which is just a 2.1 system with two speakers and a subwoofer. It has an external volume control, and moving this around would change the intensity of the interference, and covering it with a CD, tin foil, or other electrically reflective material would deaden it too.

      The applicability to your situation- first, you have to try to find where the interference is occuring (assuming changing frequencies doesn't resolve your issue). In my case that "weak point" is the weakly shielded volume control. Then you simply have to "shield" it somehow. in my case I was able to just move that control a bit.

      On the other hand, in my case I wasn't picking up interference from a nearby wireless router since it hasn't been connected in some time. I was picking up interference from other stuff, like wireless routers, USB hubs, the electric motor on a desk fan, my monitor, and my USB TV Tuner. The biggest interferer I found was with a HTC smartphone I used for tethered net access a few times, which was so loud I had to shut off the speakers for the duration. (Sticking a CD or other metallic "shield" between it and the volume control and all was silent again).



      I was trying to dereference Null Pointers before it was cool.

      overthehill

        Topic Starter


        Apprentice

      • Keep Canada beautiful. Swallow your beer cans.
      • Thanked: 14
        • Yes
        • Yes
      • Experience: Familiar
      • OS: Windows Vista
      Re: New to Networking
      « Reply #10 on: May 31, 2012, 08:12:24 PM »

      You haven't really described the sound system... I guess it's wireless? If so you could probably change it to use a different frequency.


      Thanks BC_ for your input.
      Actually the speaker system is an inexpensive older wired Altec Lansing VS2421. I've been very satisfied with this system considering the cost. Actually it's had pretty fair reviews. Never had a concern with the system until the router was installed. The noise that I'm complaining about can be eliminated by moving the speakers away from the router. They're not where I would prefer but much better than shutting the speakers off or listening to that constant noise.The router though must lay flat on my desk. If I was to put it in the stand or hang it higher on the wall that's probably where I'd be ,up the wall. As I mentioned if the speakers are a distance away from (or even if they are placed higher than) the router, the racket seems to be eliminated. Actually with the way it is now the sound is quite tolerable and I should be able to make it better. But I'm afraid if I was to install a more powerful antennae I'd have to put the speakers in another room or perhaps hang them from the ceiling? overthehill


                   

      BC_Programmer


        Mastermind
      • Typing is no substitute for thinking.
      • Thanked: 1140
        • Yes
        • Yes
        • BC-Programming.com
      • Certifications: List
      • Computer: Specs
      • Experience: Beginner
      • OS: Windows 11
      Re: New to Networking
      « Reply #11 on: May 31, 2012, 08:53:54 PM »
      Thanks BC_ for your input.
      Actually the speaker system is an inexpensive older wired Altec Lansing VS2421.
      That is the same sound system I have. The external volume control appears to be a weak point as far as shielding from interference goes. I thought it was the speakers in my case as well, but then when I put a CD on the volume control thing for a second I noticed that the mild static dissappeared. I haven't had it close to an operating wireless router, but the wireless transmitter on my laptop seems to also cause interference (not as bad as the cellphone though). All interference seems to cease when I "shield" the volume control thing with something. If your interference is in fact between the router and speakers, you need to shield the speakers in some fashion. usually a metal component of some sort between the two would work too. If you get a better antenna it will likely be more mobile, so you could move it farther away.


      I was trying to dereference Null Pointers before it was cool.

      overthehill

        Topic Starter


        Apprentice

      • Keep Canada beautiful. Swallow your beer cans.
      • Thanked: 14
        • Yes
        • Yes
      • Experience: Familiar
      • OS: Windows Vista
      Re: New to Networking
      « Reply #12 on: May 31, 2012, 09:19:16 PM »
      That is the same sound system I have. The external volume control appears to be a weak point as far as shielding from interference goes. I thought it was the speakers in my case as well, but then when I put a CD on the volume control thing for a second I noticed that the mild static dissappeared. I haven't had it close to an operating wireless router, but the wireless transmitter on my laptop seems to also cause interference (not as bad as the cellphone though). All interference seems to cease when I "shield" the volume control thing with something. If your interference is in fact between the router and speakers, you need to shield the speakers in some fashion. usually a metal component of some sort between the two would work too. If you get a better antenna it will likely be more mobile, so you could move it farther away.

      Once again thanks BC_. I'll see what I can rig up. overthehill


                   

      overthehill

        Topic Starter


        Apprentice

      • Keep Canada beautiful. Swallow your beer cans.
      • Thanked: 14
        • Yes
        • Yes
      • Experience: Familiar
      • OS: Windows Vista
      Re: New to Networking
      « Reply #13 on: June 01, 2012, 10:17:40 PM »
      Back again and copied the Italicized from a previous message in this thread.

      (I would like the capability though to be able to use my laptop throughout the house. Like I mentioned I've just purchased a number of RJ-45 connectors and my neighbor loaned me a Belkin crimper. I'll uncoil the cable and give it a trial run to see if in fact my speeds increase when I'm at the far end of my home. If this shows any significant increase in speed I'll certainly install the cable.)

      Well I have no explanation for what took place. I got the connectors on the cable (approx.80 ft), ran the cable outside and connected it to my laptop. While connected the speeds were quite good(for my service anyway) 4.0 - 5.2 Mbps download. Wireless (again outside) ,2.0 - 3.0 down. At this point I thought that I had it made. Wrong. I brought the cable into the house, and ran it to the far end.
      Now wired, right around .8- 1.0 Mbps download. Totally disappointed. Connected wireless to the far end (inside) the numbers were very close to what they were outside. I couldn't understand this (still can't) so I went through the whole procedure again. Exactly the same results. How is it possible that when wired it works outside but not inside. Crazy.
      Just to check the router I took a 6ft. patch cable that I had , connected it to the router/ laptop and received a constant 6.4 Mbps. The same as what I receive from my wired desktop.
      At this point the only thing that I can think of doing is to cut off the connectors, check conds. for continuity, shorts and crosses (again) and replace the connectors. I do not have a tester.
      And, I realize that I could purchase a booster or ? to extend the range, but one day I may possibly want to put a wired desktop at the far end, so a cable would be nice.
      In any case, if not what I suggested, what else could the problem possibly be? overthehill

      PS Oh! and just for info., the cable is Outdoor Cat5e grease filled and when installing the connectors I followed the 568A standard.


                   

      overthehill

        Topic Starter


        Apprentice

      • Keep Canada beautiful. Swallow your beer cans.
      • Thanked: 14
        • Yes
        • Yes
      • Experience: Familiar
      • OS: Windows Vista
      Re: New to Networking
      « Reply #14 on: June 05, 2012, 10:37:04 PM »
      Update.
      Well I strung the cable (cat5e) and it works and it doesn't and I'm now sure that the problem is not the fault of the cable. If I remove the Ethernet cable from my desktop, use a coupler,then connect to my laptop(whether the Ethernet cable connected is 6ft. or 80 ft.) it works great. But, if the desktop is reconnected and another cable (whether 6ft. or 80 ft.) is plugged into the router(either port #1,#3 or #4) (port # 2 is used for the desktop) then connected to the laptop, speeds are less than 1.0 Mbps. I Emailed the manufacturer about this , got a response and no help whatsoever. Next I contacted my ISP support. He took met through all the hoops that he could think of and somehow finally got it to perform properly (then he quickly said good night). Not that he did anything , it was either feast or famine. Mostly famine. But as things started working properly (I'm sure a fluke) his suggestion was (should this happen again) remove the router from the surge protector, reboot the router and if the situation continues call back to (us) the ISP. So, as of now I'm not very confident that the problem has been solved?

      So to re-cap: if I remove the cable that goes to my desktop(from the router) and connect it to my laptop (no matter the length of cable) it works just fine. But if I reconnect the desktop as it was, then run a cable from another port to the laptop it's purely hit and miss.overthehill


                   

      truenorth



        Guru

        Thanked: 253
        Re: New to Networking
        « Reply #15 on: June 06, 2012, 07:14:31 AM »
        overthehill, Within your various posts you may have related to the following question but if so i cannot determine it. So! You run one cat 5 cable from the router to the laptop regardless of length the signal is good.Correct? Now when the problem arises is when the desktop is added is the same cable that was connected to the laptop still connected in exactly the same manner (same ports same length)? The 2nd cable needed to connect the desktop is connected to another output port on the router and to an Ethernet port on the desktop.Correct? When the laptop is alone it always works properly however when the desktop is added the signal strength is sometime good and sometimes not.Correct? What happens if the cable to the desktop is connected at the router end but NOT at the desktop end with the laptop still connected in terms of the performance of the laptop? What happens to the connection strength on the desktop if only it is connected? Is it always good or is it intermittent?truenorth

        overthehill

          Topic Starter


          Apprentice

        • Keep Canada beautiful. Swallow your beer cans.
        • Thanked: 14
          • Yes
          • Yes
        • Experience: Familiar
        • OS: Windows Vista
        Re: New to Networking
        « Reply #16 on: June 06, 2012, 09:37:29 AM »
        overthehill, Within your various posts you may have related to the following question but if so i cannot determine it. So! You run one cat 5 cable from the router to the laptop regardless of length the signal is good.Correct? Now when the problem arises is when the desktop is added is the same cable that was connected to the laptop still connected in exactly the same manner (same ports same length)? The 2nd cable needed to connect the desktop is connected to another output port on the router and to an Ethernet port on the desktop.Correct? When the laptop is alone it always works properly however when the desktop is added the signal strength is sometime good and sometimes not.Correct? What happens if the cable to the desktop is connected at the router end but NOT at the desktop end with the laptop still connected in terms of the performance of the laptop? What happens to the connection strength on the desktop if only it is connected? Is it always good or is it intermittent?truenorth

        Thanks trunorth, sorry for all the confusion. I'll attempt again to explain my current concern because I can now leave out all the other circumstances that I previously mentioned that were concerning me.Things such as the cables that I was using, testing inside vs outside and wireless speeds etc.

        What it now boils down to is this. Lack of consistency when wired to laptop.Desktop is always fine.

        1) When router is connected(the tech.connected to port #2) to the desktop I have no concerns.
        2) When an additional cable (either short or long) is connected(to either port #1,#3 or #4 and connected to the laptop that's when it's hit and miss.  <1.0 Mpbs download happens at times. Typically if I'm receiving slow speeds on the laptop when connected with a short cable I can be sure that the same will occur when I connect the 80 ft.cable. And vice-versa. Changing ports does not help when these slow speeds are occurring.

        This morning though all is working perfectly. Desktop connected to port#2.   Laptop connected to port # 3 with a 6ft. cable.
        I have my 80Ft. cable connected to port# 4 and when I take my laptop to the far end and connect, all is fine there now too.
        All readings >6.0 Mbps download.

        The question is; will it be tomorrow? Only time will tell. Thanks again,overthehill
                                                     


                     

        truenorth



          Guru

          Thanked: 253
          Re: New to Networking
          « Reply #17 on: June 06, 2012, 10:28:14 AM »
          Good. Using the tried and true proven technology assist we all have our fingers crossed that it stays that way.truenorth

          overthehill

            Topic Starter


            Apprentice

          • Keep Canada beautiful. Swallow your beer cans.
          • Thanked: 14
            • Yes
            • Yes
          • Experience: Familiar
          • OS: Windows Vista
          Re: New to Networking
          « Reply #18 on: June 06, 2012, 12:11:39 PM »
          Good. Using the tried and true proven technology assist we all have our fingers crossed that it stays that way.truenorth
           

          Your concern and good wishes are very much appreciated. Will keep you posted. Thanks, overthehill


                       

          overthehill

            Topic Starter


            Apprentice

          • Keep Canada beautiful. Swallow your beer cans.
          • Thanked: 14
            • Yes
            • Yes
          • Experience: Familiar
          • OS: Windows Vista
          Re: New to Networking
          « Reply #19 on: June 09, 2012, 11:16:09 PM »
           

          Your concern and good wishes are very much appreciated. Will keep you posted. Thanks, overthehill

          Well it wasn't long at all and I was back to the slow speeds on the laptop. As mentioned earlier it was the lack of consistent
          speed/s that I was dealing with.  And,as I had mentioned previously as well, I wasn't at all familiar with networking and never before had occasion to go wireless. Anyway, I finally found the cure and not sure if this is common or not but took a while to figure it out. If the laptop is connected, (wired) then shut down, when the laptop is restarted it shows that the wired connection is enabled and working properly. Problem at this point is bandwidth speed is now < 1.0 Mbps. The wired connection (in my case anyway) must then be disabled and then re-enabled. Once this is done I'm back to > 6.5 Mbps. When the connection showed that it was properly connected, I assumed that it was, but not the case.
          So, hoping somewhere, sometime, this info. may help someone else.
          Anyway, problem solved and a big Thanks to those that took the time to get involved. overthehill
           


                       

          Computer_Commando



            Hacker
          • Thanked: 494
          • Certifications: List
          • Computer: Specs
          • Experience: Expert
          • OS: Windows 10
          Re: New to Networking
          « Reply #20 on: June 10, 2012, 12:10:00 PM »
          Device Manger--Network Adapters; Double click yours
          Advanced Tab:  look at Properties & Values
          One of those needs to be changed; don't which one.

          overthehill

            Topic Starter


            Apprentice

          • Keep Canada beautiful. Swallow your beer cans.
          • Thanked: 14
            • Yes
            • Yes
          • Experience: Familiar
          • OS: Windows Vista
          Re: New to Networking
          « Reply #21 on: June 10, 2012, 03:38:27 PM »
          Device Manger--Network Adapters; Double click yours
          Advanced Tab:  look at Properties & Values
          One of those needs to be changed; don't which one.

          And again C-C thanks. Following your lead
          what I come up with is this, under
          Device Manager etc. and Advanced.
          Hoping that I understood you properly.

          Coalesce Buffers - 8
          Large Send   - Enabled
          Link Speed & Duplex -  Auto Detect
          Locally Administered Address - Not Present
          Receive Buffers - 48
          Transmit Control Blocks - 16 

          Are these the properties that you were referring to?  overthehill


                       

          Computer_Commando



            Hacker
          • Thanked: 494
          • Certifications: List
          • Computer: Specs
          • Experience: Expert
          • OS: Windows 10
          Re: New to Networking
          « Reply #22 on: June 10, 2012, 04:36:20 PM »
          And again C-C thanks. Following your lead
          what I come up with is this, under
          Device Manager etc. and Advanced.
          Hoping that I understood you properly.

          Coalesce Buffers - 8
          Large Send   - Enabled
          Link Speed & Duplex -  Auto Detect
          Locally Administered Address - Not Present
          Receive Buffers - 48
          Transmit Control Blocks - 16 

          Are these the properties that you were referring to?  overthehill
          Yes, those are the ones.
          It's a long shot, but maybe the one in bold.  Sometimes "autodetect" doesn't work.  You need to know if the router is 10BaseT or 100BaseT; same for the laptop.  Then just choose the appropriate one.  I have seen this situation before, but it's been a long time.  Could be the LAN driver, too.  Might need an update.
          BTW, you didn't say how you did this:  "The wired connection (in my case anyway) must then be disabled and then re-enabled."

          overthehill

            Topic Starter


            Apprentice

          • Keep Canada beautiful. Swallow your beer cans.
          • Thanked: 14
            • Yes
            • Yes
          • Experience: Familiar
          • OS: Windows Vista
          Re: New to Networking
          « Reply #23 on: June 10, 2012, 05:45:03 PM »
          Yes, those are the ones.
          It's a long shot, but maybe the one in bold.  Sometimes "autodetect" doesn't work.  You need to know if the router is 10BaseT or 100BaseT; same for the laptop.  Then just choose the appropriate one.  I have seen this situation before, but it's been a long time.  Could be the LAN driver, too.  Might need an update.
          BTW, you didn't say how you did this:  "The wired connection (in my case anyway) must then be disabled and then re-enabled."

          Thanks C-C. I'll certainly do my best to check out your suggestions. 10BaseT or 100BaseT, I'm not at all sure. As far as enabling or re-enabling , I simply did this through "Open Network Connections" from the "Task Bar". overthehill


                       

          truenorth



            Guru

            Thanked: 253
            Re: New to Networking
            « Reply #24 on: June 11, 2012, 07:03:17 AM »
            I just want to go back to the beginning of this post and address your reception problem again. I appreciate that you have made some purchasing decisions in order to overcome your distance limitations.However if you are still open to alternatives i want to show you what i have/did to overcome the same problem. I have web searched your modem/router.I feel you are restricting the portability benefits of your laptop by having it tethered to a cable.Here is the link to my replacement antennae that i am using instead of the one that came with my wireless router.
            http://realfa1000mwrouterresources.blogspot.ca/2012/02/airlink101-asb-10ma-omni-directional.html
            I suspect that all connections for antennae on various routers are the same.So examine yours to ensure that it has a screw on connector and then try to ascertain that the one i have linked will be compatible. I only went to the manufacturers site so i haven't done a price comparison but even there it is only $22.00. For your guidance,truenorth

            overthehill

              Topic Starter


              Apprentice

            • Keep Canada beautiful. Swallow your beer cans.
            • Thanked: 14
              • Yes
              • Yes
            • Experience: Familiar
            • OS: Windows Vista
            Re: New to Networking
            « Reply #25 on: June 11, 2012, 04:58:02 PM »
            I just want to go back to the beginning of this post and address your reception problem again. I appreciate that you have made some purchasing decisions in order to overcome your distance limitations.However if you are still open to alternatives i want to show you what i have/did to overcome the same problem. I have web searched your modem/router.I feel you are restricting the portability benefits of your laptop by having it tethered to a cable.Here is the link to my replacement antennae that i am using instead of the one that came with my wireless router.
            http://realfa1000mwrouterresources.blogspot.ca/2012/02/airlink101-asb-10ma-omni-directional.html
            I suspect that all connections for antennae on various routers are the same.So examine yours to ensure that it has a screw on connector and then try to ascertain that the one i have linked will be compatible. I only went to the manufacturers site so i haven't done a price comparison but even there it is only $22.00. For your guidance,truenorth

            Thanks once again, truenorth.
            I've checked out the link that you've provided and will certainly keep this option open. As it sits now, my laptop appears to be quite adequate(speed wise) without the hard wire as long as I'm not at the far end of my home. But as I've stated, I can overcome this simply by connecting the Ethernet cable, even if requires disabling and re-enabling the wired connection when at the far end. I've placed the router approx. 4ft. higher than is was (sitting on my desk) and (it seems) that I have seen some slight increased speed benefit and reliability. After more tests if I find that I'm not happy with the wireless speeds I'll certainly go for the option that you provided. And yes, the antennae that I currently have is a screw on. I haven't really yet checked every nook and cranny with the laptop (wireless)but so far appears satisfactory. But believe me, if I start getting hiccups when using my laptop (wireless) between my desk (front of my home) and anywhere in between that and the back ,I'll be checking compatibility(your lead) with my router and if things check out I'll be making the purchase.

            Appreciate this, overthehill


                         

            overthehill

              Topic Starter


              Apprentice

            • Keep Canada beautiful. Swallow your beer cans.
            • Thanked: 14
              • Yes
              • Yes
            • Experience: Familiar
            • OS: Windows Vista
            Re: New to Networking
            « Reply #26 on: June 12, 2012, 10:46:21 PM »
            I just want to go back to the beginning of this post and address your reception problem again. I appreciate that you have made some purchasing decisions in order to overcome your distance limitations.However if you are still open to alternatives i want to show you what i have/did to overcome the same problem. I have web searched your modem/router.I feel you are restricting the portability benefits of your laptop by having it tethered to a cable.Here is the link to my replacement antennae that i am using instead of the one that came with my wireless router.
            http://realfa1000mwrouterresources.blogspot.ca/2012/02/airlink101-asb-10ma-omni-directional.html
            I suspect that all connections for antennae on various routers are the same.So examine yours to ensure that it has a screw on connector and then try to ascertain that the one i have linked will be compatible. I only went to the manufacturers site so i haven't done a price comparison but even there it is only $22.00. For your guidance,truenorth

            Well truenorth, since my last response I've done speed tests (wireless) throughout my home and I'm quite pleased with the results. But, I can't leave it there. You've got me wondering what type of antennae or cable I would require to improve performance?. Not sure if the antennae that you suggested will work?
            _______________________________________ ____
            Here's what Actiontec suggests.

            Question -Can the antenna on the Actiontec Wireless device be upgraded?

            Answer - Yes, this device has an antenna that can be removed and replaced or upgraded. The connection method for this device, Reverse Polarity Sub-Miniture Adapter (RP-SMA), is readily available at most computer or electronics stores.
            _______________________________________ ____-

            So my question is; as near as I can figure the device (as just mentioned above) appears to be a cable which can be purchased in different lengths. Now does that cable connect to the router and then my current antennae, or ?? .

            I've attached a jpg. hoping that you can ascertain the type of antennae connection that I currently have.

            Thanks, overthehill


            [year+ old attachment deleted by admin]


                         

            truenorth



              Guru

              Thanked: 253
              Re: New to Networking
              « Reply #27 on: June 13, 2012, 07:01:14 AM »
              Well i think if i enlighten you on my own situation it may help you to decide which way to go.You have seen my replacement antennae and my experience as to the substantial improvement it has given.Now what you were not aware of is that the router to which it is attached IS an Airlink 101 router so compatibility was not an issue when i replace the original antennae with the one on it now. However my belief is that the screw type male/female connectors are universal. However if the brand of router you have offers an "upgrade" extended range antennae it probably is to address the same issue.In my case the replacement antennae has a cord of about 2 feet in length from the antennae with the screw on connector at the other end which screws on to the point at which the original antennae was attached. My recommendation would be to purchase whatever one you wish but do so from a retailer that will allow it's return for a full refund if your not satisfied with the result. I don't know your brand but Airlink is a very popular brand and should be readily available from a bricks and mortar retailer if that is the route you decide to go.   truenorth

              overthehill

                Topic Starter


                Apprentice

              • Keep Canada beautiful. Swallow your beer cans.
              • Thanked: 14
                • Yes
                • Yes
              • Experience: Familiar
              • OS: Windows Vista
              Re: New to Networking
              « Reply #28 on: June 13, 2012, 09:38:31 AM »
              Well i think if i enlighten you on my own situation it may help you to decide which way to go.You have seen my replacement antennae and my experience as to the substantial improvement it has given.Now what you were not aware of is that the router to which it is attached IS an Airlink 101 router so compatibility was not an issue when i replace the original antennae with the one on it now. However my belief is that the screw type male/female connectors are universal. However if the brand of router you have offers an "upgrade" extended range antennae it probably is to address the same issue.In my case the replacement antennae has a cord of about 2 feet in length from the antennae with the screw on connector at the other end which screws on to the point at which the original antennae was attached. My recommendation would be to purchase whatever one you wish but do so from a retailer that will allow it's return for a full refund if your not satisfied with the result. I don't know your brand but Airlink is a very popular brand and should be readily available from a bricks and mortar retailer if that is the route you decide to go.   truenorth

              Well it appears that I'll have to do some more checking around. An yes, certainly don't want to purchase something that doesn't work or that I can't return. Thanks, overthehill