Welcome guest. Before posting on our computer help forum, you must register. Click here it's easy and free.

Author Topic: Wireless stops working when I switch to battery  (Read 9038 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

patio

  • Moderator


  • Genius
  • Maud' Dib
  • Thanked: 1769
    • Yes
  • Experience: Beginner
  • OS: Windows 7
Re: Wireless stops working when I switch to battery
« Reply #15 on: July 15, 2007, 09:42:18 AM »
OK. I was just suspecting the battery as they do lose effectiveness over the years.

Is there any documentation for the Cisco wireless card in this issue or have you traveled to their site ? ?

The other place to look into since you have checked all the Windows based power options would be the power saving modes built into the laptop itself. These are normally  under a seperate listing in Control Panel and would be run by the Thinkpad software itself and or in the BIOS
Check your laptop documentation as well...
" Anyone who goes to a psychiatrist should have his head examined. "

mynameiskate

  • Guest
Re: Wireless stops working when I switch to battery
« Reply #16 on: July 16, 2007, 07:18:43 AM »
Thanks to everyone for your help.

Since my computer's from my university, I called up their tech support yesterday on the off chance that I was still covered (I graduated in May, so I assumed my tech support coverage had run out).  Turns out yesterday was the last day of coverage, what luck!

Anyway, the problem is apparently one that many ThinkPad R40s and T40s have, and it has to do with a driver needed for Think Vantage Access Connections, the default LAN management program.  I uninstalled that program about a year ago, because it was giving me serious trouble and making my computer run extremely slow. 

Basically, there is no way to fix the problem unless I reinstall Think Vantage Access Connections with the new driver, which I'm not too keen on.  IBM doesn't support any kind of fix if you're using windows to configure your wireless connection.  On the upshot, the guy said that the IBM program is now much better and doesn't slow down your computer as much, so I'm at least going to give it a shot.

Thanks again everybody--at least if this same thing comes up again, you'll all look like geniuses for knowing the answer :)