Doomsday:
I hear what you are saying! However, i'm not so sure i agree that using the legal services of braindumpscentral.com, testking.com, actualexams.com, correctexams.com, and the like are sites that forms of cheating. Let me explain.
The truth is, i've learned more by trying to understand the questions as much as seeing what others believe are the answers. I consider these resources a starting point,
not the source of all info. i need to pass the exams. I'd also have to say that the questions and answers provided by these resources cover no more than 50% of the questions i've found on the exams. Hence, they don't guarantee that one will pass, they only make it more likely.
I'd compare these resources to the time when i took those SAT practice exams (back in the day before CD players and Microsoft Windows)! If it were immoral (or even illegal) to prepare for an exam by taking previous versions of that exam, then why did my school system (and countless others) give the SAT practice tests to their students? Was it wrong for teachers to explain why certain answers to the questions were correct and why other answers were incorrect (even when some of the questions would appear on the actual exam their students would take)? Did any teachers go to prison or receive chastisment for having immoral conduct by preparing us for the exams?
The answer, i think you will agree, is no. I don't see how braindumpscentral.com and other resources are any different. But then, i had philosophy as a second major in college.
Regards,
Doc