BC_Programmer
Yes - similar, perhaps the same.
I knew nothing about these until very recently.
After much Googling, and almost as much forgetting, I have the impression that
"Reparse Points" is a generic term for various redirection objects;
"Hard Links" and "Folder Junctions" and "Symbolic Links" (Symlinks) are slightly different variants;
The Internet is a wonderful source of disinformation,
and "Hard Links" can sometimes be used as a name for Folder Junctions.
I think officially a "Hard Link" is like a crippled Folder junction.
They both do exactly the same if the repository target is on the same partition as this reparse point.
The Folder Junction (but not a Hard Link) is able to access repositories in other partitions.
Folder Junction appears to meet my needs, so I have not yet researched Symlinks, but somewhere I came across a suggestion that it is possible to access partitions on different physical drives.
I use the free version of xplorer2.
Some capabilities are restricted to the professional version,
but Folder Junctions are generously provided.
Useful references upon xplorer2 and Folder Junctions are available at
http://www.zabkat.com/blog/07Oct07.htmhttp://www.zabkat.com/blog/19Oct08-redirect-outlook-pst-folder.htmInternet disinformation :-
I read that a Folder Junction in an NTFS partition can target a FAT32 folder.
Actually it can, but I found that the created Folder junction target was NOT accessible through the Folder Junction. Total waste of time and effort.
I assume that Windows XP is looking at this "folder" within an NTFS partition,
and goes mental when it finds the "contents" are in FAT32.
I have multiple partitions, both NTFS and FAT32.
I now know that a NTFS to FAT32 bridge collapses.
I will carefully test any NTFS to NTFS bridge if the two partitions have different cluster sizes - if it can go wrong it will - especially if M.$. is involved ! !
Regards
Alan