Your system benchmark score (Using: CrystalMark2004)

[camerongray]

grr - Calum beat me 

I have upgraded the hard drive so I could probably improve with that.  I really need a new Graphics card.

[discboy321]

Does this support 64bit as well ? I checked the web site and it says it is a 32bit only

[Calum]

I ran it fine on XP X64, I believe others have run it under newer X64 OSes too.
Give it a try, it won't hurt

[bloop]

just tested my main computer i use for my projects.




its not over clocked yet and i know i can push it a lot more but just not worth the time right now...maybe when i get back into 3d rendering again i will.

[Computer Hope Admin]

Looks great bloob thanks for sharing. 

[Calum]

bloop, could you post the specs of your machine so we can see what the scores relate to?

[Calum]

Benchmarks from a new PC I built for my uncle.
Specs:
Intel Core i3 530
2x2GB patriot Sector G 1333MHz DDR3 RAM
Gigabyte H55M-UD2H motherboard
OCZ StealthXStream 600W PSU (yes...not great I know, but I was reusing it...)
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB HDD
Samsung  SH-S223C DVDRW
Xigmatek Asgard case

I spent a bit of time having fun with overclocking and testing this - did I mention hw much I LOVE i3?  I got it much higher, even on the stock cooler, but without raising the graphics voltage a fair way the integrated graphics weren't stable under full load.  3.6 is a nice conservative clock, actually done on lower than stock voltage so the temps are still very cool.

Non-overclocked:


Overclocked to 3.6GHz

[patio]

Nice OC ! !

[Calum]

It's not bad for lower than stock voltage, and the stock cooler
Ignoring the onboard graphics instability under load, I pushed to 3.8 with the same voltage - this is a very good chip, and I know for a fact it could go further.  If I'd used a separate graphics card, thus disabling the onboard graphics, it probably would have gone to 4.0 - with an aftermarket cooler, even a very cheap one as the i3's put out very little heat, I could have gone further, as I could with better RAM.
But, then I sat down and remembered the aim of this build was a cheap internet machine...
For reference, maximum temperatures after a full 12 hours of Linpack were 65C - this is way above any other load anyone can put on a processor, and while running CrystalMark's CPU benches it didn't break 50C.  I love i3.

[Computer Hope Admin]

Very nice. Like the comparison pics. Gives a good comparison between them.

[Calum]

Thanks.
The results are somewhat strange, though - see how the graphics benchmark scores have increased, although the graphics core speed has remained the same?  Shows that CrystalMark's graphics tests are rather CPU dependent.
Also, the memory score has gone up ore than I'd expect, for saying at stock clocks the memory is at 1333MHz and at the overclocked speed it's at something like 1396MHz, somehow this has given nearly a 4000 point increase.  I can only assume the memory part of the benchark is also rather CPU dependent.
Just goes to show the relationship between the components I guess.

[BluerjB]

Idk what to say..

Oppps Double attach

[recovering disk space - old attachment deleted by admin]

[Computer Hope Admin]

Idk what to say..

Oppps Double attach

Nice stats, look good. I helped you out and deleted one of your posts. Thanks again for sharing.

[BluerjB]

Nice stats, look good. I helped you out and deleted one of your posts. Thanks again for sharing.

Thanks

[harry 48]

this win7  is hard to learn , i'm having to write these results down until i get screen capture up and running


MARK  140666

ALU     49303

FPU     48390

MEM    19026

HDD    12579

GDI     6908

D2D    1913

OGL    2547