Author Topic: Windows board broke up to other boards. (Read 29297 times)

Computer Hope Admin · « **on:** June 01, 2009, 07:46:30 PM »

It's been brought up and suggested that the Windows board be broke up into child boards like the how the current FAQ section is currently setup. As always I'd like to bring this to the Computer Hope community before doing something this big. So feel free to vote if you would or would not like this change. For those of you who don't care either way there will no be no vote for that to prevent confusion, but feel free to comment.

Here is what is what is currently being voted on for child boards.

+ Windows Vista and 7
+ Windows XP
+ Windows Server 2003 and 2008
+ Windows 2000, ME, NT, 98, 95, and Windows 3.x

So in other words each of the above options would be a board of their own.

Feel free to make any additional suggestions and/or comments about this change.

computeruler · « **Reply #1 on:** June 01, 2009, 07:51:06 PM »

I saw to keep it how it is and just add windows 7 to the description. 1/2 the people will post in the wrong place anyways

Carbon Dudeoxide · « **Reply #2 on:** June 01, 2009, 08:40:07 PM »

Child boards? I really don't see how that's going to work. As Computeruler said (and has been said in the bar), it will just cause more trouble in terms of posting in the wrong section.

I'm just up for adding the description.

JJ 3000 · « **Reply #3 on:** June 01, 2009, 10:20:02 PM »

I think we should hold up on adding 7 to the description until it is officially realeased.
I think the current setup is working well; no need to change it.

quaxo · « **Reply #4 on:** June 02, 2009, 02:55:38 AM »

Quote from: computeruler on June 01, 2009, 07:51:06 PM

I saw to keep it how it is and just add windows 7 to the description. 1/2 the people will post in the wrong place anyways

Totally agree with Computeruler on this.

Calum · « **Reply #5 on:** June 02, 2009, 06:09:13 AM »

I vote to break it down into sub boards, but I don't think NT/2000 belong with 9x.
Maybe the boards should be "NT, 2000 and XP", and "95, 98 and ME".
Just my 2 pence

Cityscape · « **Reply #6 on:** June 02, 2009, 09:07:09 AM »

Quote from: Calum on June 02, 2009, 06:09:13 AM

I vote to break it down into sub boards, but I don't think NT/2000 belong with 9x.
Maybe the boards should be "NT, 2000 and XP", and "95, 98 and ME".
Just my 2 pence

I agree.

If it was to have sub boards (i still can't decide) i'd want it like this:
+Windows 3.1, 95, 98 & ME
+Windows NT, 2000, XP
+Windows Server 2000, 2003 & 2008 (maybe we shouldn"t have a separate one for server)
+Windows Vista & Seven

Or merge the servers into the others. Not many use servers.
+Windows 3.1, 95, 98 & ME
+Windows NT, 2000, XP & Server 2003
+Windows Vista, Seven & Server 2008

BC_Programmer · « **Reply #7 on:** June 02, 2009, 10:03:50 AM »

Windows 3.1 shouldn't get a board- It's handled in the DOS forum, since MS-DOS is always running underneath.

Calum · « **Reply #8 on:** June 02, 2009, 10:53:43 AM »

I agree with Cityscape's board recommendations, with the exception that I think if the boards are to be broken down, servers should be kept separate, as the OSes can be different in certain important ways (also they're used very differently).

michaewlewis · « **Reply #9 on:** June 02, 2009, 12:02:32 PM »

How about if we just split it into Windows Desktops and Windows Servers?

computeruler · « **Reply #10 on:** June 02, 2009, 04:30:03 PM »

I really just don't think that its necessary. I think that the new operating systems should be added to the description. remember the saying: if it works then dont change it or something like that

Ironman · « **Reply #11 on:** June 02, 2009, 05:06:38 PM »

I have to agree with Computer Ruler, no need to separate the Windows Board into separate boards, most people only use XP and Vista anyway.

Broni · « **Reply #12 on:** June 02, 2009, 05:22:04 PM »

I would go:
- Windows 7
- Windows Vista
- Windows XP
- other Windows versions
I assume, combined number of people using 3.1, 95, 98, 2000, and servers must be below 5%

I disagree on:

Quote

1/2 the people will post in the wrong place anyways

.
Judging from other boards, I belong to, and which have Windows sub-forums, it doesn't happen that often.
Also, keep in mind, that since we introduced Windows version in user profile, 90% of our members have that displayed under their avatars.

quaxo · « **Reply #13 on:** June 02, 2009, 08:24:09 PM »

One important thing to remember: A lot of people come here for computer help because they don't know much about computers. If we start breaking up the Windows boards, it's going to lead to confusion. More than a few times I've asked people what version of Windows they have and they couldn't tell me.

Keep all Windows version together avoids the confusion of knowing where to post.

patio · « **Reply #14 on:** June 02, 2009, 08:40:01 PM »

Quote from: quaxo on June 02, 2009, 08:24:09 PM

One important thing to remember: A lot of people come here for computer help because they don't know much about computers. If we start breaking up the Windows boards, it's going to lead to confusion. More than a few times I've asked people what version of Windows they have and they couldn't tell me.

Keep all Windows version together avoids the confusion of knowing where to post.

Agreed.

Broni · « **Reply #15 on:** June 02, 2009, 08:50:36 PM »

As I said before, at least 90% of all members (maybe more) have that info displayed, so I don't think there are too many computer dummies.
I won't cry, though, if the setting stays as it's now. I don't think, it's anything crucial.

michaewlewis · « **Reply #16 on:** June 03, 2009, 03:21:56 PM »

Personally, I am more likely to help out or join in on conversations about servers than desktops. Mostly because I get tired of the same old issues brought up by newbies (not intended to insult anyone), and because there are plenty of members that like to handle them. This is also the reason I don't ever enter the windows sub board, too much to sort through to find anything interesting. A separate server sub board would make this forum more useful for it admins that won't want to worry about their server questions being missed because of newbie questions overloading the board.

fat_basterd21 · « **Reply #17 on:** June 05, 2009, 03:44:00 PM »

If I was going to do this it would be just the basic.

1. Windows 7
2. Windows Vista
3 Windows XP - 3.1

90% Of people without Windows 7/ Vista will have XP why make 5 other places for 3 posts a year.

Also am turning in my vote to leave it as it is. It doesn't seem its that important and even if it was changed you would have to ask the question "What version" just to make sure they were in the right place.

kpac · « **Reply #18 on:** June 06, 2009, 04:52:02 AM »

Quote from: fat_basterd21 on June 05, 2009, 03:44:00 PM

If I was going to do this it would be just the basic.

1. Windows 7
2. Windows Vista
3 Windows XP - 3.1

Why would you have a seperate board for Windows 7 when hardly any people use it yet?

harry 48 · « **Reply #19 on:** June 07, 2009, 01:36:01 PM »

why try to break something that works

patio · « **Reply #20 on:** June 07, 2009, 05:45:14 PM »

Agreed.

evilfantasy · « **Reply #21 on:** June 07, 2009, 06:04:41 PM »

A) A lot of people agreeing with Computer Ruler speaks volumes...

B) A lot of people are confused when they come here yes but as Broni said it works well at other forums. Although confused and maybe not knowing much about the inner workings of a computer, they do know very well what OS they have.

In the end I think it will work either way.

patio · « **Reply #22 on:** June 07, 2009, 06:32:29 PM »

I just tried to vote 3 more times and it didn't work...
It always did in Chicago...

Computer Hope Admin · « **Reply #23 on:** June 10, 2009, 12:55:40 PM »

Quote from: patio on June 07, 2009, 06:32:29 PM

I just tried to vote 3 more times and it didn't work...
It always did in Chicago...

lol

..

Just letting everyone know this is still staying open for debate, will probably make some type of decision at the end of this month.

sher · « **Reply #24 on:** June 19, 2009, 05:13:12 PM »

I think Calum has a good suggestion, but you know how people are...Quaxo said it best: "1/2 the people will post in the wrong place..."

People are already stressed when they come for help, so it may be unproductive to break it up into sections.

If you think it will help you give better service, then do it!

How bout a 30 day trial run. I bet that will tell you what you need to know.

Computer Hope Admin · « **Reply #25 on:** June 20, 2009, 04:26:24 AM »

I think I've given this enough time for everyone to vote. I'll likely be changing updating this weekend (assuming not too busy fathers day). Otherwise will be happening at the first of next week.

+ Windows Vista and 7
+ Windows XP
+ Windows Server 2003 and 2008
+ Windows 2000, ME, NT, 98, 95, and 3.x

I'm not exactly sure how easy this is going to be but I think the easiest solution at this time would be to keep all current posts in the Windows board while this is being tried out and then moving all posts potentially in the future if it goes off well. If everything goes berserk then it'd also be easy to migrate everything back.

Carbon Dudeoxide · « **Reply #26 on:** June 20, 2009, 08:36:53 AM »

From a moderator's point of view, I don't like the idea of changing it.

However, I am willing to try it for a few weeks; see how it goes.

quaxo · « **Reply #27 on:** June 20, 2009, 11:06:15 AM »

While I don't agree with separating them in the first place, I definitely don't agree with the NT family being spread over all four boards. A lot of the components are the same and they will have similar issues (and solutions). I'm just not really keen on this proposed new layout at all. I prefer the simplicity of the current layout. Is there some specific reason for this change? I mean, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.

I understand Carbon. From a moderator's point of view (which I'm not here, but have been elsewhere), I can see how it could be a bit annoying.

From a helper's point of view, it's much easier having all of the Windows issues in one place, as I am familiar with all versions and help with them all.

If they really must be broken up, I think it should be done by family:

+NT family
+Server family (though they are NT family, different purpose)
+9x family (including ME)
--->Windows 3.1 should be merged with the MS-DOS forum for reasons I hope are obvious

This just seems a lot more logical to me than the proposed layout.

schieckia · « **Reply #28 on:** June 20, 2009, 10:32:53 PM »

windows XP

Broni · « **Reply #29 on:** June 20, 2009, 10:37:04 PM »

JJ 3000 · « **Reply #30 on:** June 21, 2009, 12:05:06 AM »

While you're at it, why don't you break up the Linux board into different distros?

But seriously... don't change the windows board.

iamtonsoffun247 · « **Reply #31 on:** June 21, 2009, 10:37:43 PM »

I think it should be split up. It'll help keep same issues for same OS's on same board. For example, if somebody wants to see if somebody had an issue with a certain OS, they can search the board that is specific for the OS they need help with. Also, it will be better for people who help as well. Possibly somebody knows more about 2000 than Vista and it would be easier for that person to help with issues with 2000 if they are all in the same place, instead of having to skim over and find out which OS needs help, especially since nobody ever puts the name of the OS in the subject.(You could always do that...make it essential that the OS is included in the subject, where they cannot post until they tick which is their OS).

Carbon Dudeoxide · « **Reply #32 on:** June 21, 2009, 10:42:49 PM »

Ever heard of the Search feature?
http://www.computerhope.com/forum/index.php?action=search

Ptfitzy · « **Reply #33 on:** June 22, 2009, 10:18:49 AM »

Since you all at "Computer Hope" are offering your time to help us all, I say it be set up the way it is the best and easiest for you.
ptfitzy

BC_Programmer · « **Reply #34 on:** June 22, 2009, 12:32:04 PM »

alright. It's split up now...

Quote

Windows 3.x 95, 98, ME, NT, and 2000

but, the first four are completely different from NT and 2000...

Computer Hope Admin · « **Reply #35 on:** June 22, 2009, 12:51:36 PM »

Quote from: BC_Programmer on June 22, 2009, 12:32:04 PM

alright. It's split up now...
but, the first four are completely different from NT and 2000...

Still something that I was in the process of working on. But agree I'll break these two versions of Windows into there own categories.

However, as mentioned and seen this has taken place, lets give it some time and see how it works out. As can also be seen I've un-stickied and/or moved the sticky items that were at the top of the Windows folder as well.

kpac · « **Reply #36 on:** June 22, 2009, 02:51:06 PM »

Don't forget, in the "Please read this first" threads, to update the "Click here to post in the ....." line to suit the board it's located in.

Computer Hope Admin · « **Reply #37 on:** June 22, 2009, 03:01:02 PM »

Quote from: kpac on June 22, 2009, 02:51:06 PM

Don't forget, in the "Please read this first" threads, to update the "Click here to post in the ....." line to suit the board it's located in.

Thanks. Done. I've also customized the links to be for the version of Windows they relate to and have also added the same link at the end of the post.

harry 48 · « **Reply #38 on:** June 22, 2009, 03:44:59 PM »

looked at it tonight and it looks good and should work better , but i'm no expert

quaxo · « **Reply #39 on:** June 22, 2009, 05:32:16 PM »

To be completely honest, I really really don't like this.

1. The "Windows" board is still there, which means people are still going to be able to post there instead of posting where they should.

2. We now have to look in 5 boards (6 if you count the parent board) to give help with Windows issues.

Computer Hope Admin · « **Reply #40 on:** June 22, 2009, 05:50:15 PM »

Quote from: quaxo on June 22, 2009, 05:32:16 PM

To be completely honest, I really really don't like this.

1. The "Windows" board is still there, which means people are still going to be able to post there instead of posting where they should.

2. We now have to look in 5 boards (6 if you count the parent board) to give help with Windows issues.

Appreciate the feedback as always.

1. Not saying this wont happen, but so far with the few posts that have been made since this has been done this hasn't really happened much and I believe this happened because the readme first posts were linking to create a post in the Windows directory and not the appropriate child board.

2. Really I doubt you'll be looking in more than two folders, since I'd guesstimate that 90-95% of the questions are either Vista or XP.

Lets give it some time at the very minimum a week. If it doesn't seem to be working, it'll be easily converted back. One of the big reasons I'm in favor of this is because of the valid complaint that some questions such as those in less popular versions of Windows have their posts lost because of the popularity of XP and Vista.

quaxo · « **Reply #41 on:** June 22, 2009, 05:59:01 PM »

Quote from: Computer Hope Admin on June 22, 2009, 05:50:15 PM

Lets give it some time at the very minimum a week.

Ok, but only a week. If I don't like it you'll be hearing from me! I'm a letter writer, ya know!

Computer Hope Admin · « **Reply #42 on:** June 22, 2009, 06:23:25 PM »

Quote from: quaxo on June 22, 2009, 05:59:01 PM

Ok, but only a week. If I don't like it you'll be hearing from me! I'm a letter writer, ya know!

That's all good I welcome it.

iamtonsoffun247 · « **Reply #43 on:** June 22, 2009, 08:53:01 PM »

Quote from: Carbon Dudeoxide on June 21, 2009, 10:42:49 PM

Ever heard of the Search feature?
http://www.computerhope.com/forum/index.php?action=search

The funny thing is, what if the person doesnt mention what OS they are talking about right away (which happens often)

kpac · « **Reply #44 on:** June 23, 2009, 01:30:16 PM »

What I would do here is just change the new subforums to actual forums of the Microsoft category. That way, all the boards would show up on the forum index.

Computer Hope Admin · « **Reply #45 on:** June 23, 2009, 04:48:30 PM »

Update:

I've now made it so posts in the Windows board (not each of the Windows child boards) can only be replied to. No new posts can be created, which should help solve issues with users doing that.

Quote from: iamtonsoffun247 on June 22, 2009, 08:53:01 PM

The funny thing is, what if the person doesnt mention what OS they are talking about right away (which happens often)

Most users will now fill out what OS they're using in their profile so that can be relied upon if needed.

Quote from: kpac on June 23, 2009, 01:30:16 PM

What I would do here is just change the new subforums to actual forums of the Microsoft category. That way, all the boards would show up on the forum index.

Personally I wouldn't like that since it'd add four additional boards to the main page, which would take up a lot of space, still trying to keep things easy as possible and I think that would complicate things and be annoying to scroll through. But if needed we can put it to a vote to see what the overall community thinks.

Cityscape · « **Reply #46 on:** June 25, 2009, 06:36:02 PM »

I really like the new format.

But i still think Windows NT & 2000 could go with XP as they are all similar Windows NT line systems. But it's also fine the way it is...

My prob before was when I asked a question about Windows 3.1 it get lost among the XP-Vista stuff. Now that'd never happen. I like the new layout a lot.

Please don't change it back

Dusty · « **Reply #47 on:** June 26, 2009, 02:12:15 AM »

Only criticism is that the Last Post column doesn't show which child board it's in.

michaewlewis · « **Reply #48 on:** July 21, 2009, 01:00:23 PM »

I have a suggestion for the server board. It should be titled "Windows Servers" instead of "Windows Server 2003 and 2008" or add Server 2000 to the mix too. But wasn't there an NT Server too?
Reason for the suggestion is here: http://www.computerhope.com/forum/index.php/topic,88040.msg590166.html (See title)

Computer Hope Admin · « **Reply #49 on:** July 21, 2009, 04:47:26 PM »

Quote

But i still think Windows NT & 2000 could go with XP as they are all similar Windows NT line systems. But it's also fine the way it is...

Because many users are no longer using NT or 2000 I still think it's best these two remain seperate to help posts made about these versions of OS's not get lost in the XP section.

Quote

Only criticism is that the Last Post column doesn't show which child board it's in.

I agree this does make things difficult. I'll see if I can find some type of fix or solution for it.

Quote

I have a suggestion for the server board. It should be titled "Windows Servers" instead of "Windows Server 2003 and 2008" or add Server 2000 to the mix too. But wasn't there an NT Server too?

Agreed, changed.

Cityscape · « **Reply #50 on:** July 21, 2009, 04:55:37 PM »

Quote from: michaewlewis on July 21, 2009, 01:00:23 PM

I have a suggestion for the server board. It should be titled "Windows Servers" instead of "Windows Server 2003 and 2008" or add Server 2000 to the mix too. But wasn't there an NT Server too?
Reason for the suggestion is here: http://www.computerhope.com/forum/index.php/topic,88040.msg590166.html (See title)

I agree with michaewlewis, all the Windows Servers should be under one section.

Versions of Windows servers were:
- Windows NT 3.1 Advanced Server (1993)
- Windows NT 3.5 Server (1994)
- Windows NT 3.5 Server (1995)
- Windows NT 4.0 Server (1996)
- Windows NT 4.0 Server Enterprise Edition (1997)
- Windows NT 4.0 Terminal Server (1998)
- Windows 2000 Server, Advanced Server and Datacenter Server
- Windows Server 2003 (Sandard, Enterprise and Datacenter editions)
- Windows Server 2008

Computer Hope Admin · « **Reply #51 on:** July 23, 2009, 04:24:03 PM »

Cityscape, The description should match what you mentioned above, just thought I'd throw that out there. If you think it needs more let me know. However, still debating about keeping the 2k / NT section since there are Workstation versions of these OS's. Although based off about the last month not many posts in this section so it's possible it could be migrated into one.

What's everyone think about this?

Overall it seems that this change has become generally accepted. If you still don't enjoy something about this change that I haven't already addressed please speak up. I'd imagine in a few more weeks I'll also be demoting this thread so it's no longer a sticky.

evilfantasy · « **Reply #52 on:** July 23, 2009, 04:27:18 PM »

Less is more...

I think it is good the way you have it now. Maybe take the Workstation out of the Windows NT / 2000. I've only seen them described that way a few times. Actually Windows 2000 could be put in with XP since they are almost the same.

Computer Hope Admin · « **Reply #53 on:** July 23, 2009, 04:34:05 PM »

Couldn't agree with you more that less is more. I try my hardest to live by the KISS principle.

Any hesitations / complaints about this suggested change?

I'd move 2000 to XP so that category would be Windows 2000 and XP. However, would keep 2000 also in Server for those users and then move NT to Windows 3.x, 95, 98, and ME section. So we'd eliminate one of the categories and end up with.

Windows 2000 and XP
Windows Vista and 7
Windows Server
Windows 3.x, 95, 98, NT, and ME

patio · « **Reply #54 on:** July 23, 2009, 05:07:43 PM »

It would be nice if the Fatherboard could reflect new Posts...rather than it only reflecting Windows posts...

BC_Programmer · « **Reply #55 on:** July 24, 2009, 09:50:48 AM »

I don't think NT should be with 3.1,95, and 98, simply because of their vast architecture differences.

In fact, Windows 3.1 is really more a DOS program then a OS...

michaewlewis · « **Reply #56 on:** July 24, 2009, 10:17:47 AM »

Quote from: patio on July 23, 2009, 05:07:43 PM

It would be nice if the Fatherboard could reflect new Posts...rather than it only reflecting Windows posts...

Don't you mean, the Motherboard?

Cityscape · « **Reply #57 on:** July 24, 2009, 02:56:52 PM »

Quote from: Computer Hope Admin on July 23, 2009, 04:34:05 PM

Any hesitations / complaints about this suggested change?
Windows 2000 and XP
Windows Vista and 7
Windows Server
Windows 3.x, 95, 98, NT, and ME

I've said this before and I'll say it again: NT should not be with 95/98/ME.
NT is way too different. NT is way more like Vista then is it 95/98/ME.

I'd say leave it the way it is or add NT/2000 with XP.

michaewlewis · « **Reply #58 on:** July 24, 2009, 03:13:11 PM »

the main thing that is different is that it is built on NT technology and not DOS. Most of the rest of the OS is similar. Most people wouldn't know the difference anyhow.
Also, doesn't NT use a lot of the same drivers as 98?

patio · « **Reply #59 on:** July 24, 2009, 05:36:26 PM »

Quote from: michaewlewis on July 24, 2009, 10:17:47 AM

Don't you mean, the Motherboard?

I as usual have no idea what i mean...

BC_Programmer · « **Reply #60 on:** July 25, 2009, 08:55:21 AM »

Quote from: michaewlewis on July 24, 2009, 03:13:11 PM

Also, doesn't NT use a lot of the same drivers as 98?

Not even close. In fact most programs had to be specially designed to work on both NT and Windows 95/98.

Cityscape · « **Reply #61 on:** July 25, 2009, 10:12:38 AM »

Quote from: michaewlewis on July 24, 2009, 03:13:11 PM

the main thing that is different is that it is built on NT technology and not DOS. Most of the rest of the OS is similar. Most people wouldn't know the difference anyhow.
Also, doesn't NT use a lot of the same drivers as 98?

No, NT has major differences all over it, it is nothing like the 95/98 OS.
And it's drivers are very different too.

NT can not go with 95/98/ME, it's just way too different.
It fit better with XP then 95 & 98.

Computer Hope Admin · « **Reply #62 on:** July 27, 2009, 06:17:38 PM »

Quote

It would be nice if the Fatherboard could reflect new Posts...rather than it only reflecting Windows posts...

I've tried to search find some type of solution for this but unfortunately haven't find a good solution yet. If anyone knows of some ideas feel free to let me know. I'm guessing I'll have to hack out my own solution for that, which will take me some time. :/ This has been added added to the forum TO-DO thread.

--

As far as moving the 2k / NT section, I'm really up in a limbo on this one I see both sides of the argument. NT is really it's own beast especially if you take NT 3.x vs NT 4.x. I could see NT 3.x being more like 9x and NT 4.x being more like XP. I'm thinking with these type of conflicts / confusion that maybe right now instead of migrating the channels that it'd be best that they be left how they are. This should probably also continue to help those users running these versions of Windows from loosing their posts in the XP section.

I've gone with the initial recommendation of Evilfantasy and removed "workstation" from the board title and description of the NT 2000 board.

kpac · « **Reply #63 on:** July 28, 2009, 02:54:11 AM »

Quote

It would be nice if the Fatherboard could reflect new Posts...rather than it only reflecting Windows posts...

Can you explain this a bit more.......Not sure I understand it completely.

patio · « **Reply #64 on:** July 28, 2009, 05:51:41 AM »

If there is a new Post in let's say the Vista section...the main Windows board does not reflect it...

kpac · « **Reply #65 on:** July 28, 2009, 05:58:03 AM »

Quote

.the main Windows board does not reflect it...

With the New Posts icon?

Or the post/topic count?

patio · « **Reply #66 on:** July 28, 2009, 06:00:46 AM »

new posts....

kpac · « **Reply #67 on:** July 28, 2009, 06:02:37 AM »

I'll have a look and see if I can do anything.

JJ 3000 · « **Reply #68 on:** August 19, 2009, 01:38:35 AM »

I still don't like it.
Change it back.

Cityscape · « **Reply #69 on:** August 19, 2009, 09:49:23 AM »

I'm in favor of leaving it the way it is.

It's perfect right now.

michaewlewis · « **Reply #70 on:** August 19, 2009, 11:02:52 AM »

Quote from: Cityscape on August 19, 2009, 09:49:23 AM

I'm in favor of leaving it the way it is.

It's perfect right now.

Totally agree.

patio · « **Reply #71 on:** August 19, 2009, 12:50:34 PM »

Perfect can't be achieved...except putting a man on the Moon.

evilfantasy · « **Reply #72 on:** August 19, 2009, 12:52:20 PM »

Quote from: patio on August 19, 2009, 12:50:34 PM

Perfect can't be achieved...except putting a man on the Moon.

Conspiracy theorists worldwide just cringed.

patio · « **Reply #73 on:** August 19, 2009, 04:49:55 PM »

Yer killin me EF.....

Computer Hope Admin · « **Reply #74 on:** August 19, 2009, 05:44:55 PM »

Quote from: JJ 3000 on August 19, 2009, 01:38:35 AM

I still don't like it.
Change it back.

Do you have any suggestions on improvement or something that would allow it to remain the same but help resolve what you don't like about it? I only ask since the votes and community seem to be in favor of the change.

hot dog · « **Reply #75 on:** August 19, 2009, 06:47:43 PM »

Quote from: quaxo on June 02, 2009, 08:24:09 PM

One important thing to remember: A lot of people come here for computer help because they don't know much about computers. If we start breaking up the Windows boards, it's going to lead to confusion. More than a few times I've asked people what version of Windows they have and they couldn't tell me.

Keep all Windows version together avoids the confusion of knowing where to post.

I think this is a good point....

It will help prevent clutter and posting in wrong forums...

Cityscape · « **Reply #76 on:** August 19, 2009, 07:27:02 PM »

Quote from: blockHEAD on August 19, 2009, 06:47:43 PM

I think this is a good point....

It will help prevent clutter and posting in wrong forums...

So far there has no or few problems with this. So that should not affect any decision.

Quote from: smeezekitty on August 19, 2009, 06:51:39 PM

do you know how old this topic is?

Yes, we are experienced users and know what we are doing.

Computer Hope Admin · « **Reply #77 on:** September 15, 2009, 02:19:45 AM »

As far as I can tell this seems to be for the most part an accepted solution for the Windows boards. Comments and further suggestions are always still welcome however removing this posts sticky status.

Computer Hope Forum

News:

Poll

Change the Windows board?

Author Topic: Windows board broke up to other boards. (Read 29297 times)

Computer Hope Admin

computeruler

Carbon Dudeoxide

JJ 3000

quaxo

Calum

Cityscape

BC_Programmer

Calum

michaewlewis

computeruler

Ironman

Broni

quaxo

patio

Broni

michaewlewis

fat_basterd21

kpac

harry 48

patio

evilfantasy

patio

Computer Hope Admin

sher

Computer Hope Admin

Carbon Dudeoxide

quaxo

schieckia

Broni

JJ 3000

iamtonsoffun247

Carbon Dudeoxide

Ptfitzy

BC_Programmer

Computer Hope Admin

kpac

Computer Hope Admin

harry 48

quaxo

Computer Hope Admin

quaxo

Computer Hope Admin

iamtonsoffun247

kpac

Computer Hope Admin

Cityscape

Dusty

michaewlewis

Computer Hope Admin

Cityscape

Computer Hope Admin

evilfantasy

Computer Hope Admin

patio

BC_Programmer

michaewlewis

Cityscape

michaewlewis

patio

BC_Programmer

Cityscape

Computer Hope Admin

kpac

patio

kpac

patio

kpac

JJ 3000

Cityscape

michaewlewis

patio

evilfantasy