Welcome guest. Before posting on our computer help forum, you must register. Click here it's easy and free.

Author Topic: MS DOS 6.2 Question  (Read 11401 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Quantos



    Guru
  • Veni, Vidi, Vici
  • Thanked: 170
    • Yes
    • Yes
  • Computer: Specs
  • Experience: Guru
  • OS: Linux variant
Re: MS DOS 6.2 Question
« Reply #15 on: June 26, 2009, 06:28:45 PM »
Quote
Win 98SE is DOS 6.2....not DOS 7.1

Thanks patio.  I wasn't sure if I remembered that correctly.
Evil is an exact science.

Woodman



    Beginner
    Re: MS DOS 6.2 Question
    « Reply #16 on: June 26, 2009, 08:09:39 PM »
    Win 98SE is DOS 6.2....not DOS 7.1.

    I'd like to query that.  I have a hazy recollection of what was named Dos 7.1  being distributed on-line having been extracted from Windows 98se by Wengier Wu and his team at the China Dos Union.  It's still available for download but from a different source.

    The following quote is from this site and clearly mentions Win 95 and Win 98 and Dos 7.0

    Quote
    There is almost no difference in the relationship between Windows 95/98 and it's hidden DOS 7.0 and Windows 3 and DOS 6

    So, is the underlying Dos version in Win 98se version 6.2 or 7.0 or were versions of 98se available with both Dos versions.  Would MS have used Dos 6.2 in Win 98se when Dos 7.0 was already in use with Win 95?

    « Last Edit: June 26, 2009, 08:23:31 PM by Woodman »

    BC_Programmer


      Mastermind
    • Typing is no substitute for thinking.
    • Thanked: 1140
      • Yes
      • Yes
      • BC-Programming.com
    • Certifications: List
    • Computer: Specs
    • Experience: Beginner
    • OS: Windows 11
    Re: MS DOS 6.2 Question
    « Reply #17 on: June 26, 2009, 09:22:21 PM »
    DOS 6.0 and 6.2 & 6.22 exist standalone. But they cannot possibly be the same version as that included in windows 95/98 because MSDOS.SYS is a binary system file changed to a text configuration file. It  stands to reason that not only is this a major change requiring a change in version number but also that windows 95 was released over a year after DOS 6.22 which leads us to conclude that windows 95 comes with DOS 7.0, Windows 98 with 7.1 and windows ME with 7.2.
    I was trying to dereference Null Pointers before it was cool.

    Cityscape

      Topic Starter


      Adviser

    • Running Debian 8, Linux Mint and Windows 10.
    • Thanked: 15
      • Yes
    • Certifications: List
    • Computer: Specs
    • Experience: Experienced
    • OS: Linux variant
    Re: MS DOS 6.2 Question
    « Reply #18 on: June 26, 2009, 10:51:42 PM »
    Perhaps you could purchase a legal copy from someone on eBay.
    Some people on eBay post a picture of a product and just send you a copy.
    And any copy of DOS is legal as long as you own a Windows OS.
    Here's an easier solution.  Install Windows 98SE.  Then install TweakUI, it can be found on the 98SE disk, or you can search Microsofts site for it.

    This utility installs in your Control Panel. After installing it you go to the Control Panel and click on the TweakUI icon. Then click on the Boot tab and change the boot settings any way you want.

    Set it to boot without the GUI, reboot and install Windows 3.1.


    You owe me :) :)
    But i'd still have the 98SE installed right? Cause i'd prefer no 98SE.

    Woodman



      Beginner
      Re: MS DOS 6.2 Question
      « Reply #19 on: June 26, 2009, 11:12:12 PM »
      which leads us to conclude that windows 95 comes with DOS 7.0, Windows 98 with 7.1 and windows ME with 7.2.

      Thank you BC - I can buy into that.

      Edit:  Now find that Windows ME has Dos version 8.  Quote from Wiki
      Quote
      Windows XP contains a copy of the core MS-DOS 8 files from Windows Millennium, accessible only by formatting a floppy as an "MS-DOS startup disk". Attempting to run COMMAND.COM from such a disk under the NTVDM results in the message "Incorrect MS-DOS version".[citation needed] (Note that the DOS boot disk created by Windows XP is even more stripped-down than that created in Windows 98, as it does not include CD-ROM support.)

      With Windows Vista the files on the startup disk are dated 18th April 2005 but are otherwise unchanged, including the string "MS-DOS Version 8 (C) Copyright 1981-1999 Microsoft Corp" inside COMMAND.COM.
      « Last Edit: June 27, 2009, 03:11:49 AM by Woodman »

      Quantos



        Guru
      • Veni, Vidi, Vici
      • Thanked: 170
        • Yes
        • Yes
      • Computer: Specs
      • Experience: Guru
      • OS: Linux variant
      Re: MS DOS 6.2 Question
      « Reply #20 on: June 27, 2009, 01:07:08 AM »
      Quote
      But i'd still have the 98SE installed right? Cause i'd prefer no 98SE.

      There's no way around that.  Microsoft doesn't have a procedure for extracting DOS which leads me to believe that it would violate the EULA.  I'm not about to do that.  So you can do as you were advised or not do it at all.  Keep in mind there are other versions of DOS which I have provided links to that you can use.
      Evil is an exact science.

      Cityscape

        Topic Starter


        Adviser

      • Running Debian 8, Linux Mint and Windows 10.
      • Thanked: 15
        • Yes
      • Certifications: List
      • Computer: Specs
      • Experience: Experienced
      • OS: Linux variant
      Re: MS DOS 6.2 Question
      « Reply #21 on: June 27, 2009, 10:20:25 AM »
      Keep in mind there are other versions of DOS which I have provided links to that you can use.
      They're all free right?

      Quantos



        Guru
      • Veni, Vidi, Vici
      • Thanked: 170
        • Yes
        • Yes
      • Computer: Specs
      • Experience: Guru
      • OS: Linux variant
      Re: MS DOS 6.2 Question
      « Reply #22 on: June 27, 2009, 04:17:29 PM »
      Quote
      They're all free right?

      No, they are protected by the EULA and copyright laws.
      You must OWN the license to use them.
      Evil is an exact science.

      BC_Programmer


        Mastermind
      • Typing is no substitute for thinking.
      • Thanked: 1140
        • Yes
        • Yes
        • BC-Programming.com
      • Certifications: List
      • Computer: Specs
      • Experience: Beginner
      • OS: Windows 11
      Re: MS DOS 6.2 Question
      « Reply #23 on: June 28, 2009, 09:33:24 AM »
      heh, I still have the "certificate of authenticity" for my DOS 6...

      the disks have long since become unusable though. Oh well.
      I was trying to dereference Null Pointers before it was cool.

      Cityscape

        Topic Starter


        Adviser

      • Running Debian 8, Linux Mint and Windows 10.
      • Thanked: 15
        • Yes
      • Certifications: List
      • Computer: Specs
      • Experience: Experienced
      • OS: Linux variant
      Re: MS DOS 6.2 Question
      « Reply #24 on: June 28, 2009, 10:33:29 AM »
      Thanks guys, i've found the Dos i need and it's now running Windows 3.11 which is where i'm writing this from using IE 3.

      BC_Programmer


        Mastermind
      • Typing is no substitute for thinking.
      • Thanked: 1140
        • Yes
        • Yes
        • BC-Programming.com
      • Certifications: List
      • Computer: Specs
      • Experience: Beginner
      • OS: Windows 11
      Re: MS DOS 6.2 Question
      « Reply #25 on: June 28, 2009, 11:01:18 AM »
      Thanks guys, i've found the Dos i need and it's now running Windows 3.11 which is where i'm writing this from using IE 3.

      you can get, IE5 on windows 3.1 as well. :)
      I was trying to dereference Null Pointers before it was cool.

      Cityscape

        Topic Starter


        Adviser

      • Running Debian 8, Linux Mint and Windows 10.
      • Thanked: 15
        • Yes
      • Certifications: List
      • Computer: Specs
      • Experience: Experienced
      • OS: Linux variant
      Re: MS DOS 6.2 Question
      « Reply #26 on: June 28, 2009, 11:53:29 AM »
      I get an error message (attached) when trying IE5.  :(

      I don't know how to fix it, i have over 64MB of RAM

      [attachment deleted by admin]

      Quantos



        Guru
      • Veni, Vidi, Vici
      • Thanked: 170
        • Yes
        • Yes
      • Computer: Specs
      • Experience: Guru
      • OS: Linux variant
      Re: MS DOS 6.2 Question
      « Reply #27 on: June 28, 2009, 12:02:24 PM »
      Take a look at this, and tell us what you have allocated.


      [attachment deleted by admin]
      Evil is an exact science.

      BC_Programmer


        Mastermind
      • Typing is no substitute for thinking.
      • Thanked: 1140
        • Yes
        • Yes
        • BC-Programming.com
      • Certifications: List
      • Computer: Specs
      • Experience: Beginner
      • OS: Windows 11
      Re: MS DOS 6.2 Question
      « Reply #28 on: June 28, 2009, 12:22:20 PM »
      I get an error message (attached) when trying IE5.  :(

      I don't know how to fix it, i have over 64MB of RAM

      Do as quantos suggested- you have Too much allocated. I got this error too. But unlike you I was on a real PC, and the smallest DIMM I had was 128MB :(
      I was trying to dereference Null Pointers before it was cool.

      patio

      • Moderator


      • Genius
      • Maud' Dib
      • Thanked: 1769
        • Yes
      • Experience: Beginner
      • OS: Windows 7
      Re: MS DOS 6.2 Question
      « Reply #29 on: June 28, 2009, 12:39:53 PM »
      Also repost your autoexec ang config since we've altered them...
      " Anyone who goes to a psychiatrist should have his head examined. "