The original poster, Matt, started this thread planning on writing the code for a "Decomplier."
Matt plans to take an executable (. exe ) file and find the original bat code.
Matt ask the Computer Hope experts to help him with the exe to bat project.
he doesn't "plan" to do this. It already works. He just needed help with the syntax.
None the Computer Hope experts have offered any help.
Sidewinder fixed the syntax. The batch then worked. additionally, he mentioned how he didn't know what a exe to batch decompiler was. Matt123 kindly explained what it was for sidewinders benefit, at which point you came in singing the praises and magical abilities of the ren command, also implicit was how you think everybody and their mother should use ren to convert all sorts of incompatible file types. While certainly a humourous sidebar to the original thread, it hardly adds any content, let alone useful content. Basically what you did was no better then posting:
haha you noobs you canz convert using ren command see it's eezy:
ren program.exe batchfile.bat
I pwnz!
you experts never doze any help to any of my peeps that come in here, you all bustas.
Actually, that's a lie, it was better. I just wanted to see what your post sounded like in gangsta. It certainly doesn't exclude any content.
Well, know Bill (Marvin), the troll. He has evaded bans numerous times, and serves almost no useful purpose (other than mild entertainment as BC insults him).
no useful purpose? nonsense! His posts are so frequent and illustriously ill-guided that even if he is purposely trolling it's still fun to respond! And since this thread was over already (question asked, problem solved) there was no topic to truly derail, which was certainly his intention. his methods are rather simple:
1. say something totally wrong, and usually entirely irrelevant, or in some cases simply post a random command output. (his favourite seems to be to provide the poster with a listing of his C: drive, not sure how this helps anybody)
2. wait for responses claiming how wrong or misguided he is (at this point, the hope is that the thread will spiral out of control into nostalgia about how much of a troll Billrich is, as it did here)
3. At this point, he strikes! having made no posts other then the completely wrong post with no useful content, he provides the coup de gras in the form of a post outlining that no other expert has provided any help! The best part is that it's largely inaccurate, as it is in this case. Which merely means that he only looked at the thread title and didn't actually look at any of the previous posts.
4.
5. PROFIT!
There is nothing wrong with stating facts:
Good. Then we agree.
You are a troll.
Well that was fun! Now, on to more productive pursuits.
