Welcome guest. Before posting on our computer help forum, you must register. Click here it's easy and free.

Author Topic: Dual core vs hyperthreading?  (Read 2712 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RichLorn

  • Guest
Dual core vs hyperthreading?
« on: July 22, 2005, 02:36:09 AM »
I am planning to purchase a new computer with either an Intel 820 2.8GHZ dual-core chip without hyperthreading, or Intel 630 3GHZ single core with hyperthreading. I understand the advantages of a dual core running multiple applications, but because I (sometimes, but usually) do not run more than one application at a time my question is slightly different.
Given two computers with the same RAM, bus speed, cache, etc. etc., will the performance of a single application running along with the usual background utilities (firewall, anti-virus, anti-spyware, etc) be better with a dual core? Or is a single with hyperthreading just as good? I was thinking that with a dual core, one would run the app while the other would handle the utilities?  Utilities are probably not a very big issue now, but as they get increasingly intricate in the coming years, that may change.
My typical usage is 40% microsoft office, 40% web, and 20% gaming.
Thanks

Gizmo73



    Intermediate

  • We do only what we are meant to do
    Re: Dual core vs hyperthreading?
    « Reply #1 on: July 22, 2005, 10:47:05 AM »
    Even though Hyperthreading has longer pipelines to get more done in a given amount of time, dual-core may still be the better choice, since hyperthreading forces a single-core to consume more power while offering a very little performance increase.

    [glb]Gizmo73[/glb]