Windows Media Player may not be the best choice.
maybe not. But it's not necessarily a bad choice.
Have you thought of using another player if needed?
What reason do you have to suspect another player might be "needed" (and how exactly are you defining "needed" in that context?) Windows Media Player will play files that are on an external drive just as well as they would on a internal drive.
There a number of users who, for some time, have decided not to use the media player that comes with the Windows system.
And most of those users feel they are fighting some kind of war against Microsoft and Internet Explorer. a 'la that toastytech idiot. I mean, really, if you don't like Microsoft, that's fine, but if you continue to use their products and just *censored* about everything instead of, you know- switching to Linux/BSD or another OS, you just like making noise. (Even better, the toastytech guy professes the superiority of... Windows 95! Haha).
Here is just one of such users what rant about why...
Outdated. Site was last updated in 2003, it seems. Which explains why their "alternatives" are so utterly ridiculous. I particularly like how the only mention of anything BSD-based is lower down, all the "alternatives" that are Linux distros are defunct or generally not very popular or maintained anymore. I suppose this is a natural effect of having a site that hasn't been maintained in nearly 10 years though.
Also: the information is wrong. IE wasn't first released in 1996.