Welcome guest. Before posting on our computer help forum, you must register. Click here it's easy and free.

Author Topic: IDE vs. SATA  (Read 8964 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Zylstra

    Topic Starter
  • Moderator


  • Hacker

  • The Techinator!
  • Thanked: 45
    • Yes
    • Technology News and Information
  • Certifications: List
  • Computer: Specs
  • Experience: Guru
  • OS: Windows 7
IDE vs. SATA
« on: April 25, 2007, 09:42:48 PM »
Which one is better, SATA or IDE?
I opened up our Compaq, and was quite surprised to see a SATA cable connecting to the hard drive.
Which brought this question

Is it faster, more reliable, just smaller (no broken pins) or what?

Dusty



    Egghead

  • I could if she would, but she won't so I don't.
  • Thanked: 75
  • Experience: Beginner
  • OS: Windows XP
Re: IDE vs. SATA
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2007, 09:57:15 PM »
Some say they're faster, others say they're better.

This is an extract from here...

"The third standard, serial ATA (SATA), potentially the fastest of them all, could transfer data as fast as 600MB/s now, but the current internal mechanisms of hard drives limit it to being not much faster than standard IDE ATA drives, which can only sustain about 60MB/s in practice."

IMHO Sata has the edge over Ide due to the cables being smaller allowing better airflow in the box.

There's a heck of a lot of reading on that site..

One good deed is worth more than a year of good intentions.

Zylstra

    Topic Starter
  • Moderator


  • Hacker

  • The Techinator!
  • Thanked: 45
    • Yes
    • Technology News and Information
  • Certifications: List
  • Computer: Specs
  • Experience: Guru
  • OS: Windows 7
Re: IDE vs. SATA
« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2007, 10:03:31 PM »
Looking at this image:
http://sierra-cables.com/SATA/Images/SATA-Signal-Cable-1.jpg
I see that there are less pins on the SATA cable than the IDE.

Is the speed in the cable, or the controller?

Dusty



    Egghead

  • I could if she would, but she won't so I don't.
  • Thanked: 75
  • Experience: Beginner
  • OS: Windows XP
Re: IDE vs. SATA
« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2007, 10:16:19 PM »
I'm no guru but, from the reading I have done, the speed is achieved by the transfer rate from actual disk to cache then from there to the controller but is restricted by the physical/mechanical movement of the head(s).   As you will see from the extracted quote in my first reply the transfer rates of Sata vs. Ide are reported as being very similar.

One good deed is worth more than a year of good intentions.

honvetops



    Specialist
  • Hardware rocks ~
  • Thanked: 8
    Re: IDE vs. SATA
    « Reply #4 on: April 26, 2007, 03:21:25 AM »
    just a little bit more info along lines w/ Dusty's good stuff *
     here are specs on identical 7200.10  320 MB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache  seagate cuda's  hd's

    IDE Ultra ATA100:

    Average Seek Time     11ms
    Average Write Time    12ms
    Average Latency    4.16ms

    SATA 3.0Gb/s:

    Average Seek Time     8.5ms
    Average Write Time    10ms
    Average Latency    4.16ms

    many reviews from owners state the speeds are very comparable but theoretically sata II is supposed to be faster up to 1.50 gigs -to- 3.00 gigs a second interface..(adjusting the jumper settings). Sata cables are known to pop out of the hd's  very easily if you move the case a lot but other than that you would have somewhat lower temps in your case and much better air-flow....  the looks and much cleaner view inside the case especially with all the led's flashing....is a nice plus...
    mobo- MSI P6N SLI / LCD Samsung  226BW
    Ram- G-Skill dual HQ / Speakers- 5300e's
    Fatality Hi-Fi Soundcard
    cpu - currently ~ E6600 / Foxfire only
    dual~Seagate 320 gig sata's
    8800 gts- MSI /Verizon Fios
        news is knowledge

    Dusty



      Egghead

    • I could if she would, but she won't so I don't.
    • Thanked: 75
    • Experience: Beginner
    • OS: Windows XP
    Re: IDE vs. SATA
    « Reply #5 on: April 26, 2007, 03:48:53 AM »
    Thank you for that Honvetops.   

    Your figs show that the SATA is faster but who's gonna notice 2 to 2.5ms other than NASA.   I don't associate with any group to whom it would make a difference ;D

    I had thought that SATA would be much faster than UATA (I don't yet have SATA drives) but the info available on the WWW doesn't show that.

    Any heavy users of hdd's like to comment further ???

     
    One good deed is worth more than a year of good intentions.

    honvetops



      Specialist
    • Hardware rocks ~
    • Thanked: 8
      Re: IDE vs. SATA
      « Reply #6 on: April 26, 2007, 04:02:56 AM »
      EXACTLY,  i just got 2 of those cuda 320 satas  and I read many, many reviews from experienced users, you'd have to be a freak to notice any difference...
      i don't...
      mobo- MSI P6N SLI / LCD Samsung  226BW
      Ram- G-Skill dual HQ / Speakers- 5300e's
      Fatality Hi-Fi Soundcard
      cpu - currently ~ E6600 / Foxfire only
      dual~Seagate 320 gig sata's
      8800 gts- MSI /Verizon Fios
          news is knowledge

      WillyW



        Specialist
      • Thanked: 29
      • Experience: Experienced
      • OS: Windows XP
      Re: IDE vs. SATA
      « Reply #7 on: April 26, 2007, 10:01:42 AM »
      ...
      (I don't yet have SATA drives) ...
       

      Me either.

      But, from reading,  I understand that there is no jumpering.  No master/slave.
      Just plug 'em in, and go.

      For some folks, would this fall into the "better" category, when considering?


      .



      honvetops



        Specialist
      • Hardware rocks ~
      • Thanked: 8
        Re: IDE vs. SATA
        « Reply #8 on: April 26, 2007, 10:37:45 AM »
        ...
        (I don't yet have SATA drives) ...
         

        Me either.

        But, from reading,  I understand that there is no jumpering.  No master/slave.
        Just plug 'em in, and go.

        For some folks, would this fall into the "better" category, when considering?




        There are actually "jumpers" on the back of some of those 320 cuda's according to people that bought them at newegg.!!! I didn't have any but more than 10 people in the review section stated they had to switch from 1.5 to 3.0  on theirs ?

        revised* 4-27   yup,  on both my sata drives there are  4 pin jumpers on the back of each ~
          4-28

        called seagate > they instructed me to remove the (tiny) grey piece of plastic that is covering the last 2 pins (4 pins total) all the way on the right .. that is to enable 3.0 mb vs  1.5  on the sata hard drive.

        « Last Edit: April 28, 2007, 05:03:12 AM by honvetops »
        mobo- MSI P6N SLI / LCD Samsung  226BW
        Ram- G-Skill dual HQ / Speakers- 5300e's
        Fatality Hi-Fi Soundcard
        cpu - currently ~ E6600 / Foxfire only
        dual~Seagate 320 gig sata's
        8800 gts- MSI /Verizon Fios
            news is knowledge

        Raptor

        • Guest
        Re: IDE vs. SATA
        « Reply #9 on: April 26, 2007, 12:49:34 PM »
        SATA is better for home machines, better air-flow due to the small wires and slightly increased performance.

        Not to mention that it is easier to install them.

        Zylstra

          Topic Starter
        • Moderator


        • Hacker

        • The Techinator!
        • Thanked: 45
          • Yes
          • Technology News and Information
        • Certifications: List
        • Computer: Specs
        • Experience: Guru
        • OS: Windows 7
        Re: IDE vs. SATA
        « Reply #10 on: April 26, 2007, 02:17:04 PM »
        About the airflow:
        I dont think it really makes a difference. When you think about it, the effect of air making its way around objects counters it out.
        And then again, its not in an area that really needs great airflow. (HDD's do produce heat, but not enough to do all too much dammage in a PC)

        About the ease of install:
        I agree, but it will set you one heck of a good project if you break a pin on an IDE drive :P

        I have never installed a SATA drive, so I cant say anything about how easy it is.
        I have gone through enough IDE drives to get the hang of it.

        Its just odd that they would say SATA is faster, since there are more pins (wires) than the SATA drive, which has, what, 12, maybe?

        Dusty



          Egghead

        • I could if she would, but she won't so I don't.
        • Thanked: 75
        • Experience: Beginner
        • OS: Windows XP
        Re: IDE vs. SATA
        « Reply #11 on: April 26, 2007, 08:17:27 PM »

        About the ease of install:
        I agree, but it will set you one heck of a good project if you break a pin on an IDE drive :P

        I have never installed a SATA drive, so I cant say anything about how easy it is.
        I have gone through enough IDE drives to get the hang of it.

        Its just odd that they would say SATA is faster, since there are more pins (wires) than the SATA drive, which has, what, 12, maybe?

        Seems there's an even chance of breaking a connector on Sata as well.

        Sata pinning is 15 pins for the power supply (one connector) and 7 pins for data (another connector)

        See here...

        I guess we all will go for Sata at some stage.  Also understand that the max number of connectors on the mobo is two but several more can be attached using Raid.

        An adaptor is available to connect Sata to Ide but haven't yet seen one which connects the other way round.

        Thanks all
        One good deed is worth more than a year of good intentions.

        Zylstra

          Topic Starter
        • Moderator


        • Hacker

        • The Techinator!
        • Thanked: 45
          • Yes
          • Technology News and Information
        • Certifications: List
        • Computer: Specs
        • Experience: Guru
        • OS: Windows 7
        Re: IDE vs. SATA
        « Reply #12 on: April 26, 2007, 08:25:13 PM »
        15 PINS FOR POWER!
        WOW!

        I guess they are really equal (until we have faster drives)

        I think its probably all going to SATA since its smaller. (Probably cheaper)

        You know what I cant wait for:
        When every computer device plugs into a universal connector. (Almost like a USB, but faster. A way where all video cards, hdd, monitor, can all be plugged in, detected via BIOS and loaded with a generic driver (or the Driver be downloaded to a ROM/RAM chip from the internet using some sort of LAN that can access the internet before the OS is even loaded.)

        Dusty



          Egghead

        • I could if she would, but she won't so I don't.
        • Thanked: 75
        • Experience: Beginner
        • OS: Windows XP
        Re: IDE vs. SATA
        « Reply #13 on: April 27, 2007, 01:50:19 AM »
        You know what I cant wait for:
        When every computer device plugs into a universal connector. (Almost like a USB, but faster. A way where all video cards, hdd, monitor, can all be plugged in, detected via BIOS and loaded with a generic driver (or the Driver be downloaded to a ROM/RAM chip from the internet using some sort of LAN that can access the internet before the OS is even loaded.)

        And all to happen without user intervention..  Don't you know that Uncle Bill has promised all of that in Windows Later, codename Utopia ???.

        One good deed is worth more than a year of good intentions.

        Raptor

        • Guest
        Re: IDE vs. SATA
        « Reply #14 on: April 27, 2007, 06:55:10 AM »
        Quote
        About the airflow:
        I dont think it really makes a difference. When you think about it, the effect of air making its way around objects counters it out.
        And then again, its not in an area that really needs great airflow. (HDD's do produce heat, but not enough to do all too much dammage in a PC)

        So, you think they create ROUNDED IDE cables for the heck of it?

        « Last Edit: April 27, 2007, 06:26:00 PM by Raptor »

        Dusty



          Egghead

        • I could if she would, but she won't so I don't.
        • Thanked: 75
        • Experience: Beginner
        • OS: Windows XP
        Re: IDE vs. SATA
        « Reply #15 on: April 27, 2007, 04:31:46 PM »
        Hey Raptor - what's doing?    Very quotable quotes but don't seem to have much bearing on Sata vs Ide.   I suppose there must be a connection, all that's missing is the adaptor ;D
        One good deed is worth more than a year of good intentions.

        Raptor

        • Guest
        Re: IDE vs. SATA
        « Reply #16 on: April 27, 2007, 06:26:18 PM »
        Hey Raptor - what's doing?    Very quotable quotes but don't seem to have much bearing on Sata vs Ide.   I suppose there must be a connection, all that's missing is the adaptor ;D

        That's weird, I quoted the wrong person. Thanks.