You once again fail to provide any arguments as to why warez would be wrong. Instead you answer my question with a question. That's something I'm used to seeing on Will & Grace, I thought we could have more serious discussions on this forum.
The only thing I'd mildly agree with is that it would be the same as stealing other people's ideas. Although the software is delivered to the user the same state it is in when the person would buy it, the software isn't really reverse engineered and the original creator his/her/their creation has remained untouched.. Therefore that argument would be mostly invalid.
They just didn't get to cash in on it ! That'll teach the greedy bastards, anyway, should have gone open source in the first place..
And next time, come up with some good arguments.
I see no difference. Just because stealing software or recorded music is easier than stealing a car does not somehow make it any less illegal or immoral. Stealing is stealing.
Would warez be out there if someone wasn't doing something they shouldn't ? ?
Just saying that it is 'wrong' because it is 'theft' and therefore 'immoral' won't quite do.
Because so is over-production and a market economy., but I don't see you overthrowing any governments or boycotting supermarkets.
Besides that, how are you going to coin on zero's and one's? That's all they are. Real life objects have physical properties, they were created from resources taken from the earth; bits and bytes are just electrical impulses that are not directly taken from a limited pile of resources. That's why stealing a car is a much more serious offense than pirating.
Stealing hardware would be theft, 'stealing' software is simply circumventing some people their idea of how these 1's and 0's should be used!