Welcome guest. Before posting on our computer help forum, you must register. Click here it's easy and free.

Author Topic: ComCast settles throttling lawsuit  (Read 3745 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

patio

    Topic Starter
  • Moderator


  • Genius
  • Maud' Dib
  • Thanked: 1769
    • Yes
  • Experience: Beginner
  • OS: Windows 7
ComCast settles throttling lawsuit
« on: December 25, 2009, 09:47:24 AM »
Full Story

You may be entitled to some cabbage...# at the bottom of the Article.
" Anyone who goes to a psychiatrist should have his head examined. "

Broni


    Mastermind
  • Kraków my love :)
  • Thanked: 614
    • Computer Help Forum
  • Computer: Specs
  • Experience: Experienced
  • OS: Windows 8
Re: ComCast settles throttling lawsuit
« Reply #1 on: December 25, 2009, 10:26:41 AM »
Well, this says it all:
Quote
Whoever says the legal system in this country is broken, well, you're right. Comcast was caught tampering with its customers' packets two years ago. It bitched and moaned like nobody's business, earning itself no friends. The Federal Communications Commission sanctioned the gigantic corporation in what amounted to a slap on the wrist. Big deal. A class action lawsuit was filed, which was just settled for $16 million. Comcast raked in $34.3 billion in revenue in 2008, meaning that this settlement amounts to four hours of revenue. That's right: four hours. Take that, corporate America!
...and they're throttling again. This time, they got smarter. They don't target any specific program, or group of programs, they choke a whole bandwidth, whenever they want.

rthompson80819



    Specialist

    Thanked: 94
  • Experience: Experienced
  • OS: Windows 7
Re: ComCast settles throttling lawsuit
« Reply #2 on: December 25, 2009, 12:06:36 PM »
I don't understand why Lotus Notes email was included in the suit.  That's not a high bandwidth service.

Geek-9pm


    Mastermind
  • Geek After Dark
  • Thanked: 1026
    • Gekk9pm bnlog
  • Certifications: List
  • Computer: Specs
  • Experience: Expert
  • OS: Windows 10
Re: ComCast settles throttling lawsuit
« Reply #3 on: December 25, 2009, 03:39:21 PM »
I don't understand why Lotus Notes email was included in the suit.  That's not a high bandwidth service.
Depends wheat you are sending. It is not just e-mail.

BC_Programmer


    Mastermind
  • Typing is no substitute for thinking.
  • Thanked: 1140
    • Yes
    • Yes
    • BC-Programming.com
  • Certifications: List
  • Computer: Specs
  • Experience: Beginner
  • OS: Windows 11
Re: ComCast settles throttling lawsuit
« Reply #4 on: December 25, 2009, 04:24:37 PM »
I don't understand why Lotus Notes email was included in the suit.  That's not a high bandwidth service.

It probably followed a pattern that made the service throttle it like it did P2P programs.
I was trying to dereference Null Pointers before it was cool.

rthompson80819



    Specialist

    Thanked: 94
  • Experience: Experienced
  • OS: Windows 7
Re: ComCast settles throttling lawsuit
« Reply #5 on: December 26, 2009, 01:34:33 AM »
When I did that post I didn't think it all the way through.  When I was on Notes, 99% of what we sent and received was basic email and report updating.  But that was just us.

I can imagine companies like architect's sending big CAD attachments for comments and changes and using a lot of bandwidth.

Ironman



    Hopeful
  • Virtus, Veneratio, Fidelitas
  • Thanked: 15
    • Yes
    • My Personal Site
  • Certifications: List
  • Computer: Specs
  • Experience: Expert
  • OS: Windows 10
Re: ComCast settles throttling lawsuit
« Reply #6 on: December 29, 2009, 01:20:20 PM »
But how much money would each person receive from this lawsuit? It it even worth it? Because Lexmark payed a lot of money for falsely advertising how much each memory each of their flashdrives contained and besides the lawyers and the people who originally sued ever other affected individual wast like given 50 cents, because they had to split the payment.
« Last Edit: December 29, 2009, 03:06:47 PM by Ironman »