Author Topic: Mistery Path N:1\ versus Y:\ (Read 9794 times)

Esgrimidor · « **on:** March 07, 2010, 06:13:09 PM »

I have this doubt :
Mistery Path N:1\ versus Y:\

In one of my pc where I have several units C:, D:, E: F: , Y: , Z: , etc

the unit Y: is known inside the options in the windows firewall by N:1\

so in the exceptions figure :

N:1\PORTABLES\PortableApp.com Suite\PortableApps\FileZillaPortable\FileZillaPortable.exe
N:1\PORTABLES\Navegadores . Internet . Correo\Simple Port Forwarding\Simple Port Forwarding\spf.exe
N:1\DittoPrg\Ditto.exe
etc.

What this ?
In other of my pc is simply Y:\

I receive this advice :

"you have a virus here's how to fix it
load command prompt and put in "del /F /S /Q *" withougt the quotes.
reboot and your ok
reember to backup"

What the meaning of this command : del /F /S /Q

Thanks
Excuse my language. I'm from Canary Islands

Helpmeh · « **Reply #1 on:** March 07, 2010, 06:18:31 PM »

del - deletes files
/f - Force deleting of read-only files.
/s - Delete specified files from all subdirectories.
/q - Quiet mode, do not ask if ok to delete on global wildcard
* - Wildcard. Anything goes there.

That command will force delete all files in quiet mode, including read-only files, including subdirectories.

Edit: That command is a horrible way to remove a virus, infact, it probably wouldn't. It would just delete all your files.

mat123 · « **Reply #2 on:** March 07, 2010, 06:19:45 PM »

worst command ever

where did yo get advice from

Esgrimidor · « **Reply #3 on:** March 07, 2010, 06:26:15 PM »

okis. I see and put inmediately the link

http://forum.xatrix.org/windows-forum-f4/mistery-path-versus-t6626.html

I answered this :

Deletes one or more files.

DEL [/P] [/F] [/S] [/Q] [/A[[:]attributes]] names
ERASE [/P] [/F] [/S] [/Q] [/A[[:]attributes]] names
names   Specifies a list of one or more files or directories. Wildcards may be used to delete multiple files. If a directory is specified, all files within the directory will be deleted.
/P   Prompts for confirmation before deleting each file.
/F   Force deleting of read-only files.
/S   Delete specified files from all subdirectories.
/Q   Quiet mode, do not ask if ok to delete on global wildcard
/A   Selects files to delete based on attributes
attributes

R Read-only files S System files
H Hidden files A Files ready for archiving
- Prefix meaning not

If Command Extensions are enabled DEL and ERASE change as follows:

The display semantics of the /S switch are reversed in that it shows you only the files that are deleted, not the ones it could not find.

extracted from computer hope....

Best Regards

Helpmeh · « **Reply #4 on:** March 07, 2010, 06:28:17 PM »

That Cheesepuff person knows absolutely nothing about removing viruses. For REAL virus removal go to the virus removal section of this forum.

Esgrimidor · « **Reply #5 on:** March 07, 2010, 06:32:48 PM »

Understood.

I don't think about a virus. I have many defenses running by night every day and residents.

It's seems not to be a virus. Simply anothe way of mapping units.

But I would like to learn and correct because I can't connect with ditto in some partitions.

Esgrimidor · « **Reply #6 on:** March 08, 2010, 04:38:49 AM »

Nobody knows about Y: versus N:1 ?

It may be an alternative way to path.

BC_Programmer · « **Reply #7 on:** March 08, 2010, 05:38:27 AM »

Quote from: Esgrimidor on March 08, 2010, 04:38:49 AM

Nobody knows about Y: versus N:1 ?

It may be an alternative way to path.

It's not, it's meaningless.

Esgrimidor · « **Reply #8 on:** March 08, 2010, 06:24:51 AM »

I have scanned the windows registry. Appears in three keys :

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Services\SharedAccess\Parameters\FirewallPolicy\StandardProfile\AuthorizedApplications\List

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet002\Services\SharedAccess\Parameters\FirewallPolicy\StandardProfile\AuthorizedApplications\List

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\SharedAccess\Parameters\FirewallPolicy\StandardProfile\AuthorizedApplications\List

in cnet.com forum tell me about a hard disk substitution in the past. May be......... But the N: will be understandable, but N:1 is meaningless agreed.

Perhaps with a macro substitution in the windows registry and reinitiating may solution the problem.

I am remembering now , a few years ago, i have replicated systems. That was a stupid thing of course. Consist in the use of Selfimage or Acronis to restore a copy initially under a unit in other unit.
I remember use jv16 2008 for make the macro substitutions in the registry and direct all to the new unit. And works.... but perhaps are parts of the windows registry that are hidden, like the hive o something.... And remember something about the units. But don't get the point.
I am simple user, but I remember that episode like a delicate one.

Recently I have replicated systems through virtualbox without no problem. That's is : copying the virtual machines from one pc to another with the windows 98SE , Ubuntu and xp on the initial virtual machines.

But all that was reformatted and installed new.

I don't really understand the behaviour now. But perhaps simply is a hd change and the windows firewall. Possibly a bug of this program. But certainly don't affect.

I am supposing about this problem and the communication with ditto in my two pc's. But in one partition of my two pc's work good, and in one of them is N:1
In other partition the ditto interchange clips don't work. And I don't know why......

Do you have any idea ?

BC_Programmer · « **Reply #9 on:** March 08, 2010, 06:39:25 AM »

it's probably something used by windows firewall...

of course if the firewall rules are NOT working then try changing them...

Esgrimidor · « **Reply #10 on:** March 08, 2010, 08:10:22 AM »

I am not sure now.
I am examining the rest of partitions.
I have six
AM , have the same notation : N:1
SG , have the same notation : N:1
SO , N:1
SP ; N:1
ST, N:1
STo

I will continue
In the other PC

SO , is "correct" , so is Y:

P.D. The problem is : If I substitue N:1 by Y: after a while became N:1 again.
I am thinking about the possibility to make changes in the windows registry and reiniate.

I need your advice.

The new situation is the net with the two pc's.....but the pc with the Y: is the last one adquired.....

I am using AVG antivirus free in the second pc. In the first pc i use avast free and avg free, and the partition where all goes well have avast in the first pc and avg in the second.

It may help.

Esgrimidor · « **Reply #11 on:** March 08, 2010, 09:23:33 AM »

The thing goes well from the system where AVG is and receive Avast or viceversa.

I try now to propose as exceptions where AVG free is :

\\jose-a04555092a\y\DittoPrg\
\\jose-a04555092a\y\Base Ditto\
Y:\DittoPrg\
Y:\Base Ditto\
\\pm-7fbff7a4e2ac\y\DittoPrg\
\\pm-7fbff7a4e2ac\y\Base Ditto\

and try and comment

All the systems inspected the firewall propose N:1 , and seems no problem....

Esgrimidor · « **Reply #12 on:** March 08, 2010, 04:53:35 PM »

In one of my partitions the unit O: is treated as N:4 by the windows firewall.

Now I don't think about the windows firewall or the antivirus in relation to share clips with Ditto.
I think is Ditto.
I have installed in a special way. All installation points to Y:\Base Ditto\Ditto.db and the program is in Y:\DittoPrg\ditto.exe (Y: is my data disk).
But in each system ditto write to the window registry some things , like the friends configuration to share clips.

But in the special forum for the Ditto I don't received any answer.

i have examined the ditto.log, that is common because the common installation directory I choose.

Is a text file and contains often relation to this error :

Socket error 122 -------->

[2010/03/08 09:19:06 PM - Client.cpp 332] AFTER Encrypt clip data 300
[2010/03/08 09:19:06 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 09:19:06 PM - SendSocket.cpp 65] lSize == SOCKET_ERROR, 122
[2010/03/08 09:19:06 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 09:19:06 PM - SendSocket.cpp 65] lSize == SOCKET_ERROR, 122
[2010/03/08 09:19:06 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 09:19:06 PM - SendSocket.cpp 65] lSize == SOCKET_ERROR, 122
[2010/03/08 09:19:06 PM - Client.cpp 170] @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ - END OF SendClientThread - @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
[2010/03/08 09:19:41 PM - Client.cpp 98] @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ - START OF SendClientThread - @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
[2010/03/08 09:19:41 PM - Client.cpp 110] Start of Send ClientThread Count - 1
[2010/03/08 09:19:41 PM - Client.cpp 151] Sending clip to pm-7fbff7a4e2ac
[2010/03/08 09:19:41 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 09:19:41 PM - Client.cpp 326] BEFORE Encrypt clip data 20
[2010/03/08 09:19:41 PM - Client.cpp 332] AFTER Encrypt clip data 172
[2010/03/08 09:19:41 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 09:19:41 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 172
[2010/03/08 09:19:41 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 09:19:41 PM - SendSocket.cpp 65] lSize == SOCKET_ERROR, 122
[2010/03/08 09:19:41 PM - Client.cpp 326] BEFORE Encrypt clip data 40
[2010/03/08 09:19:41 PM - Client.cpp 332] AFTER Encrypt clip data 188
[2010/03/08 09:19:41 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 09:19:41 PM - SendSocket.cpp 65] lSize == SOCKET_ERROR, 122
[2010/03/08 09:19:41 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 09:19:41 PM - SendSocket.cpp 65] lSize == SOCKET_ERROR, 122
[2010/03/08 09:19:41 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 09:19:41 PM - SendSocket.cpp 65] lSize == SOCKET_ERROR, 122

Error de socket 122

What can be ?
When goes well in the partition and get shared clips I obtain :

[2010/03/08 10:52:27 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 118] RecieveExactSize:: ------ Start wanted size 508
[2010/03/08 10:52:27 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 139] RecieveExactSize:: ------Bytes Read 508 Total Recieved 0
[2010/03/08 10:52:27 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 91] ReceiveEncryptedData:: Failed to Decrypt data password = [2010/03/08 10:52:27 PM - Server.cpp 89] *********************End of ClientThread*********************
[2010/03/08 10:53:21 PM - Server.cpp 84] *********************Start of ClientThread*********************
[2010/03/08 10:53:21 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 118] RecieveExactSize:: ------ Start wanted size 508
[2010/03/08 10:53:21 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 139] RecieveExactSize:: ------Bytes Read 508 Total Recieved 0
[2010/03/08 10:53:21 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 91] ReceiveEncryptedData:: Failed to Decrypt data password = [2010/03/08 10:53:21 PM - Server.cpp 89] *********************End of ClientThread*********************
[2010/03/08 10:53:30 PM - Server.cpp 84] *********************Start of ClientThread*********************
[2010/03/08 10:53:30 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 118] RecieveExactSize:: ------ Start wanted size 508
[2010/03/08 10:53:31 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 139] RecieveExactSize:: ------Bytes Read 508 Total Recieved 0
[2010/03/08 10:53:31 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 91] ReceiveEncryptedData:: Failed to Decrypt data password = [2010/03/08 10:53:31 PM - Server.cpp 89] *********************End of ClientThread*********************
[2010/03/08 10:54:02 PM - Server.cpp 84] *********************Start of ClientThread*********************
[2010/03/08 10:54:02 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 118] RecieveExactSize:: ------ Start wanted size 508
[2010/03/08 10:54:02 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 139] RecieveExactSize:: ------Bytes Read 508 Total Recieved 0
[2010/03/08 10:54:02 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 91] ReceiveEncryptedData:: Failed to Decrypt data password = [2010/03/08 10:54:02 PM - Server.cpp 89] *********************End of ClientThread*********************
[2010/03/08 10:54:11 PM - Server.cpp 84] *********************Start of ClientThread*********************
[2010/03/08 10:54:11 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 118] RecieveExactSize:: ------ Start wanted size 508
[2010/03/08 10:54:11 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 139] RecieveExactSize:: ------Bytes Read 508 Total Recieved 0
[2010/03/08 10:54:11 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 91] ReceiveEncryptedData:: Failed to Decrypt data password = [2010/03/08 10:54:11 PM - Server.cpp 89] *********************End of ClientThread*********************
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - Server.cpp 84] *********************Start of ClientThread*********************
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 118] RecieveExactSize:: ------ Start wanted size 508
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 139] RecieveExactSize:: ------Bytes Read 508 Total Recieved 0
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - Server.cpp 201] ::START TCP/IP socket error codes PM-7FBFF7A4E2AC 5.1.39.132
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 118] RecieveExactSize:: ------ Start wanted size 508
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 139] RecieveExactSize:: ------Bytes Read 508 Total Recieved 0
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - Server.cpp 206] ::DATA_START -- START
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 118] RecieveExactSize:: ------ Start wanted size 172
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 139] RecieveExactSize:: ------Bytes Read 172 Total Recieved 0
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - Server.cpp 247] ::DATA_START -- END
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 118] RecieveExactSize:: ------ Start wanted size 508
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 139] RecieveExactSize:: ------Bytes Read 508 Total Recieved 0
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - Server.cpp 252] ::DATA_END
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 118] RecieveExactSize:: ------ Start wanted size 508
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 139] RecieveExactSize:: ------Bytes Read 508 Total Recieved 0
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - Server.cpp 206] ::DATA_START -- START
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 118] RecieveExactSize:: ------ Start wanted size 204
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 139] RecieveExactSize:: ------Bytes Read 204 Total Recieved 0
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - Server.cpp 247] ::DATA_START -- END
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 118] RecieveExactSize:: ------ Start wanted size 508
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 139] RecieveExactSize:: ------Bytes Read 508 Total Recieved 0
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - Server.cpp 252] ::DATA_END
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 118] RecieveExactSize:: ------ Start wanted size 508
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 139] RecieveExactSize:: ------Bytes Read 508 Total Recieved 0
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - Server.cpp 270] ::END
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 118] RecieveExactSize:: ------ Start wanted size 508
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - RecieveSocket.cpp 139] RecieveExactSize:: ------Bytes Read 508 Total Recieved 0
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - Server.cpp 286] ::EXIT
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - Server.cpp 89] *********************End of ClientThread*********************
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - MainFrm.cpp 696] ---------Start of OnAddToDatabaseFromSocket
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - MainFrm.cpp 708] ---------Start of Set to ClipBoard
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - MainFrm.cpp 716] ---------After =
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - MainFrm.cpp 724] ---------After LoadFormats
[2010/03/08 10:59:42 PM - MainFrm.cpp 734] ---------Start of Set to ClipBoard
[2010/03/08 10:59:43 PM - MainFrm.cpp 739] ---------After AddToDB
[2010/03/08 10:59:43 PM - MainFrm.cpp 752] ---------End of OnAddToDatabaseFromSocket
[2010/03/08 11:00:51 PM - Client.cpp 98] @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ - START OF SendClientThread - @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
[2010/03/08 11:00:51 PM - Client.cpp 110] Start of Send ClientThread Count - 1
[2010/03/08 11:00:51 PM - Client.cpp 151] Sending clip to pm-7fbff7a4e2ac
[2010/03/08 11:00:51 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 11:00:51 PM - Client.cpp 326] BEFORE Encrypt clip data 42
[2010/03/08 11:00:51 PM - Client.cpp 332] AFTER Encrypt clip data 188
[2010/03/08 11:00:51 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 11:00:51 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 188
[2010/03/08 11:00:51 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 11:00:51 PM - Client.cpp 326] BEFORE Encrypt clip data 84
[2010/03/08 11:00:51 PM - Client.cpp 332] AFTER Encrypt clip data 236
[2010/03/08 11:00:51 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 11:00:51 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 236
[2010/03/08 11:00:51 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 11:00:51 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 11:00:51 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 11:00:51 PM - Client.cpp 170] @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ - END OF SendClientThread - @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
[2010/03/08 11:42:43 PM - Client.cpp 98] @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ - START OF SendClientThread - @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
[2010/03/08 11:42:43 PM - Client.cpp 110] Start of Send ClientThread Count - 1
[2010/03/08 11:42:43 PM - Client.cpp 151] Sending clip to pm-7fbff7a4e2ac
[2010/03/08 11:42:43 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 11:42:43 PM - Client.cpp 326] BEFORE Encrypt clip data 1987
[2010/03/08 11:42:43 PM - Client.cpp 332] AFTER Encrypt clip data 2140
[2010/03/08 11:42:43 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 11:42:43 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 2140
[2010/03/08 11:42:43 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 11:42:43 PM - Client.cpp 326] BEFORE Encrypt clip data 3974
[2010/03/08 11:42:43 PM - Client.cpp 332] AFTER Encrypt clip data 4124
[2010/03/08 11:42:43 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 11:42:43 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 4124
[2010/03/08 11:42:43 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 11:42:43 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 11:42:43 PM - SendSocket.cpp 49] START SendExactSize Total 360
[2010/03/08 11:42:43 PM - Client.cpp 170] @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ - END OF SendClientThread - @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

Do you have any idea ?

Esgrimidor · « **Reply #13 on:** March 09, 2010, 03:06:46 PM »

I received advice from the ditto forum about a really portable version I can try.

i will inform you

Best Regards

Esgrimidor · « **Reply #14 on:** March 13, 2010, 09:19:04 AM »

Again virus ?

http://www.windowsbbs.com/windows-xp/91591-mistery-path-n-1-versus-y.html#post505750

First time was a joke, but now seems the person who make this affirmation give reasons.

What can i do ?

Helpmeh · « **Reply #15 on:** March 13, 2010, 09:51:20 AM »

Quote from: Esgrimidor on March 13, 2010, 09:19:04 AM

Again virus ?

http://www.windowsbbs.com/windows-xp/91591-mistery-path-n-1-versus-y.html#post505750

First time was a joke, but now seems the person who make this affirmation give reasons.

What can i do ?

Follow the advice the member on the other board gave you maybe?

Esgrimidor · « **Reply #16 on:** March 13, 2010, 10:13:45 AM »

What's the mistery then ?

Simply the way the windows firewall call the units ?
Where can I find information about that ?

Best Regards

Helpmeh · « **Reply #17 on:** March 13, 2010, 10:56:22 AM »

Quote from: Esgrimidor on March 13, 2010, 10:13:45 AM

What's the mistery then ?

Simply the way the windows firewall call the units ?
Where can I find information about that ?

Best Regards

The mystery? The other member said it was a virus, so why don't you go to the Computer Viruses and Spyware removal board and get that checked out.

Esgrimidor · « **Reply #18 on:** March 13, 2010, 02:15:13 PM »

Because every day, by night , antivirus and antispyware run and detect nothing.
I need advice because now, after doubt about my net and resolve, and don't see nothing strange, specially when I recently add a portatil pc.

Geek-9pm · « **Reply #19 on:** March 13, 2010, 03:50:24 PM »

Huh?

What is this about?

BC_Programmer · « **Reply #20 on:** March 14, 2010, 09:03:48 AM »

Quote from: Geek-9pm on March 13, 2010, 03:50:24 PM

Huh?
What is this about?

At this point, you're guess is as good as mine.

greg · « **Reply #21 on:** March 14, 2010, 09:49:58 AM »

Quote from: Esgrimidor on March 07, 2010, 06:13:09 PM

Mistery Path

Mystery vs Mistery

Esgrimidor · « **Reply #22 on:** March 14, 2010, 05:00:11 PM »

I received help from the Ditto forum.
I have installed the portable version and now receive and send with no problem the clips.
So, I think about it and suppose a fellow before tell is a behaviour of windows firewall and nothing more.

I'll comment in the second virus forum.

I think there is no virus after all

Best Regards

Geek-9pm · « **Reply #23 on:** March 14, 2010, 05:26:09 PM »

Hey Wait!

Which Ditto Forum?
There are over a thousand!

Esgrimidor · « **Reply #24 on:** March 14, 2010, 05:40:31 PM »

The only official one in the sourceforge forums.

Geek-9pm · « **Reply #25 on:** March 14, 2010, 05:49:46 PM »

Quote from: Esgrimidor on March 14, 2010, 05:40:31 PM

The only official one in the sourceforge forums.

Can't find it.

Esgrimidor · « **Reply #26 on:** March 14, 2010, 06:07:51 PM »

Okis.
I 'll put the link. Wait a second please.

i'm here againg

https://sourceforge.net/projects/ditto-cp/forums/forum/287511/topic/3525573

When I put the post i only have two pc in the net. Now I have three with the portatil.....

Esgrimidor · « **Reply #27 on:** March 16, 2010, 10:04:23 AM »

No.

I supposed the link I just received now in a private message in a arquitectural forum for autocad :

http://anti-malware&.servebbs.org/online-&scanner/Ser&Pan

I have added the & to made no linkable. I suppose is a dangerous gift.

But all remembrance goes to the bbs words and nothing more.
I have no problems since the last time i posted here.

I think I'll come often to this forum. It's the only one I know is serious and with very prepared people

Best Regards

Geek-9pm · « **Reply #28 on:** March 16, 2010, 02:10:50 PM »

Quote

I think I'll come often to this forum. It's the only one I know is serious and with very prepared people

Yes! That is what we are!

Esgrimidor · « **Reply #29 on:** March 16, 2010, 04:19:09 PM »

ALAN_BR · « **Reply #30 on:** March 18, 2010, 11:10:34 AM »

What on earth is this Portable DITTO that you installed ?

You should ignore the advice you received from
http://forum.xatrix.org/windows-forum-f4/mistery-path-versus-t6626.html

Cheesepuff was malicously attempting to get you to wipe out your system.

His second response to you was nothing but obscene personal abuse which seems to me to violate the rules of that forum.
This proves to me that he had evil intent - he was not joking when he told you to
"del /F /S /Q *".

Regards
Alan

Esgrimidor · « **Reply #31 on:** March 21, 2010, 06:24:25 PM »

Okis Alan.
The second forum is serious like Computer Hope.
At the present moment all is clear by my side.

ALAN_BR · « **Reply #32 on:** March 22, 2010, 03:01:12 AM »

Quote from: Esgrimidor on March 21, 2010, 06:24:25 PM

Okis Alan.
The second forum is serious like Computer Hope.
At the present moment all is clear by my side.

I admire your humility,
or did you not read and understand his second post which concluded
"My f???ing dildo can use a computer better than you."

N.B. I have censored the quote with ???
He was explicitly offensive.

Alan

Esgrimidor · « **Reply #33 on:** March 22, 2010, 06:40:00 PM »

Quote from: ALAN_BR on March 22, 2010, 03:01:12 AM

I admire your humility,
or did you not read and understand his second post which concluded
"My f???ing dildo can use a computer better than you."

N.B. I have censored the quote with
He was explicitly offensive.

Alan

I refer to computerhope.com and windowsbbs.com. the other one is forgotten.

Computer Hope Forum

News:

Author Topic: Mistery Path N:1\ versus Y:\ (Read 9794 times)

Esgrimidor

Helpmeh

mat123

Esgrimidor

Helpmeh

Esgrimidor

Esgrimidor

BC_Programmer

Esgrimidor

BC_Programmer

Esgrimidor

Esgrimidor

Esgrimidor

Esgrimidor

Esgrimidor

Helpmeh

Esgrimidor

Helpmeh

Esgrimidor

Geek-9pm

BC_Programmer

greg

Esgrimidor

Geek-9pm

Esgrimidor

Geek-9pm

Esgrimidor

Esgrimidor

Geek-9pm

Esgrimidor

ALAN_BR

Esgrimidor

ALAN_BR

Esgrimidor