I had pretty nasty experiences on other "family-friendly" forums with the word in question, and as some have noticed my previous trangressions of conduct here in this forum, I have already had a second warning... and I do not want to use my last warning up.
It would be faster IF you are low on disk space, and if it was a faster spin speed than your old drive. e.g. if old drive was 5400RPM and new is 7200RPM it will be faster.
I totally agree with the RPM part-there is a noticeable difference (up to 21 sec-measured with a stopwatch
) booting ubuntu on a fujitsu MHV 5400 RPM drive (2004) versus a Fujitsu MHZ drive(2008). both are 2.5 in. SATA drives primarily used for laptops.
If you are low on disk space, why would windows boot faster....?
Consumers are drawn to tablet devices, because of their speed. The iPad, as said above, has this mystique to it-it has all your data at hand and provides an admittedly convenient way to access them-you want a stripped down version of the office suite to work on the go? No problem, with DocsToGo. You want a photo-editing suite similar to GIMP? No Problem-Sketchbook Pro. They want instant standby and instant recover. Plus it is a known fact that those with a little more cash to spend go for such devices-Apple has its own niche. (I don't have an iPad nor am I ever expecting to have anything similar to the iPad within 10 years.) I have digressed too much.
With hard drives (with magnetic spindle), I think it all boils down to RPM and disk space, which will both get cheaper in the future.