Nice catch. The use of Rfid chips is much more widespread that I thought. A study wazs made tagt led to the conclusion that many Americans already have some kind of chip embeded whether the know it or not.
So many dentisits do it. Now this is not the kind of thing where you can track somebody down the street. Rather, a device taht cn be detected at a very close range only. A probe has to be very close to the chip. It is on the order of two iinches, about 5 cm
This means that if people want it, we couldget rid of plastice credit cards, never catty case and we don;t have to sigh in to our computers and never use passwords again.
Yes, DNa testing would be better.
Hey! How about you and I go together and patent a impl;ant chip that will read the DNA of cells in contact with the thing. We could bwe rich!
No, wait... somebody already did that.
Has not been fully developed yet. We are too late.
The groundwork was sstudied back in 2000.
https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/28/16/3011/2383737Abstract
Wide-scale DNA testing requires the development of small, fast and easy-to-use devices. This article describes the preparation, operation and applications of biosensors and gene chips, which provide fast, sensitive and selective detection of DNA hybridization. Various new strategies for DNA biosensors and gene chips are examined, along with recent trends and future directions. The integration of hybridization detection schemes with the sample preparation process in a ‘Lab-on-a-Chip’ format is also covered. While the use of DNA biosensors and gene chips is at an early stage, such devices are expected to have an enormous effect on future DNA diagnostics.