This forum has suffered many religion posts, and luckily, there have been moderators to remove them. Everyone here is trying to stop people like "Mac" and all of his aliases already.
Big difference. None of the people discussing the topic were raving lunatics, and Mac had no respect or tolerance for the opinions of others.
I do not believe that the post should have been removed myself, but obviously, DL65 thought that it was in his best interest to remove it.
DL65 is a moderator, and has done what he feels is making the boards better.
Based on his personal opinion, and without inviting the input of the parties involved prior. The half dozen or so people participating in the thread would beg to differ that the thread was inappropriate, but apparently those opinions didn't merit serious consideration. It was a heavy-handed approach which could have, and should have, been handled differently.
Is this abuse of power? That's not for any of us to say. That's up to the admin...
Then it should be left up to the admin. Even with privileges, I would never even consider the notion of wiping out an entire thread without first bouncing it off Nathan, regardless of my motivations. It's just a little too easy.
Is it just religion? How about the occasional political reference that doesn't have direct relevance to IT? Or a comment on world affairs? Or the weather? It's a big forum, and the occasional dalliance won't bring it to its knees. Is there anything in the ComputerHope rules that prohibits particular topics of discussion? I can't find it.