Welcome guest. Before posting on our computer help forum, you must register. Click here it's easy and free.
Computer Hope forum e-mail issues and down time
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
# FAT12: The oldest type of FAT uses a 12-bit binary number to hold the cluster number. A volume formatted using FAT12 can hold a maximum of 4,086 clusters, which is 2^12 minus a few values (to allow for reserved values to be used in the FAT). FAT12 is therefore most suitable for smaller volumes, and is used on floppy disks and hard disk partitions smaller than about 16 MB.# FAT16: The FAT used for most hard disk partitions uses a 16-bit binary number to hold cluster numbers. When you see someone refer to a "FAT" volume generically, they are usually referring to FAT16, because it is the de facto standard for hard disks. A volume using FAT16 can hold a maximum of 65,526 clusters, which is 2^16 less a few values (again for reserved values in the FAT). FAT16 is used for hard disk volumes ranging in size from 16 MB to 2,048 MB.# FAT32: The newest FAT type, FAT32 is supported by Windows 95's OEM SR2 release, as well as Windows 98. FAT32 uses a 28-bit binary cluster number--not 32, because 4 of the 32 bits are "reserved". 28 bits is still enough to permit ridiculously huge volumes--FAT32 can theoretically handle volumes with over 268 million clusters, and will support (theoretically) drives up to 2 TB in size. However to do this the size of the FAT grows very large.
So if you have a small Hard Drive it will not be able to put 65,526 Cluters because it will not be able to fit them all on the Hard Drive RIGHT???
If you use FAT 16 on a Big or Small Hard Drive it must cover the whole Hard Drive with Cluters RIGHT???
Drive Size FAT Type Sectors Cluster (logical volume) Per Cluster Size ---------------- -------- ----------- ------- 0 MB - 15 MB 12-bit 8 4K 16 MB - 127 MB 16-bit 4 2K 128 MB - 255 MB 16-bit 8 4K 256 MB - 511 MB 16-bit 16 8K 512 MB - 1023 MB 16-bit 32 16K 1024 MB - 2047 MB 16-bit 64 32K
No, the cluster number remains the same but the cluster size diminishes.
So I see that the Cluster size changes because every Setor is 412 Bytes in size and it may take more or less of them to make every Cluster RIGHT?Huh??
32.52 MB divided by 0.5 kB is how many clusters.
260 MB divided by 0.5 kB is how many clusters.
2 TB divided by 32 kB is how many clusters.
OK I am geting lost1024 M.B. We would say ONE thousand twentyfour MillionRIGHT
These terms are usually used in the world of computing to describe disk space, or data storage space, and system memory. For instance, just a few years ago we were describing hard drive space using the term Megabytes. Today, Gigabytes is the most common term being used to describe the size of a hard drive. In the not so distant future, Terabyte will be a common term. But what are they? This is where it gets quite confusing because there are at least three accepted definitions of each term. According to the IBM Dictionary of computing, when used to describe disk storage capacity, a megabyte is 1,000,000 bytes in decimal notation. But when the term megabyte is used for real and virtual storage, and channel volume, 2 to the 20th power or 1,048,576 bytes is the appropriate notation. According to the Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary, a megabyte means either 1,000,000 bytes or 1,048,576 bytes. According to Eric S. Raymond in The New Hacker's Dictionary, a megabyte is always 1,048,576 bytes on the argument that bytes should naturally be computed in powers of two. So which definition do most people conform to? When referring to a megabyte for disk storage, the hard drive manufacturers use the standard that a megabyte is 1,000,000 bytes. This means that when you buy an 80 Gigabyte Hard drive you will get a total of 80,000,000,000 bytes of available storage. This is where it gets confusing because Windows uses the 1,048,576 byte rule so when you look at the Windows drive properties an 80 Gigabyte drive will report a capacity of 74.56 Gigabytes. Anybody confused yet? With three accepted definitions, there will always be some confusion so I will try to simplify the definitions a little. The 1000 can be replaced with 1024 and still be correct using the other acceptable standards. Both of these standards are correct depending on what type of storage you are referring.
Sigh...
So all of these would be right.1 kB = 1,000 Bytes1 kB = 1,280 Bytes X 1KB=1024 bytes1 MB = 1,000,000 Bytes1 MB = 1,024 Bytes X 1MB =1024 KB1 MB = 1,048,576 Bytes
If you see something that says 512 MB you will write it as 512,000,000 but if you see something that says 1024 MB you will write 1,024,000 am I RIGHT ON just this
mega 1,000,000 or 10^6. A prefix meaning one million. As in 100 megaton or 100,000,000 tons.
Quote from: nymph4 on October 07, 2008, 10:39:07 AMIf you see something that says 512 MB you will write it as 512,000,000 but if you see something that says 1024 MB you will write 1,024,000 am I RIGHT ON just thisYour first is right the second wrong!!! Remember - Mega = 10^6 - You have written 1024 Mb as 1024 Kb - you left off three zeros!1024 Mb could as easily be termed 1.024Gb! - 1,024,000,000Check out what powers of 10 actually do!
So 1012 MB = 1,012,000,000RIGHT I get it now
My champagne hasn't arrived yet - but I'll enjoy it when it does!!!!
it took 3 pages to understand binary and standard metric...
But say you wanted to make Cluster Sizes a sertan Size can you do this?
I'm never gonna make it thru this A+ exam.....