they know nothing only what they are told , instead of opening their
minds and listening
interesting- "opening minds and listening" involves listening to Al Gores propagandous BS.
Do you really think he would have created that film if he had been president? Of course not. he wouldn't need a vector to become famous.
How about this- provide some PROOF. they can say "humans cause this" and "humans cause that" until their *censored* bleeds but it isn't going to suddenly create conclusive evidence.
Just because it's a supposed planet-wide phenomena we should just believe it for the good of the planet?
It's a
NATURAL
CYCLE
the earth went through a LOT of warming and cooling periods in it's 4.5 billion years of existence. to say that use mere humans can somehow cause the planet to become inhospitable isn't just trying to stroke our own ego and make us seem important, it's ignorant, which is ironic because the very same term is used for us "heretics" who decide that just because some politician decides to create some bogus film and talk out his *censored* for the last 9 years it must be true.
I'm not saying we should throw our garbage in the oceans and throw caution to the wind. we obviously need to keep the earth a pleasant place to live; what I'm saying is I'm tired of these so-called experts merely quoting what a politician said as some sort of proof. It's not proof, it's heresay.
The "evidence" they have says that the co2 level in the atmosphere
correlates with rising temperatures. And somehow, they discard their scientific theory and automatically say they are related- they probably aren't.
The fact remains that the earth went through a very warm period in the mesozoic. The abundance of tropical plants in what is now temperate zones provides proof of this. PHYSICAL proof. What do they have for human-caused global warming. a god *censored* chart. any yahoo can chart data. a scientist should ask himself where these values came from- did the equipment differ, have different accuracies? But of course not, no reason to.
The worst part of it all is "global warming" never actually has to occur. It's not something like Y2K where there is a set point. temperatures could DROP for years, but "environmental scientists" (apparently this is a synonym for whining loser presidential candidates with a complex for being some sort of public figurehead) can just keep saying- "THE POLAR ICE CAPS WILL MELT OMG OMG WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING!"
The problem is- WE CAN'T; and really, we shouldn't. we aren't the planets caretakers. to make that presumption is simply naive. the planet existed long before people came about, and contained all walks of life, none of which really cared about the environment, and were rather self-centered. The suggest that man, being the "super-being" we apparently are, could cause such a global "catastrophe" in less then 200 years is complete and utter BS fueled by the vast quantities of similar material coming out of so-called experts mouths just to appease the dillemma hungry public.
Take, again- the mesozoic era. Temperatures were high, Pangaea, the giant super-continent, contained all walks of life, mammals, dinosaurs, etc.
Now what wiped them out? The common theory is a meteorite, another possibility is a catastrophic volcanic eruption, like a giant Krakatoa. But whatever the reason- this caused something to occur on a global scale- global cooling. the world-wide tropical temperatures dropped because the sun was blocked out by ash and dust and whatnot.
So the question is- which is more natural? the global tropical temperatures 65 million years ago, or the far cooler temperatures we are experiencing today? Are we perhaps still in the aftermath of this complete change that occurred at the end of the mesozoic era, and was itself not the "natural" state of temperatures and the earth in general?
