Welcome guest. Before posting on our computer help forum, you must register. Click here it's easy and free.

Author Topic: Pentium D 950 slower than Celeron D 356 it replaced  (Read 3425 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

damnitzhym

    Topic Starter


    Starter

    Pentium D 950 slower than Celeron D 356 it replaced
    « on: June 02, 2009, 03:49:22 PM »
    I'm on a very tight budget at the moment so replacing this PC is presently not an option. PC is Compaq SR2150NX w/ ECS RC415ST-HM motherboard. HP/Compaq spec. page states Pent D 9xx CPUs are compatible with this MB. Memory is maxed out @ 2GB. I have been into "msconfig" and gotten it to recognize the 2nd core, but some of my programs are noticeably slower. I'm guessing the board while functional w/ Pent D 950 dual-core, is not optimized to take full advantage of dual-core processor.

    I'm now thinking of installing a Pent 4 661 (3.6Ghz) and selling my Pent D 950. Does anyone think the P4 will yield better results ie. faster operation than D 950 on this motherboard or should I just reinstall the Celeron D 356 (3.33Ghz) that came with it?

    I've been told a P4 of the same Ghz rating as a Celeron D is a faster processor running some if not most applications. Is this true?

    Please help.
    Thanks

    damnitzhym

      Topic Starter


      Starter

      Re: Pentium D 950 slower than Celeron D 356 it replaced
      « Reply #1 on: June 02, 2009, 06:27:42 PM »
      google for "CPU to Front Side Bus Ratio."  I think you'll be surprised as to how all the components work together to attain a certain throughput for any given PC.
      The speed/characteristics of your RAM plays an important roll as well

      HP specs the MB @ 800/533 FSB depending on the CPU installed. Intel specs the D 950 @800Mhz FSB. Celeron Ratio is 6.24:1 compared to Pent D ratio of 4.25:1 - Pent D should be more efficient than Celeron D based on these ratios even if it was a "single core," correct?

      The installed memory is (2) identical PC-4200 533 MHz DDR2. HP says this MB can also accept PC2-5300 667 MHz DDR2. I'm sure swapping in some 5300/667 RAM will help, but it doesn't  seem like that should resolve the existing problem. Am I wrong about this?

      patio

      • Moderator


      • Genius
      • Maud' Dib
      • Thanked: 1769
        • Yes
      • Experience: Beginner
      • OS: Windows 7
      Re: Pentium D 950 slower than Celeron D 356 it replaced
      « Reply #2 on: June 02, 2009, 06:31:35 PM »
      Anything at the ECS site on maximising a dual-core CPU ? ?
      I doubt HP's site would be very detailed on this...

      If i remember correctly ECS had a User Forum at one time....worth a look.
      " Anyone who goes to a psychiatrist should have his head examined. "

      damnitzhym

        Topic Starter


        Starter

        Re: Pentium D 950 slower than Celeron D 356 it replaced
        « Reply #3 on: June 02, 2009, 08:33:53 PM »
        Anything at the ECS site on maximising a dual-core CPU ? ?
        I doubt HP's site would be very detailed on this...

        If i remember correctly ECS had a User Forum at one time....worth a look.

        No support on ECS site for RC415ST-HM.

        patio

        • Moderator


        • Genius
        • Maud' Dib
        • Thanked: 1769
          • Yes
        • Experience: Beginner
        • OS: Windows 7
        Re: Pentium D 950 slower than Celeron D 356 it replaced
        « Reply #4 on: June 02, 2009, 08:44:41 PM »
        " Anyone who goes to a psychiatrist should have his head examined. "