Reported.
By the way kpac, why are you trying to cover up for that guy?
You could show some intelligence, for example:
If he meant to write a normal accepted word, why did he censor it?
Censored words are cuss words.
I am 100% sure he didn't mean 'fecking'.
'-' doesn't stand for omission, * does.
'-' is used to couple words together (e.g. "part-crunching", "bone-clicking").
If It did, it would be f- - - - ing (each - replacing a character).
When one curses, **** is used.
However he did not, he wrote only one -.
Either way, that kind of writing causes me
grief, which is against the forum rules.
You think I'm dumb don't you?
Of course I read the forum rules
before I made accusations.
I read them all carefully.
Fact is, the language he wrote was intentionally censored,
so don't try to cover him up.
I find this a very unfair way of treating forum users who have valid complaints.
Also, Salmon, you can join my ignore.
I don't tolerate users who break the rules and are not friendly.
Moderators, see here:
http://www.computerhope.com/forum/index.php/topic,70852.0.htmlQ.
- # Posts flaming other members/rude posts
- # Posts with obscene or inappropriate language
Proof A: Salmon has posted a rude post
Proof B: BC_Programmer censored his post, implying a cuss word, a tantrum word, which is unpleasant behavior.
Proof C: Salmon has been very rude before (his 63rd post), I am referring back to the first rule (no flaming/rude posts):
Q. "billrich, you are an
obstinate, ignorant, stupid fool. It is way past time that you were
compelled to shut up."
Calling people names. Against rules. Rude. Dismissed.
post 77 Q. "but don't whine about the negative feedback that such an attitude is bound to bring you."
Rude: saying people "whine"
post 80 .Q "pds, unfortunately you are (and have been) posting nonsense. if you cannot answer questions properly, do not answer them at all."
post 138; saying someone has mental health issues
Q. "xfusion, billrich is a person with mental health issues who has been banned under several different names, but he keeps coming back, and the mods won't do anything about it. Please just ignore him."
post 139; rude acronym; inappropriate language; against forum rules
Q. "Well, it was you, the banned loony, who helped drive it off topic, with your ridiculous posts, so maybe you should just STFU?"
post 142; rude;
Q. "He's completely crazy."
post 154; calling people names; being arrogant; rude
Q. "trollboy still doesn't get it."
post 175; arrogance; rude
Q. "A question: how is that "tough"? I asked my 9 year old nephew to do the arithmetic, and he did it very easily."
post 179; rude instead or diplomatic
Q. "Get off my case, Allan."
post 203: calling someone a fool; rude
Q. "makes you sound like a fool."
post 229: extremely rude + namecalling; rude
Q. "Just read the posts on this forum to see how dumb Windows users are compared with Linux users. Not including the "I downloaded Obunto and now I can't find My Documents" type people."
post 249: obnoxious unpleasant rude behavior; rude
Q. "You'd fail Moral Philosophy 101 with that argument, except possibly in Nazi Germany or Pol Pot's Cambodia."
post 270: obnoxious; rude
Q. "And you never will while you keep posting nonsense."
Clearly this guy is nothing but an obnoxious Brit, most people don't like him because
of his arrogance and his obnoxious nature.
I don't want anything to do with this guy and if I was an admin, he would be banned.
Also, arithmetics are difficult. Don't come talk about your 9 year old nephew.
When I was 9, I could do + and -, not more.
It was already difficult for me.
I could do arithmetics when I was 21.
By this I therefor stand,
Treval
