Author Topic: Your system benchmark score (Using: PassMark) (Read 51063 times)

Computer Hope Admin · « **on:** March 03, 2009, 10:27:04 AM »

To help maybe create some additional posts outside the original SBBC thread I'm creating this thread to see what everyone's computers benchmark score in PassMark is. Users who don't have their own custom built computer are also welcome to post in this thread.

Download for PassMark

Primary: 2067.7
Secondary: 556.6

Kurtiskain · « **Reply #1 on:** March 03, 2009, 08:01:34 PM »

I got 825.7

Here's the rundown:

This was using:
ASUS P5KPL-CM
Intel Core 2 Duo E7400 @ 2.8GHZ (stock)
2GB DDR2 800
Radeon x700 128MB
And.....Windows 7

Computer Hope Admin · « **Reply #2 on:** March 03, 2009, 10:41:02 PM »

Impressive got me dominated.

Would be interesting if you happen to go back to Vista or XP in the future to run it again on the machine to see how much of a difference you get.

Kurtiskain · « **Reply #3 on:** March 04, 2009, 12:48:05 AM »

Quote from: Computer Hope Admin on March 03, 2009, 10:41:02 PM

Impressive got me dominated. Would be interesting if you happen to go back to Vista or XP in the future to run it again on the machine to see how much of a difference you get.

XP I will once the Beta stops being supported

And I wont be top for very long...Both Patio/Computeruler have quad cores, with 8800GT/a really good x2 Radeon so should produce much higher scores

computeruler · « **Reply #4 on:** March 05, 2009, 05:38:40 PM »

patio · « **Reply #5 on:** March 06, 2009, 07:44:40 AM »

1409.7...
I didn't do a screen capture.

Computer Hope Admin · « **Reply #6 on:** March 06, 2009, 09:18:34 AM »

Nice score Patio and computeruler. Maybe it's time for me to upgrade computers.

patio · « **Reply #7 on:** March 06, 2009, 09:49:30 AM »

It took a dump on the CD read/write test...why i don't know.
This was on the new build reviewed by me in Raidmax Smilodon here from a few months back...

This was the x64 bit ver. of Windows 7 so i was impressed...

I'll re-run it lather.

BC_Programmer · « **Reply #8 on:** March 06, 2009, 10:25:47 AM »

172.5 for my XP desktop.

Almost shameful...

computeruler · « **Reply #9 on:** March 06, 2009, 01:30:22 PM »

patio! how!

patio · « **Reply #10 on:** March 07, 2009, 04:54:46 PM »

The Machine

Very different results...same machine but running Vista Ultimate 64bit...Hmmmmm

1247 Vista vs. 1409 Windows 7

patio · « **Reply #11 on:** March 07, 2009, 05:05:21 PM »

Interesting...it keeps changing. The CD test seems to be dragging the score down.
I'll try on a fresh cold boot.

computeruler · « **Reply #12 on:** March 07, 2009, 05:41:19 PM »

We have the same cpu! Isnt a 4870 better than the 8800gts??? You just have better ram and better hard drives!

patio · « **Reply #13 on:** March 07, 2009, 05:47:15 PM »

If you notice your 3D score is higher with a lower 2D score...yes the 4870 is supposed to be better....
It was not available in my price range when i did the build...
It now costs what i paid for the EVGA 8800GTS

BTW the test mis-reported my RAM...

computeruler · « **Reply #14 on:** March 07, 2009, 05:50:15 PM »

ohhhhh

patio · « **Reply #15 on:** March 07, 2009, 05:56:12 PM »

By mis-reporting i mean it cheated me...only recognised 4 out of 6G.
It's also been a good amount of tweaking up to this point.
Windows 7 flies on here but i still run Vista, XP and Win2K as well...

cdubois4 · « **Reply #16 on:** April 05, 2009, 09:25:43 AM »

here are mine I think they are decent
PassMark Rating
   This Computer   1326.3

CPU Mark
   This Computer   3718.3

2D Graphics Mark
   This Computer   565.2

3D Graphics Mark
   This Computer   1771.8

Memory Mark
   This Computer   1128.7

Disk Mark
   This Computer   559.0

CD Mark
   This Computer   232.4

This test was run on my new build the specs are in my listing.

Computer Hope Admin · « **Reply #17 on:** April 05, 2009, 01:15:09 PM »

Good looking scores cdubois4.

computeruler · « **Reply #18 on:** April 06, 2009, 08:48:45 AM »

NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!! I was beaten!! Those denebs are accually pretty good! 220 for a 940 and its really close to the lowest end i7! I think its about 1fps away in games and stuff and I belive its better than a lot of the other quads too. Nice graphics card too. Looks really nice.

cdubois4 · « **Reply #19 on:** April 06, 2009, 10:34:36 AM »

Thanks not bad for my first build..when I get a few minutes I will post a few pictures. I ask that you guys not laugh I have not done anything with the cables and I am probably going to ask for help on that subject. Putting the computer together was easy, getting those cables to do what you want is another story completely!

slidewayz14 · « **Reply #20 on:** April 06, 2009, 08:33:06 PM »

how do I capture the screen would like to post mine

Tux2 · « **Reply #21 on:** April 11, 2009, 02:02:42 PM »

Here's mine.

EDIT: I just ran the test again and I got a 560.7. Looks like my cd drive dragged me down the first time...

[attachment deleted by admin]

BC_Programmer · « **Reply #22 on:** April 12, 2009, 10:04:12 PM »

don't feel to bad tux2- my XP desktop gets 172.5.

Computer Hope Admin · « **Reply #23 on:** April 17, 2009, 03:31:15 PM »

Yippie new system arrived (didn't build this one

). Benchmarks look great though initially.

cdubois4 · « **Reply #24 on:** April 17, 2009, 04:39:39 PM »

nice numbers ! admin

computeruler · « **Reply #25 on:** April 17, 2009, 06:45:15 PM »

Omg I was beaten really bad! You just wait till I get enough money for 2 gtx 295s and that i7 extreme edition. But by then I am shure something better will be out

Calum · « **Reply #26 on:** April 18, 2009, 10:13:29 AM »

Nice new system Nathan, good numbers too.

BC_Programmer · « **Reply #27 on:** April 18, 2009, 11:56:55 AM »

Quote from: computeruler on April 17, 2009, 06:45:15 PM

Omg I was beaten really bad! You just wait till I get enough money for 2 gtx 295s and that i7 extreme edition. But by then I am shure something better will be out

In a strange twist if I pool all my various money storage locations (bank accounts, piggy banks, couch cushions, etc) I could probably buy a really nice computer. with all the latest new stuff. Of course I would then have to subsist on cheap licorice for two weeks. Also- I find it more rewarding to save up and thus have no real impact on my day to day.

and- did I say 172.5?

silly me, I must have inadvertently added the decimal and forgotten the zero! it was really 17250!

*realizes how unbelievable the story is, so tries to add a realistic perspective...*

Also, it was built by polar bears!

slidewayz14 · « **Reply #28 on:** April 27, 2009, 06:38:52 PM »

1444.2

slidewayz14 · « **Reply #29 on:** April 27, 2009, 06:55:25 PM »

here's mine

[attachment deleted by admin]

CaptainStickMan · « **Reply #30 on:** May 01, 2009, 10:26:06 PM »

benchmarks are loads of fun. Now to just find some time to get to some gaming... :/

Computer Hope Admin · « **Reply #31 on:** May 01, 2009, 11:29:01 PM »

Looks good CaptainStickMan, the screen shot has me curious to what your background looks like.

lectrocrew · « **Reply #32 on:** May 02, 2009, 09:30:36 AM »

To tell the truth I haven't done much research on this stuff and don't know much about what the numbers mean but I managed to get a score for my machine with everything at factory settings - 1642.4
Is 1255.5 low for 8GB of DDR2 1066 memory?

[attachment deleted by admin]

computeruler · « **Reply #33 on:** May 02, 2009, 08:58:09 PM »

I really need a new computer. Everyone is beating me! Well you just wait!

CaptainStickMan · « **Reply #34 on:** May 02, 2009, 09:01:15 PM »

Quote from: Computer Hope Admin on May 01, 2009, 11:29:01 PM

Looks good CaptainStickMan, the screen shot has me curious to what your background looks like.

Well I am usually too scared to blow up the hardware that I couldn't really afford in the first place, but I took a shot at slight overclocking. The results are a little strange as are the results from the other benchmark program. Oh and if you were intrigued as to what my other background was, then this one should really pique your interest haha.

computeruler · « **Reply #35 on:** May 02, 2009, 09:03:41 PM »

I knew what the other one was but that one... lol

camerongray · « **Reply #36 on:** July 22, 2009, 03:17:05 AM »

Here are the Passmark Scores for My PCs

Main Desktop - See Specs on Left - 93.4 Under Windows 7 and 141.6 under XP Pro

Server - 800mHz Pentium III, 192mb RAM, Windows 2003 - 108.1

Netbook - Samsung NC10, Windows XP - 198.0

A desktop beaten by a netbook

Computer Hope Admin · « **Reply #37 on:** July 22, 2009, 01:43:46 PM »

Very interesting, thanks for the post Cameron. Unfortunate that a netbook beats your desktop and that XP Pro had a higher rank than Windows 7. Would imagine it's because of the requirements of Windows 7.

BC_Programmer · « **Reply #38 on:** July 24, 2009, 11:25:03 AM »

my laptop gets 665.7

I'll try to remember to return when my first build is finished

BC_Programmer · « **Reply #39 on:** July 30, 2009, 07:28:14 PM »

new build finished

[attachment deleted by admin]

computeruler · « **Reply #40 on:** July 30, 2009, 09:37:46 PM »

Nice! With the recent upgrades I got, I think I will overclock and then re run this

Boozu · « **Reply #41 on:** August 01, 2009, 03:10:35 PM »

I got 1113.1. The CD test is stupid. manly because it's not a CD test but a DVD test unless anyone knows of a CD that has 1 gig of storage space.

patio · « **Reply #42 on:** August 01, 2009, 04:33:14 PM »

The CD/DVD test is less than 5% of the scoring so i wouldn't fret about it...

ThomasTheXPUser · « **Reply #43 on:** August 01, 2009, 06:23:42 PM »

Quote

Here are the Passmark Scores for My PCs

Main Desktop - See Specs on Left - 93.4 Under Windows 7 and 141.6 under XP Pro

Server - 800mHz Pentium III, 192mb RAM, Windows 2003 - 108.1

Netbook - Samsung NC10, Windows XP - 198.0

A desktop beaten by a netbook Sad

Don't worry, my desktop was beaten by the netbook, too

lectrocrew · « **Reply #44 on:** August 01, 2009, 08:22:26 PM »

Here's my Dell, P4, 2gb RAM, Geforce 5200 @ 291.9
compared to my big PC already posted @ 1642.4

Computer Hope Admin · « **Reply #45 on:** August 03, 2009, 08:28:02 AM »

Thanks for sharing ThomasTheXPUser and lectrocrew

smeezekitty · « **Reply #46 on:** August 17, 2009, 02:20:10 PM »

not that good

[attachment deleted by admin]

Computer Hope Forum

News:

Author Topic: Your system benchmark score (Using: PassMark) (Read 51063 times)

Computer Hope Admin

Kurtiskain

Computer Hope Admin

Kurtiskain

computeruler

patio

Computer Hope Admin

patio

BC_Programmer

computeruler

patio

patio

computeruler

patio

computeruler

patio

cdubois4

Computer Hope Admin

computeruler

cdubois4

slidewayz14

Tux2

BC_Programmer

Computer Hope Admin

cdubois4

computeruler

Calum

BC_Programmer

slidewayz14

slidewayz14

CaptainStickMan

Computer Hope Admin

lectrocrew

computeruler

CaptainStickMan

computeruler

camerongray

Computer Hope Admin

BC_Programmer

BC_Programmer

computeruler

Boozu

patio

ThomasTheXPUser

lectrocrew

Computer Hope Admin

smeezekitty