Your system benchmark score (Using: CrystalMark2004)

[computeruler]

I thought amd was better 

[paudashlake]

No doubt in my mind.....................  it is!

I have a 2.3, you have a 2.5!  See the difference?

And my gpu is horrific!

[computeruler]

2.4 My gpu is horrific too!
Death to amd/ati!

[paudashlake]

ATI MUST DIE!

haha, hey it rhymed!

[CaptainStickMan]

hmm... maybe i should overclock...

and PS - AMD is NOT better...

[Calum]

Captain - could you post your specs, or even better, edit them into your profile, so we can see what hardware you have?

[CaptainStickMan]

XClio A380 Full tower ATX case (Black)
Enermax Galaxy EGA1000EWL 1000W ATX (80 plus) PSU
Intel DX58SO LGA 1366 Intel X58 ATX motherboard
Intel Core i7 940 Nehalem 2.93GHz Quad-Core Processor
6GB (3x2GB) G.Skill 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM (PC3 10666)
ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 1GB 512-bit GDDR3
4x Seagate Barracuda 320GB SATA2 (all 4 drives in RAID 0 array)
Sony Blu-ray Burner BWU-100A
Samsung 22x SATA DVD burner SH-s223F
Hanns•G HG-281DPB Black 27.5" 3ms Widescreen LCD HDMI Monitor
Microsoft M54-00013 Blue Bluetooth keyboard
Logitech G5 Laser mouse
Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate x64


<3 newegg.com

[computeruler]

I <3 newegg too!  Very nice system you got there.  Makes me feel old and outdated and I want a new one.  Also, wouldnt it be about the same price to just gt a 2tb hard drive?

[CaptainStickMan]

probably right, but the transfer speeds are much faster with 4 drives on RAID 0. Also, I originally built my system two years ago, and have since replaced all but the keyboard, mouse, case, and... Hard drives    There might have possibly been 1TB drives available at that time, but if so were very pricey. 320s were the most bang for the buck at the time. Been serving me well or they would have gone the way of the EVGA motherboard that I quickly came to loathe which now sits collecting dust in the closet lol.

[lectrocrew]

No 64Bit ? ?     

I could run a few individual tests but no results page.

Me too. 

[CaptainStickMan]

hmm, i'm 64 bit and didn't have any issues.

[lectrocrew]

Ah, there we go. It will run on 64bit.

[CaptainStickMan]

This is with a slight overclock of the Host Clock Frequency, about 10 Mhz I believe.  The results seem a little strange, mostly I guess the fact that the HDD score was down. Possibly related to major fragmenting from backing up and deleting files from computers that I have been working on...  anyway, I'm sure this hardware is capable of much more, but I don't feel like risking blowing is all up, so that's good enough 

[Computer Hope Admin]

Yeah definately not worth damaging the hardware, you're getting great results with what you're already doing.

[patio]

Bad DLoad...got it to run on VistaX64 and Win7X64...

CrystalMark :  161832