Welcome guest. Before posting on our computer help forum, you must register. Click here it's easy and free.

Author Topic: Your system benchmark score (Using: CrystalMark2004)  (Read 85131 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

computeruler



    Egghead

    Thanked: 63
    • Yes
    • Yes
  • Experience: Experienced
  • OS: Mac OS
Re: Your system benchmark score (Using: CrystalMark2004)
« Reply #30 on: April 13, 2009, 10:09:17 AM »
I thought amd was better  ::)

paudashlake



    Hopeful

    Thanked: 6
    • Experience: Experienced
    • OS: Windows 7
    Re: Your system benchmark score (Using: CrystalMark2004)
    « Reply #31 on: April 15, 2009, 07:21:46 PM »
    No doubt in my mind.....................  it is!

    I have a 2.3, you have a 2.5!  See the difference?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

    And my gpu is horrific!
    Hinkle Finkle Dinkle Doo.  AMEN!! 


    computeruler



      Egghead

      Thanked: 63
      • Yes
      • Yes
    • Experience: Experienced
    • OS: Mac OS
    Re: Your system benchmark score (Using: CrystalMark2004)
    « Reply #32 on: April 16, 2009, 02:58:00 PM »
    2.4 My gpu is horrific too!
    Death to amd/ati!

    paudashlake



      Hopeful

      Thanked: 6
      • Experience: Experienced
      • OS: Windows 7
      Re: Your system benchmark score (Using: CrystalMark2004)
      « Reply #33 on: April 16, 2009, 03:00:24 PM »
      ATI MUST DIE!

      haha, hey it rhymed!
      Hinkle Finkle Dinkle Doo.  AMEN!! 


      CaptainStickMan



        Greenhorn

        Re: Your system benchmark score (Using: CrystalMark2004)
        « Reply #34 on: April 28, 2009, 09:12:46 PM »


        hmm... maybe i should overclock...

        and PS - AMD is NOT better...

        Calum

        • Moderator


        • Egghead

          Thanked: 238
          • Yes
          • Yes
        • Certifications: List
        • Computer: Specs
        • Experience: Beginner
        • OS: Other
        Re: Your system benchmark score (Using: CrystalMark2004)
        « Reply #35 on: April 29, 2009, 02:00:38 AM »
        Captain - could you post your specs, or even better, edit them into your profile, so we can see what hardware you have?

        CaptainStickMan



          Greenhorn

          Re: Your system benchmark score (Using: CrystalMark2004)
          « Reply #36 on: April 29, 2009, 05:31:37 PM »
          XClio A380 Full tower ATX case (Black)
          Enermax Galaxy EGA1000EWL 1000W ATX (80 plus) PSU
          Intel DX58SO LGA 1366 Intel X58 ATX motherboard
          Intel Core i7 940 Nehalem 2.93GHz Quad-Core Processor
          6GB (3x2GB) G.Skill 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM (PC3 10666)
          ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 1GB 512-bit GDDR3
          4x Seagate Barracuda 320GB SATA2 (all 4 drives in RAID 0 array)
          Sony Blu-ray Burner BWU-100A
          Samsung 22x SATA DVD burner SH-s223F
          Hanns•G HG-281DPB Black 27.5" 3ms Widescreen LCD HDMI Monitor
          Microsoft M54-00013 Blue Bluetooth keyboard
          Logitech G5 Laser mouse
          Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate x64


          <3 newegg.com

          computeruler



            Egghead

            Thanked: 63
            • Yes
            • Yes
          • Experience: Experienced
          • OS: Mac OS
          Re: Your system benchmark score (Using: CrystalMark2004)
          « Reply #37 on: April 29, 2009, 06:58:03 PM »
          I <3 newegg too!  Very nice system you got there.  Makes me feel old and outdated and I want a new one.  Also, wouldnt it be about the same price to just gt a 2tb hard drive?

          CaptainStickMan



            Greenhorn

            Re: Your system benchmark score (Using: CrystalMark2004)
            « Reply #38 on: April 29, 2009, 07:35:38 PM »
            probably right, but the transfer speeds are much faster with 4 drives on RAID 0. Also, I originally built my system two years ago, and have since replaced all but the keyboard, mouse, case, and... Hard drives  :P  There might have possibly been 1TB drives available at that time, but if so were very pricey. 320s were the most bang for the buck at the time. Been serving me well or they would have gone the way of the EVGA motherboard that I quickly came to loathe which now sits collecting dust in the closet lol.

            lectrocrew



              Mentor

            • ole dog learning new tricks
            • Thanked: 21
              • Yes
              • Yes
              • My first self -built computer
            • Certifications: List
            • Computer: Specs
            • Experience: Familiar
            • OS: Other
            Re: Your system benchmark score (Using: CrystalMark2004)
            « Reply #39 on: May 02, 2009, 06:28:38 PM »
            No 64Bit ? ?     :'(

            I could run a few individual tests but no results page.
            Me too.  :(

            CaptainStickMan



              Greenhorn

              Re: Your system benchmark score (Using: CrystalMark2004)
              « Reply #40 on: May 02, 2009, 07:51:36 PM »
              hmm, i'm 64 bit and didn't have any issues.


              lectrocrew



                Mentor

              • ole dog learning new tricks
              • Thanked: 21
                • Yes
                • Yes
                • My first self -built computer
              • Certifications: List
              • Computer: Specs
              • Experience: Familiar
              • OS: Other
              Re: Your system benchmark score (Using: CrystalMark2004)
              « Reply #41 on: May 03, 2009, 10:04:08 AM »
              Ah, there we go. It will run on 64bit.


              CaptainStickMan



                Greenhorn

                Re: Your system benchmark score (Using: CrystalMark2004)
                « Reply #42 on: May 03, 2009, 05:24:46 PM »


                This is with a slight overclock of the Host Clock Frequency, about 10 Mhz I believe.  The results seem a little strange, mostly I guess the fact that the HDD score was down. Possibly related to major fragmenting from backing up and deleting files from computers that I have been working on...  anyway, I'm sure this hardware is capable of much more, but I don't feel like risking blowing is all up, so that's good enough  ::)

                Computer Hope Admin

                  Topic Starter
                • Administrator


                • Prodigy

                  Thanked: 242
                  • Yes
                  • Yes
                  • Yes
                  • Computer Hope
                • Certifications: List
                • Computer: Specs
                • Experience: Guru
                • OS: Windows 10
                Re: Your system benchmark score (Using: CrystalMark2004)
                « Reply #43 on: May 05, 2009, 11:17:59 PM »
                Yeah definately not worth damaging the hardware, you're getting great results with what you're already doing.
                Everybody is a genius. But, if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will spend its whole life believing that it is stupid.
                -Albert Einstein

                patio

                • Moderator


                • Genius
                • Maud' Dib
                • Thanked: 1682
                  • Yes
                • Experience: Beginner
                • OS: Windows 7
                Re: Your system benchmark score (Using: CrystalMark2004)
                « Reply #44 on: May 06, 2009, 06:50:12 AM »
                Bad DLoad...got it to run on VistaX64 and Win7X64...

                Quote
                CrystalMark :  161832
                   
                 
                " Anyone who goes to a psychiatrist should have his head examined. "