Thanks for the replies. You have made a good case for NOT using registry cleaners.
I do however have a few questions. It seems that Fred Langa likes the JV16 PowerTools registry cleaner if I read this correctly. Sure, It does detect more 'errors' than the other cleaners. But from what you all say-the more 'errors' detected and then fixed-wouldn't that mean the more damage you would produce?
Also, I didn't see RegCure in any comparisons so I looked for myself and found this:
http://www.registry-cleaner-reviews.net/regcure/. It shows 875 entries the first scan; 177 entries the second scan; and 118 entries the third scan. According to comparison to Do I need a Registry Cleaner?, the comments there suggest that multiple cleanings and multiple results are something to be suspect of a supposedly good registry cleaner.
My one remaining question here is: Is it OK to run the registry cleaners and see its results but not actually fix anything?
Also, so many people say let the experts do it unless you know what you're doing. And yet nowhere does anyone tell you how to learn how to do it and learn what is connected, interconnected, and what is dysfunctional and can be deleted safely without any repercussions.
How would one learn about the registry and how it records data, how it creates links that become orphaned (and thus delete?), how it may have a non functional link now-but later that link can be reconnected to a future device you might hook up?
I am fortunately/unfortunately (depends on your point of view) the clean type Tony Randall to Jack Klugman's messy type in The Odd Couple. I like NOT having useless or dead entries in my registry. Even if it means no increase in computer speed or functionality. But I won't do anything about them until I can know what I am doing.
So having said all that, I await some way of learning what to do in order to understand more fully about the intricacies of the registry.
Thanks again for all the insight.