In Mac, you only get one version, the one that M$ would be calling Ultimate edition.
An ultimate edition that only left-clicks? Seems a bit lacking in features.
Yes I really need to get over the single-button nature of it's mouse.
But seriously... One button... what kind of insipid pseudosoph's can even contend that a single button is better then two?
And, at least the last time I checked, they sold a 2-button mouse as a "professional" product. Because we all know, it takes at least a bachelors in an art program or a masters to comprehend the complicated mechanics involved in using two active digits. And let's not get started keeping the two apart! How do you know when to right click, when to left click! It's all so confusing!
Apple should have just used a giant touchpad on the wall, that way their users can just throw feces at it. I mean, really, if a second mouse button is "beyond" the basic grasp of the people ironically deemed professionals (if only because they paid a "professional" price), how can we even be sure they understand one button, or even that the mouses movements horizontally dictate the cursors movement along a vertical plane. It makes no sense! heck, while we're at it remove a dimension of movement, because if translating the movements from a horizontal plane to a vertical one is a difficult concept, it's only safe to assume that two dimensions are one too many for a "perfect" OS that apple claims.
Which brings me to another point- if OSX is so "perfect" why do they need to keep releasing a new version? Do the specifications for perfection keep changing, or an I missing some intrinsic rule of a "perfect OS": We never have bugs. WE're not fixing things. we're just trying to run out of names of large cats to name our OS so we can finally name it "Mac OS Badger". Tom in marketing is pressing us for this. We're working towards a utopian set of Operating Systems.
It'll be great! There will be Mac OS Toad, Mac OS Mole, Mac OS Water Rat.... Part of the Wind in the Willows suite.
OK I'm done.
